@not100bees

You know this website really has changed Tom Hiddleston is being gay as fuck in a TV show and I've seen maybe two posts about it. If that had happened 10 to 12 years ago it would have been inescapable it would have been truly radically inescapable you would have not been able to get away from it

15 01 2026 • 3,521 notes
Source: @not100bees
<3
@teomodo

art books on the internet archive for you

morpho books

figure drawing for all it's worth (+ creative illustration)

framed ink

will eisner comics and sequential art

will eisner graphic storytelling and visual narrative

understanding comics (+ making comics)

folder of various animation production art

burne hogarth drawing dynamic hands

perspective for comic book artists

michael mattesi force drawing

the animator's survival kit

color and light james gurney

be free

@bedupolker

I've recommended this one before, but for all the non-human vertebrate likers out there... the art of animal drawing

15 01 2026 • 43,612 notes
Source: @teomodo
<3
#ref #save #reference
@spacesapphist

Global Trans Histories (PDFs)


Class readings in order of when they were assigned.


Laurie Marhoefer, “Lesbianism, Transvestitism, and the Nazi State: A Microhistory of a Gestapo Investigation, 1939–1943” (2016)

Katie Sutton, “Sexology’s Photographic Turn: Visualizing Trans Identity in Interwar Germany” (2018)

Evan B. Towle and Lynn Marie Morgan, “Romancing The Transgender Native: Rethinking the Use of the ‘Third Gender’ Concept” (2002)

Aniruddha Dutta and Raina Roy, “Decolonizing Transgender in India, Some Reflections” (2014)

Qwo-Li Driskill, “Doubleweaving Two-Spirit Critiques: Building Alliances between Native and Queer Studies” (2010)

Qwo-Li Driskill, Asegi Stories: Cherokee Queer & Two Spirit Memory (2016)

Kai Pyle, “Naming and Claiming: Recovering Ojibwe and Plains Cree Two-Spirit Language” (2018)

Megan J. Sinnott, Toms and Dees: Transgender Identity and Same-Sex Relationships in Thailand (2004)

Howard Chiang, After Eunuchs: Science, Medicine, and the Transformation of Sex in Modern China (2018)

Afsaneh Najmabadi, “Mapping Transformations Of Sex, Gender, And Sexuality In Modern Iran” (2005)

Cece McDonald, “Go beyond our natural selves: The Prison Letters of Cece McDonald” (2017)

Kai M. Green and Marquis Bey, "Where Black Feminist Thought and Trans* Feminism Meet: A Conversation" (2018)

Cassius Adair, “Licensing Citizenship: Anti-Blackness, ID Documents, and Transgender Studies” (2019)

Cole Rizki, “Latin/x American Trans Studies” (2019)

Hillary Hiner and Juan Carlos Garrido, “Antitrans State Terrorism: Trans and Travesti Women, Human Rights, and Recent History in Chile” (2019)

Susana Pena, “Gender and Sexuality in Latina/o Miami: Documenting Latina Transexual Activists” (2010)

15 01 2026 • 766 notes
Source: @spacesapphist
<3
#ref #save #reference
@canagadoodles

An infographic image with Starro from The Suicide Squad (2021) in the background. Starro is a giant alien starfish with a large central eye, destroying a city. Text: "Project Starfish: aka amazon is stealing small business data because it wants to be amazon.com - Earth's only bookstore." Amazon's 1998 logo is referenced, with its tagline "Earth's biggest bookstore".ALT
An infographic image showing two sets of brand listings from Amazon - Friday Afternoon Tea and Sketch Sauce. Products featured from Sketch Sauce (a production partner of 3D artists) features sculptures from Found Family Adventurecrafts, Grumpii and Leylina Figurines. Text: "Small business owners in the US suddenly noticed that their products were listed on Amazon. They were not told that this was happening. They did not opt in. They did not give Amazon permission."ALT
An infographic. Text: "How'd they get our data for this? PROJECT STARFISH. According to internal documents leaked to Business Insider in late 2024: "(Starfish)... uses AI models to scrape and then generate "complete, correct and consistent product information globally." The eventual goal of the multiyear project is to make Amazon the best source of product information for "all products worldwide," the document added." The only online store you'll need." A cartoon face looking stressed is drawn in the corner.ALT
Text: "Starfish has been BUSY: Scraping 200,000 brand websites for product data (in 2025 alone) Auto-rewriting titles, bullets and descriptions using generative AI AI-generating product images, video ads and written information to fill listings A/B testing AI-enhanced vs. standard listings In service of an 'experimental' program that we never consented to and were never told about." An image from Amazon's information page is shown below, detailing the process for the AI shopping agent. It reads, "1. Search brands. Explore a range of brands and discover new selection available directly from merchant websites. 2. Shop on or off Amazon. Stay with Amazon & shop with AI assistance, or navigate directly to the merchant website. 3. Effortless purchase with AI. When you find a product you like, click 'Buy for me' and Amazon's AI handles payment to order management. 4. Manage your merchant orders. Track these orders through Amazon's 'Your orders' page under the "buy for me orders" tab.ALT
Text: "isn't it good that small businesses are getting sales from Amazon? Good question. No." A word cloud has tons of text with the consequences of this program. The various text phrases are: Increased Returns Data and listings entirely out of our hands Inaccurate/false listings Chargebacks Unprofessional display of product No customer relationship Customer confusion Refunds Policy mismatch Poor reviews Loss of brand recognition Removing personalization Rerouting customers back to Amazon Undercutting prices Privacy breaches Intellectual property violations Reduced income from external shopping Loss of insights for analytics Loss of trust Reduced credibility Data surveillance LLM & gen AI ethical issues Stolen labor Ecological impact Creating duplicate products to compete Legitimizes lack of consent in technology and more.ALT
An infographic, showing stick figures interacting. Text: "Here is a simplified visual example. Let's follow Ruth. Ruth is a small business owner who sells hand-printed tees with her original art." A picture of a stick figure (Ruth) gesturing happily to an orange shirt with a cartoon flower on it. The infographic splits into two possibilities, when customers find Ruth through Amazon vs. her online store. In the Amazon scenario, a stick figure wearing Ruth's shirt is talking to another stick figure. Text: "Where did you get your shirt?" "It's from Amazon". A picture of Ruth looks concerned. In the Ruth's Store scenario, the stick figures say: Text: "Where did you get your shirt?" "Ruth's Custom Tees!" A picture of Ruth looks pleased.ALT
An infographic showing stick figures and two scenarios: Amazon's redirect or Buy for Me, or purchasing directly from Ruth's store. Text: "Customers return to where the product was bought..." In the Amazon scenario, the stick figure looks at four shirt options. One is Ruth's, and three others are AI designed shirts (actual listings from Amazon). Text: "So many options! I'll get these." "Ruth gets one more sale. Amazon gets more." Below, a computer representing Amazon AI says: "The data collected says that Ruth's product is selling well!" There is a picture of a similar orange shirt to Ruth's, with a cartoon flower on it. Ruth is looking at the knock-off shirt design tearfully. Text: "Amazon is now offering this design. It's cheaper. Shipping is faster. Refunds are easier. Ruth's brand is pushed out." On the Ruth's Store scenario, the same stick figure is looking at four of Ruth's shirt designs on her site. Text: "So many options! I'll get these." "Ruth gets four sales." On the bottom, two happy stick figures are wearing Ruth's shirts. Ruth looks happy. Text: "Ruth has brand recognition, returning customers, and is supported by sales due to her hard work."ALT
Text: "Amazon has done this before. Multiple times." An article from Reuters by Aditya Kalra and Steve Stecklow reads: "Amazon copied products and rigged search results to promote its own brands, documents show" Text: "Amazon is not supporting small businesses with this program, because Amazon considers small businesses to be competition. Whether it be knock-offs in India or undercutting similar products in the case of Diapers.com versus Amazon Mom." An article from Timothy B. Lee on Ars Technica reads: "Amazon knew it was bleeding Quidsy dry. An internal email later in September discussed the price cuts Quidsi was forced to make to compete with the new Amazon Mom discounts. "They expect to lose lots of money in the next few yrs," wrote executive Peter Krawiec. "This will make it worse."ALT
Text: "If you own a small business and have been affected by this AI-driven program: 1) Document your listings and how they are being displayed on Amazon 2) Email branddirect@amazon.com to get your products removed from the site 3) Consider adding policy to your web shop prohibiting third-party listings 4) Consider providing your information to @bobodesignstudio, who is collecting info on shops affected to bring forward to an IP attorney 5) Consider bringing forth a consumer complaint to your State Attorney General's OfficeALT
Text: "If you are a friend of small businesses and want to help: Get loud. As we put in complaints, join them and raise the volume. Reconsider your relationship with Amazon, and pivot to small business whenever you can. We're easy to support: a kind word, a tip in the jar, a share online, and certainly being angry on our behalf at massive tech behemoths who don't care if we can afford the cost of living as long as it makes their numbers go up. To be continued."ALT


My account is still blocked from searching/tags/etc on my business blog @foundfamilyadventurecrafts so I'm posting this here. There's something very bad happening with Small Business, Tech, and Amazon. What else is new?

Links:
Bobo Design Studio for Updates & Submitting Information

Arrows Aim Greenhouse + Chroma Rex are putting together a complaint with WA State Attorney General's Office + Templates for complaints / opt out

Articles:

Amazon's Buy For Me Information Page

Reuters Article

Ars Technica Article

Business Insider Article

@friday-tea

Hey, that's us and a bunch of our friends! This whole thing SUCKS so bad and we're pissed. We've intentionally not listed our products on Amazon for the 15 years we've been in business. We're ready to join a class action lawsuit and kick some ass.

@dreamingdormouse

Friday makes really good tea, both just by the flavors and as reflections of fandoms. I absolutely LOVE my Second Breakfast (hobbits) and General's Jasmine (Uncle Iroh).

Go check out the Friday Afternoon Tea website DIRECTLY if you want to support them - and if you, unlike me, are in Seattle, go visit the brick-and-mortar store!

And boycott Amazon.

15 01 2026 • 25,993 notes
Source: @canagadoodles
<3
@creekfiend

there are a NUMBER of folktale Woman-Creatures like selkies who exist to make the inherently coercive nature of heterosexual marriage explicit and to externalize male anxiety about how if your wife had actual autonomy she very well might disappear and you might never fucking hear from her again

which is a FASCINATING category of Woman-Creature imo

@creekfiend

someone said it's also a cautionary tale about mistreating your wife and I think that's spot on especially for other related types of stories e.g. the crane wife. like I think these stories are very much Husband Anxiety Stories. the Woman-Creatures are black boxes whose interior experience it is impossible to know and who have strange and often seemingly arbitrary rules that you must follow or else they will disappear. idk. like. that's why I think that any empowering-to-women-ness qualities of these stories is incidental. I think they're externalized anxiety about coercive societal heterosexuality and the inability to truly Know one's wife in such circumstances.

@whetstonefires

you also see a variant of this formula a lot (generally at the more literary end of the fairy tale space) where it's not a creature you capture, but a magical lady who picks you for seemingly arbitrary reasons, bettering your fortune enormously with her magic and wealth and second-hand status.

and then, for reasons usually at least slightly less arbitrary, fucks off again.

the husbandly anxiety here is more about not having access to coercion as an option.

@creekfiend

oooo yes absolutely!

@creekfiend

was just talking to Story about this and he told me about one folktale where a guy meets a beautiful woman at a lake and she brings a bountiful dowry of like one million fat cows and such and she is of course a fairy so she's like "my one requirement in our bargain is that if you strike me three times I will leave" and in many versions of the story the husband doesn't ""actually"" strike her -- each time it's something like, one 'strike' involves her forgetting her gloves inside and he walks out and taps her on the shoulder with her gloves, but she tells him that counts as striking her. this sort of thing. which is TRANSPARENTLY like "whoa wouldn't it be fucked up if your wife could enforce consequences for behavior she said was harmful, even if according to your cultural norms it was fine, and you didn't see it as a big deal?" like... lol. what if women could actually be the ones who decided whether or not any given action their husbands took against them was harmful? IMAGINE... PREDEY SCARY....

15 01 2026 • 20,089 notes
Source: @creekfiend
<3
:3