Be a bit more relaxed about not yet constrained infer vars in closure upvar analysis

Author: compiler-errors

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs

@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ pub trait TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx> {
 
     fn resolve_vars_if_possible<T: TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(&self, t: T) -> T;
 
-    fn try_structurally_resolve_type(&self, span: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx>;
+    fn structurally_resolve_type(&self, span: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx>;
 
     fn report_bug(&self, span: Span, msg: impl ToString) -> Self::Error;
 
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx> for &FnCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         self.infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(t)
     }
 
-    fn try_structurally_resolve_type(&self, sp: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
-        (**self).try_structurally_resolve_type(sp, ty)
+    fn structurally_resolve_type(&self, sp: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
+        (**self).structurally_resolve_type(sp, ty)
     }
 
     fn report_bug(&self, span: Span, msg: impl ToString) -> Self::Error {
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx> for (&LateContext<'tcx>, LocalDefId) {
         self.0.maybe_typeck_results().expect("expected typeck results")
     }
 
-    fn try_structurally_resolve_type(&self, _span: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
+    fn structurally_resolve_type(&self, _span: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
         // FIXME: Maybe need to normalize here.
         ty
     }
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
 
         // Select just those fields of the `with`
         // expression that will actually be used
-        match self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(with_expr.span, with_place.place.ty()).kind() {
+        match self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(with_expr.span, with_place.place.ty()).kind() {
             ty::Adt(adt, args) if adt.is_struct() => {
                 // Consume those fields of the with expression that are needed.
                 for (f_index, with_field) in adt.non_enum_variant().fields.iter_enumerated() {
@@ -1185,12 +1185,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
             Some(ty) => {
                 let ty = self.cx.resolve_vars_if_possible(ty);
                 self.cx.error_reported_in_ty(ty)?;
-                if ty.is_ty_var() {
-                    debug!("resolve_type_vars_or_bug: infer var from {:?}", ty);
-                    Err(self.cx.report_bug(self.cx.tcx().hir_span(id), "encountered type variable"))
-                } else {
-                    Ok(ty)
-                }
+                Ok(ty)
             }
             None => {
                 // FIXME: We shouldn't be relying on the infcx being tainted.
@@ -1264,10 +1259,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
                     // a bind-by-ref means that the base_ty will be the type of the ident itself,
                     // but what we want here is the type of the underlying value being borrowed.
                     // So peel off one-level, turning the &T into T.
-                    match self
-                        .cx
-                        .try_structurally_resolve_type(pat.span, base_ty)
-                        .builtin_deref(false)
+                    match self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(pat.span, base_ty).builtin_deref(false)
                     {
                         Some(ty) => Ok(ty),
                         None => {
@@ -1513,10 +1505,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
             if node_ty != place_ty
                 && self
                     .cx
-                    .try_structurally_resolve_type(
-                        self.cx.tcx().hir_span(base_place.hir_id),
-                        place_ty,
-                    )
+                    .structurally_resolve_type(self.cx.tcx().hir_span(base_place.hir_id), place_ty)
                     .is_impl_trait()
             {
                 projections.push(Projection { kind: ProjectionKind::OpaqueCast, ty: node_ty });
@@ -1538,7 +1527,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
         let base_ty = self.expr_ty_adjusted(base)?;
 
         let ty::Ref(region, _, mutbl) =
-            *self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(base.span, base_ty).kind()
+            *self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(base.span, base_ty).kind()
         else {
             span_bug!(expr.span, "cat_overloaded_place: base is not a reference");
         };
@@ -1556,7 +1545,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
         let base_curr_ty = base_place.place.ty();
         let deref_ty = match self
             .cx
-            .try_structurally_resolve_type(self.cx.tcx().hir_span(base_place.hir_id), base_curr_ty)
+            .structurally_resolve_type(self.cx.tcx().hir_span(base_place.hir_id), base_curr_ty)
             .builtin_deref(true)
         {
             Some(ty) => ty,
@@ -1584,7 +1573,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
     ) -> Result<VariantIdx, Cx::Error> {
         let res = self.cx.typeck_results().qpath_res(qpath, pat_hir_id);
         let ty = self.cx.typeck_results().node_type(pat_hir_id);
-        let ty::Adt(adt_def, _) = self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() else {
+        let ty::Adt(adt_def, _) = self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() else {
             return Err(self
                 .cx
                 .report_bug(span, "struct or tuple struct pattern not applied to an ADT"));
@@ -1616,7 +1605,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
         span: Span,
     ) -> Result<usize, Cx::Error> {
         let ty = self.cx.typeck_results().node_type(pat_hir_id);
-        match self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
+        match self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
             ty::Adt(adt_def, _) => Ok(adt_def.variant(variant_index).fields.len()),
             _ => {
                 self.cx
@@ -1631,7 +1620,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
     /// Here `pat_hir_id` is the HirId of the pattern itself.
     fn total_fields_in_tuple(&self, pat_hir_id: HirId, span: Span) -> Result<usize, Cx::Error> {
         let ty = self.cx.typeck_results().node_type(pat_hir_id);
-        match self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
+        match self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
             ty::Tuple(args) => Ok(args.len()),
             _ => Err(self.cx.report_bug(span, "tuple pattern not applied to a tuple")),
         }
@@ -1820,7 +1809,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
             PatKind::Slice(before, ref slice, after) => {
                 let Some(element_ty) = self
                     .cx
-                    .try_structurally_resolve_type(pat.span, place_with_id.place.ty())
+                    .structurally_resolve_type(pat.span, place_with_id.place.ty())
                     .builtin_index()
                 else {
                     debug!("explicit index of non-indexable type {:?}", place_with_id);
@@ -1890,7 +1879,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
     }
 
     fn is_multivariant_adt(&self, ty: Ty<'tcx>, span: Span) -> bool {
-        if let ty::Adt(def, _) = self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
+        if let ty::Adt(def, _) = self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
             // Note that if a non-exhaustive SingleVariant is defined in another crate, we need
             // to assume that more cases will be added to the variant in the future. This mean
             // that we should handle non-exhaustive SingleVariant the same way we would handle

tests/crashes/131758.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+//@ check-pass
+//@ revisions: current next
+//@ ignore-compare-mode-next-solver (explicit revisions)
+//@[next] compile-flags: -Znext-solver
+
+// Regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/197>.
+// This is only an issue in the new solver, but I'm testing it in both solvers for now.
+// This has to do with the fact that the recursive `walk_dir` is a revealing use, which has not
+// yet been constrained from the defining use by the time that closure signature inference is
+// performed. We don't really care, though, since anywhere we structurally match on a type in
+// upvar analysis, we already call `structurally_resolve_type` right before `.kind()`.
+
+fn walk_dir(cb: &()) -> impl Sized {
+    || {
+        let fut = walk_dir(cb);
+    };
+}
+
+fn main() {}

tests/ui/closures/opaque-upvar.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+#![feature(unboxed_closures)]
+
+// Regression test for #131758. We only know the type of `x` after closure upvar
+// inference is done, even if we don't need to structurally resolve the type of `x`.
+
+trait Foo {}
+
+impl<T: Fn<(i32,)>> Foo for T {}
+
+fn baz<T: Foo>(_: T) {}
+
+fn main() {
+    baz(|x| ());
+}