Needles & Nilbogs

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

Hi? I’m Bardic, they/ghaH, and I finally gave in to temptation. If you recognize my avatar from Murderbot discord or ao3, hi, it’s me, I’m new here, I have no idea what I’m doing, but I’m going to figure it out. (if I told you I was doing this, you also should know I don’t know what I’m doing but you should at least not have a problem recognizing me?)

I am here because I am tired of yelling about Murderbot and City Spies on instagram where the void enjoys making your life harder, because I’m tired of login blocks that you have to seek and destroy, and because I’m tired of fighting blogspot every time I want to do something

Pinned Post random (a friend suggested I do this part)
tinybowties
majorcharacterundeath

i want to read more mensah&secunit fics but sooo many of them reduce her to it’s mom. theyre very close friends and she helps her friend deal w its trauma and takes care of it where it otherwise wouldnt be. that doesnt make her it’s fucking mom. like. i cant help noticing ratthi is also providing similar emotional support, guidance, and care, and yet he is not called secunit’s dad ever. go figure

tinybowties
majorcharacterundeath

i want to read more mensah&secunit fics but sooo many of them reduce her to it’s mom. theyre very close friends and she helps her friend deal w its trauma and takes care of it where it otherwise wouldnt be. that doesnt make her it’s fucking mom. like. i cant help noticing ratthi is also providing similar emotional support, guidance, and care, and yet he is not called secunit’s dad ever. go figure

ilovedthestars
possessable

also facades and false identities are so fun . many such variations.

someone accidentally slipping further into a facade than they intended . someone purposefully retreating further into a facade . someone accidentally dropping their normally impeccable facade for a moment . someone purposefully letting their facade down as a taunt or mockery or in a genuine way because they're finally in a situation where they don't need the facade anymore . someone whose facade really is just a tool that they have complete control over and it never falters or fails . someone whose facade is the opposite and they're having a really bad time trying to maintain their facade or trying to maintain their true self under the facade . many such good options. all fun.

i love you facades and false identities and presentations of the self and separation of aspects of the self and

elexuscal
elumish

I just saw a post where one of the comments was a woman saying that they don't care about the POV or internal life of female characters in general, and I didn't want to reblog that post because I didn't want to go after that specific person, but I did want to say:

If that is how you feel (regardless of what gender you are), if every time you read a female character (but only a female character) you think, ugh I don't care about them, they're so boring, female characters never have internal lives worth reading about, you need work on that.

I'm serious. Figure out what your hangup is, reevaluate how you're approaching stories, maybe get some therapy or talk to someone about it if you need to, and figure out how to get past your dismissal of female POVs as being worth reaing.

Because whatever problem you have with the internal lives or POVs of female characters, it's an issue you also have with women. It's not like female characters are somehow universally written as so fundamentally different from real women that everything you find so dull or shallow or annoying or uninteresting in those female characters is fictionalized--and, it's not like female characters are somehow universally written as so fundamentally different from male characters that everything you find so shallow or dull or annoying or uninteresting in those female characters isn't also present in those male characters in some very similar way.

And if your excuse is that men can't write women--read more things written by women. (Some men can write women well, but you should read things written by women anyway.)

Tl;dr: If you find yourself looking at every female character you read, or every Black character, or every disabled character, etc. and thinking that somehow none of them quite live up to the male/white/abled characters that you are used to reading, that's something you need to work on.

cameoappearance
toyourstations

Statistics that I use to motivate myself

I have a really bad case of the tinkerbells (I need applause to live) so I have these statistics I use to keep myself from getting depressed as a creator*. Here they are. They may help you as well!

  • In professional marketing, 5% of viewers engaging with a post is positive turnover.
  • 5% of engagers will click the link
  • 5% of link clickers will buy the product
  • On twitch, the average number of views a live stream has is between 0 and 1
  • According to social media professionals, 10% of users do all the posting. The other 90% may not even comment.

So if your fanfiction has 100 hits and 5 kudos, you're meeting your goals at fanfiction corp and you're getting your raise this year. If your fanfiction has 100 hits and 10 kudos you're getting a promotion.

If you make a post about your new ttrpg and it gets 20 likes, 10 reblogs, and makes 1 sale, you're doing really well!

If your stream has an average of 1 friend who drops in and chats to you occasionally, you're doing better than average. If you make it to Affiliate you are genuinely doing incredible work.

90% of online creative work is just shunting stuff into the void, and it feels so so so bleak sometimes. But remember. You're doing good at it! Your "flop post" with 3 notes is actually more attention than 90% of internet users get.

Remember not everyone clapping for you is telling you about it. <3

*these statistics are from memory and from anecdotes from various people I have met/seen posts from on the internet. I do not know or care if they are completely accurate thank you

newtsoftheworldunite
pennzance

The fact that a book with a name like 'Thud!' is at once an excellent statement on the futile foolishness of racism and passed-on hatred, a fantastic mystery novel, one of the best stories that follows a new father as he navigates the divide between his work and his obligation to his young boy, and also possessed of a climactic sequence of berserker violence that can make me cry and is legitimately hard to me to get through EVERY TIME is a testament to the skill and craft of Terry Pratchett.

discworld-heritage-posts

Discworld Heritage Post

no-sex-only-gender
piratesexmachine420

Mozilla have basically always been exactly the same amount of "better than the competition". As everyone else backslides, they do too, just always at more or less the same moral offset.

It's like this graph I made up:

image

Getting worse over time, but always the better option at any given moment. (Unless you're in deep enough to have strong opinions about XUL or IceWeasel, in which case you're not my target audience right now.)

piratesexmachine420

I think the difference is that when Mozilla makes a bad product it's rarely because they're trying to make money off me.

moose-mousse

I... don't think there is a difference

But at least the rumours is that their "Ignore the community l, use Large Language Models and call it AI anyway" thing have invigorated work on open source browsers

So maybe we will see in my lifetime the browser equivalent of Linux for operating systems



Like to to an article about the license firefox is running with. Because it is only technically open source


piratesexmachine420

Okay I don't necessarily disagree with your support for alternative FOSS browsers, but I don't think what you're talking about is relevant to what I was saying.

First: Firefox is unambiguously Free and Open Source. The majority of its source code is available under the terms of the Mozilla Public License version 2.0[1], which has been approved as a Free Software license by the Free Software Foundation[2] and by the Debian project[3], and as Open Source by the Open Source Initiative[4] (pick your favorite authority) and the rest is available under similar Free and Open Source licenses -- primarily Apache-2.0 and LGPL 3.0 & 2.1, as well as a number of other licenses for various third-party components. You can see this for yourself if you open Firefox and navigate to about:license in the URL bar.

image

Second: yes, the Mozilla Foundation does not grant a license to use their trademarks as part of this source code licensing.[5] This has caused trouble for various organizations in the past, as you've pointed out in the LWN article you linked, but does not contradict Firefox's status as Free and Open Source. Many other projects have similar terms, such as (to pick a recent infamous example) the Rust Foundation,[6] and many established Free and/or Open Source licenses have clauses that explicitly state they do not grant the rights to any trademarks, such as GPL v3 (via an optional term, see Section 7 "Additional Terms", list element e: "Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some trade names, trademarks, or service marks;").[7]

Moreover, the specific issue at the heart of the article you link is no longer an issue and hasn't been since Mozilla clarified their stance on use of their trademarks in 2007.[8] That is 18 years ago. The Debian project hasn't shipped Firefox under the name "Iceweasel" since 2016.[9] This is ancient history. (The Linux source tree was still being managed by BitKeeper at the time that LWN article was written!)

And more to my original point: yes, it is embarrassing to see that Mozilla is following in MS & Googles' footsteps here and integrating LLMs into their browsers (albeit with a "kill switch" permanent total opt-out, which no other big player seems to be shipping[10]), I don't see how that contradicts my claim that Mozilla doesn't ship bad features to make money off me. What is that you propose about me that these new features would entail selling? My data? Targeted Advertisements? A subscription for a feature that used to be free? This isn't any of those, it's an attempt (misguided, perhaps) to grow Firefox's popularity. That's not exploitation of users.

You can choose Pale Moon or GNU IceCat or the Tor Borwser (all three forked from Firefox, BTW, because it's open source[11][12][13]) or Epiphany or Lynx or even Brendan Eich's "Chromium if it was Anti-Woke" over Firefox, I'm not gonna try to change your mind, but you should do that for informed reasons. Mozilla Firefox remains the largest open source non-Chromium browser project; and in an era where WHATWG's "living" web standards dictate that only institutions are capable of producing performant and conformant web browsers, that invaluable engineering work should not be squandered. Mozilla do a lot of good for us.

(Also, one final note: Mozilla makes more than just Firefox. A VPN, an Email mask service, Thunderbird, Bugzilla, SpiderMonkey, pdf.js, MDN; and they still contribute heavily to their spin-off projects SeaMonkey [formerly the Mozilla Application Suite] and the Rust Programming Language, as well as plenty of third party FOSS projects. Almost all of these are the same or better than the peer products produced by their competitors.)

[1] https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/blob/main/toolkit/content/license.html
[2] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#MPL-2.0
[3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00197.html
[4] https://opensource.org/license/MPL-2.0
[5] https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/blob/main/LICENSE
[6] https://rustfoundation.org/policy/rust-trademark-policy/
[7] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html
[8] https://web.archive.org/web/20110817064956/http://apcmag.com/the_stoush_over_linux_distributions_using_the_firefox_trademark.htm
[9] https://www.pcworld.com/article/419749/iceweasel-will-be-renamed-firefox-as-relations-between-debian-and-mozilla-thaw.html
[10] https://www.techradar.com/computing/firefox-responds-to-ai-backlash-by-promising-a-kill-switch-for-turning-off-controversial-new-features
[11] https://www.palemoon.org/
[12] https://icecatbrowser.org/index.html
[13] https://support.torproject.org/tor-browser/getting-started/about-tor-browser/

linux-opinions

good take op, love a well-sourced rant that I learn some things from 👍