[selectors-4][css-lists-3][css-view-transitions] Should ::view-transition-group() follow ::view-transition?

[cdoublev]

CSS Lists and Counters says that an originating element that is a pseudo-element needs to be explicitly specified in the selector. For example, ::marker does not select ::before::marker.

CSS View Transitions says that all of the view transition pseudo-elements are selected from their ultimate originating element, the document element.

For example, ::view-transition-group(*) selects all ::view-transition-group() children of ::view-transition.

A ::view-transition-group() pseudo-element is generated for each view transition name as a child of the ::view-transition pseudo-element

When a pseudo-element participates in a pseudo-element tree, its originating pseudo-element is its parent.

And ::view-transition::view-transition-group(*) is currently invalid in Chrome. Should it be valid?

Maybe the note from CSS Lists and Counters should not apply to functional sub-pseudo-elements?