I reeeeaaalllyy don't like how widespread gender realism is in supposedly feminist circles on this website. You are one step away from becoming a radfem.

“Woman” is a socially constructed category and “women” have nothing intrinsic in common, other than viewing themselves as whatever “woman” is defined as in their society, or being judged by the standards of whatever “woman” is defined as in their society. Gender is as “real” of a category as race or neurotype, which is to say, it’s not objectively real at all. It’s an artificial category created on the basis of perceived shared traits among certain people. The people came first, they were grouped into their artificial category later. There are no intrinsic differences between men or women or nonbinary or multigender people.

  1. uinferno said: @hapalopus Sick. More reading after I’m done with bell hooks’ catalogue.
  2. thetimesinbetween reblogged this from dreaminghour
  3. gehayi said: @unholyglitch404 Oh! Thank you very much. I appreciate the answer.
  4. pogasssm reblogged this from dykepuffs
  5. jayisgay reblogged this from m-e-w-666
  6. inthereellife reblogged this from m-e-w-666
  7. onceactresspdx reblogged this from arkyn-99
  8. m-e-w-666 reblogged this from nonbinaryeye
  9. nonbinaryeye reblogged this from ante--meridiem
  10. bevydev reblogged this from staticyuroboros
  11. wimblysideblog reblogged this from floodgoblin2
  12. coloradoweeks reblogged this from cock-holliday
  13. gaychocolatehomicide reblogged this from thenot-so-polite-canadian
  14. dreaminghour reblogged this from derinthescarletpescatarian
  15. wiliamsiliam reblogged this from rejectedcopy
  16. floodgoblin2 reblogged this from touhouweed
  17. sunflowerpie reblogged this from logictxt
  18. novicehydra reblogged this from kintatsujo
  19. rejectedcopy reblogged this from babybluebanshee
maziekeen