so hard to find these guys
the thing with eugenics is how effectively it naturalized oppression through a "scientific" lens through drawing on the theory of natural selection and statistical measurement tools.
feudal societies naturalized oppression quite effectively through religion, and religion is still an adequate tool for many people, but in a world structured by capitalism, the idea of viewing workers as a collective organism with a productive mechanistic function, and fine tuning the "efficiency" of that functioning via allowing the less "functional" to die, is very intuitive.
so of course a science that studies how to determine who should die to make the population more efficient for production will get funded. like obviously the people with the most capital are willing to invest in these necropolitics. on a material level they use it to determine policy, and on an ideological level they use it to make the effects of that policy act as retroactive "evidence" for the supposedly "biological" categories of race, sexgender, disability, fatness, and so on.
they'll say that a particular population faces statistically disproportionately negative health outcomes, and people will think "wow, I guess this group is biologically distinct and less 'fit'" and not "wow, people in control of the distribution of resources in our society are placing people into categories that they've designated to receive less and worse healthcare resources, and when they die sooner on average that's policy working as intended"































