the

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
iamdaduckboi
polarity-disturbed

With the sheer number of A Christmas Carol adaptations in existence, it is honestly astonishing how many of them miss the point.

Scrooge was not cartoonishly evil. He was not a mustache twirling villain who delighted in cruelty for its own sake. He was not out there kicking puppies or dumping water on the poor for fun. He was a miser, yes, but more importantly, he was comfortable. He lived securely within a system that worked for him, and because it worked for him, he assumed it must be working as intended.

He thought poverty was simply how the world worked. Tragic, perhaps, but natural. Like bad weather or illness or old age. Unfortunate, but not something he was personally responsible for addressing. And because it was not his responsibility, it was not his problem.

And that is the point.

That mindset was enough to warrant a supernatural intervention. The failure is not active cruelty, it is passive indifference. It is looking around at suffering and deciding it is inevitable. It is believing that kindness is optional if you have technically fulfilled your obligations.

But making him cartoonishly villainous makes the story easier to swallow. It creates distance. It lets the audience point and laugh, or scold, or feel morally superior. That kind of Scrooge is obviously not us. He is too exaggerated, too cruel, too ridiculous to be relatable. And that's comforting.

The problem is that Dickens did not write a monster. He wrote a mirror. Scrooge is unsettling precisely because people can see themselves in him, or at least see the logic of his thinking. If you turn him into a caricature, you let the people who most need to hear the story off the hook. They can say, well, "I am not that bad," and stop there.