Avatar

its raven im a fucking idiot

@localiability

26 | she/her | deleted my old blog lmao

me: this is a background character who's in one scene, has two lines, and is completely irrelevant to the rest of the story. i am going to stop obsessing over what to name him and use the random name generator on behindthename.com. i am going to accept the first thing it gives me and move the fuck on.

behindthename.com:

I'm gonna be real with you, i don't think weirdo kinksters should be considered acceptable collateral damage when banks/credit card companies enforce adult content bans on sites like patreon and ko-fi

"sure it's just the weirdo fetishists getting hit now but soon they'll try to censor normal queer people!!!" you should care about the fact the 'weirdo fetishists' also lost their livelihoods too

this post is already doing numbers so idc if you reblog this addition or not, but this was specifically in reference to fansly cracking down on specific fetish creators, starting with slightly niche areas like hypno and ageplay under bullshit claims over "dubious consent" (in and of itself, a kink umbrella), as well as public/exhibition kinks with stringent privacy rules (ie; must be in a backyard that is properly fenced off and hidden from view of others). I've seen these changes 'justified' and even brushed off by some larger creators in that space, or moralized as 'oh fansly doesn't like making these changes either, it just wants to stay in mastercard/visa's good graces :( don't be mad guys'

It wasn't until fansly wholesale banned furry nsfw of any kind, including anthro, with the reasoning being that it's "simulated bestiality" that it received heavier backlash.

banning kink art, even kinks you find repugnant, isn't a "stepping stone" towards censorship. it's censorship straight up.

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.