Made another video on Vivziepop.
Here's the document it's based on:

Of course, there's a chance that Vivziepop and Dani did NOT see the '16' in the bio however, you should really be publicly attacking someone for *check notes* liking a ship as well as being critical towards the series.
Not everyone is going to like you or your stuff and that's okay as long as no one is harassing you or attacking you either.. I'm personally not a HuskerDust fan, I honestly miss Husk's old design where his wings would have little heart, clubs, diamonds ect shapes in them but I understood why his design was changed so that he is a little bit easier for animators to animate.
But yeah tldr: Do not attack people for liking a ship and being critical ESPECIALLY if their a minor.
Which side note, kids shouldn't be watching Hazbin hotel or Helluva boss for OBVIOUS reasons.
https://x.com/i/status/2000614854541914163
Oh man I love this one. I love how the critics and decent fans come up with good jokes while making fun of Vivziepop. I mean Vivziepop did say in an interview that she based Charlie off of herself, I can definitely see her attacking anyone even minors online for criticizing her hotel in the show. I did see that one commenter said that they're waiting for an arc where Charlie builds a cult following where they start doxing anyone who disagrees with her.
Technically, they're not wrong, Charlie has been shown to be spoiled and bratty despite that she's a grown ass adult especially where she says "I'm the princess of hell!" after being kicked out of the news station studio is anything to go by. Vivziepop is extremely immature for her age being 32 iirc just like the main girl in the series who mind you in demon years is 200 years old (she physically looks like in her 20s). It's no wonder why both are very unlikable.
I think Caine(TADC) is a great example of when you take things to far, unlike Charlie(HH) and the only reason for that is writing.
Both of them are clueless of how people work. Both what people to like them and their ideas.Both clearly don’t know when to stop or get into people space. Both are powerful people. Both of them “ means well”, both use peoples trauma to get their way.
The only difference is that, the narrative treats treats their actions very differently. For Charlie the show doesn’t really question her ideas, or change her, or even punish her in any way shape or form. Like her redeeming sinners and her only excuse is that they did one bad thing so it shouldn’t be a big deal. Basically not thinking of the victims of those sinners actions.
Look as Sir Pentious he got into hell because he didn’t tell anyone about a killer. Yet he’s the victim because he feels guilty about it, but not the 5 women who were killed. He doesn’t even get to meet any of the victims and gives them an apology. Because he’s a good guy for sacrificing myself. 
Now look at Caine from the very beginning of the series no one really like Caine and we got to see why. His Adventures are way to hard or makes zero sense his terms for mature adventure is put everyone into a “the last of use” or “ resident evil adventure. He can’t handle criticism or even allowing anyone to have their own fun. I can go on and on.
Let’s not forget how she keeps failing on Angle dust and instead of him leaving the hotel because of Charlie actions he left for something that wasn’t even his fault.
But he never put his hands into anyone until the last episode were it’s reveal that yes. Caine have cause the abstracting to people before by messing with people though and members. After this episode all the Caine’s fan can agree enough is enough and can is being a villain now. Even if he didn’t really meant to hurt anyone he still cause it and chose to avoid it.
To keep it short one sugar coat one character’s actions. the other don’t.
Thank you and have a nice day 
I LOVE this comparison so much and how one is handled gracefully while the other is barely acknowledged at all.
The way Charlie is handled just makes it look like Vivzie is projecting how she feels about people criticizing her shows and making them look like the bad guys while she's a victim. Charlie's views and beliefs are never challenged in any meaningful way and when she figured out that a way to possibly redeem sinners is to "face their sins" makes her look like a moron for never coming to that conclusion earlier.
While with Caine, it's clear that he's meant to be someone we're not supposed to entirely like. It's made clear by both the show and Goose that he doesn't understand how humans and emotions work, that doesn't excuse his more fucked up actions and makes it clear that the things he does is fucked up and doesn't excuse or have characters say "Well he's clearly trying! So he MUST care!"
And with the latest episode, any little trust the characters had for him is COMPLETELY shattered beyond repair and might even start to rebel against him from what was revealed.
your charlie kinda reminds me of pomni a lil bit, honestly pomni would've been charlie if she was written as an actual protaganist and not some over emotional crybaby that gets side linded
also I want to admit that Pomni is good in conversations and understands how to talk with people in stress 🫵
show!Charlie in TADC is Caine, but show and characters handle him as it should be (nobody thinks that his therapy helps them, nobody like him)
did you see blackishhh's new video on sai? its very 19/20-year-old of him. its so hard to take him seriously he edits like a ytp. its like a step down from that gone fishing person and not as obnoxious. i was too busy laughing at oddness of jewish sai (because she's neutral on palestine i assume) thumbnail and "niggerposting" (?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!!?!?!!?! im black i can say it just. what? do u want ur video taken down?) and the absurdist nature of it all i didnt digest any of it to heart :C he also didnt touch on anything you or thetepes or anyone else really went thru with sai it was mainly just covering sai and anthony. like hes funny otherwise which is why im subbed but i just. what?
I'll be honest I don't really know who Blackishhh is. Like I know of him, I've seen him mentioned a few times.
I'm not really following any of the chatter, like outside of what I'm sent tbh. And anything I end up watching based on my own curiosity.
And uh-- okay, I don't know what he said, I'm going off of what you're telling me right now-- I. . . Personally don't blame people at this point to assuming Sai is a zionist. Based on everything else, I understand why no one is willing to give her the benefit of the doubt on that.
Do I think she is? No. I think she, if anything, has demonstrated she's totally lost when it comes to what's going on with the Palestinian genocide. Which isn't a . . . Surprise to me. But.
I genuinely fear me saying that is going to immediately trigger ten people sending me screenshots of her being an obvious zionist-- and if those exist, I'll eat my words lol.
(Yes I've seen the 'From the River to the Sea' post. As I currently understand it though that slogan has been widely accepted by the pro-Palestine movement and I am in support of it personally. But, it is not totally agreed upon as productive even among Palestinians and anti-zonist jews in the movement. That's going to happen with any rallying cry in a political moment though.
Do I think Sai knows that? No. But her having disagreements with it 'sending an aggressive message' or whatever is very predictable to her typical liberal fencesitting. Or she's literally that committed to being anti-Hasan she'll use that to suggest he's an asshole too. Aggravating but . . .
I don't know guys. You tell me. I'm really not an authority here. My opinions here are genocide bad. Apartheid bad. American puppet states bad. If this is a bad take you're welcome to yell at me in the anons over it. I'll for sure hear you out.
Free Palestine. From the river to the sea.)
But uh-- yeah. Anti-seminitsm ain't cute broskies. Even with a pro-palestine tag on it. The Jewish diaspora is not Israel. The Israeli people are not Israel. No Nick Fuentesing. Bad. Naughty. Don't make me take out the spray bottle.
On the topic of me and Sheev (thetepes)-- honestly it wouldn't surprise me at all if no one covers what I've been talking about ever.
I mean we're kinda nobody. Totally auxiliary. Sheev is slightly more notable than me as a mod, but.
Honestly I'd be shocked if any channels covering this know I exist? And even then I'm just kinda a rando.
But uh. . . I don't know. If any youtubers are reading this-- eh, bonjour vous gars? Je suppose? Uh if you want anything summarized or to message me feel free. I'm an open book. I'm willing to chat with whoever. I'm not going to talk shit where I don't feel it's warranted and you're not going to be able to egg me into saying something harsher than I already have been. But I'll be honest, so.
But uh-- yeah, ghost, even if Opp block or Beckett or Blackishhh or fucking Lio or whoever else know who I am, I'm not really being mean enough here to be worth it to acknowledge me probably.
Like that's not even intended as a dig. This is content they're producing. And I have some disagreements with some of their approaches, but genuinely I don't think anything I'm saying or my perspective is relavent or interesting enough for them to include. Like, from a content perspective. I'd be the equivalent of one of the million randos KP included in her Saber video. It's fine.
srry i was writing a course paper
i luv slugs
The White House just launched a “Media Offenders” list.
On the official WhiteHouse.gov website.
Not a campaign page.
Not an RNC graphic.
The government’s actual website.
They’re listing reporters by name.
They’re accusing news outlets of “offenses.”
They’re stamping “EXPOSED” over every independent newsroom.
They built a leaderboard for “repeat offenders.”
Like journalism is some sort of crime and sport.
This is not “messaging.”
This is not “spin.”
This is state-run media targeting,
and we have never seen anything like it in the United States.
Ever.
They’re calling Mark Kelly’s PSA “follow the law” sedition.
They’re calling journalists who report it criminals.
They’re building narrative infrastructure for repressing dissent
All while a former TV host is being accused of unlawful killings.
You don’t put reporters on a government enemies list unless you’re planning to do something with the list.
This is authoritarian architecture.
And they just published it out in the open.
So while I didn't dislike the season of Hazbin, it definitely could have benefited from having more episodes. Lute was also heavily underutilized despite the build up from 'Gravity'. Would have also liked to have seen Charlie cut loose at least once and throw some hands rather than getting finessed by multiple characters all season and not get a single fight.
I wish Charlie fought Vox ngl
All season we had these two characters be compared and contrasted, how their desire for validation and self esteem issues are formed wit how they project and deal with them. How these flaws had ended up pushing away those they love the most, but whereas Charlie managed to fix her relationship with Vaggie through acknowledgement, Vox kept digging and digging until he found himself in a hole by himself.
So why not have these two face off against each other in the end? Yes, Charlie is a lot stronger than Vox, but that's why you get creative. Vox using the weapon powered by her father after she got him on the back foot would be interesting because finally Charlie can get hurt, the playing field is a bit more even.
It's also the main protagonist vs the main antagonist. But we get nothing from their interactions besides the way to drive Alastor's plot and story. Charlie has nothing to gain from her own story besides being used as a prop for Vox vs Alastor, and I'm sick to death of her being shafted of so much interesting storytelling for the show's blorbos.
Like don't get me wrong, Charlie had spent most of the season pissing me off because of how the story was treating her and her behaviour. The final nail in the coffin was her inviting Angel's abusers into the hotel and not immediately kicking them out when he specifically asked her not to have them here for very valid reasons.
But she is a fictional character. Charlie didn't do this, the writers wrote her to do this. They're the ones refusing to give her character meaningful storytelling and consequences, so they get the shit stick.
In a truck stop bathroom washing my hands today and 2 boys, looked about 5 and 9, came in with their little sister who looked maybe 2. The following whispered conversation made my entire day
"We have to wait, there's a lady in here!"
"That's not a lady, he has a mustache! We can be in here!"
"Some ladies have mustaches! And she has boobs!"
"Well some guys have boobs! Like Uncle Jake!"
"Uncle Jake is fat!"
At this point I could not contain a chuckle and both whirled around with identical looks of panic on their faces. I smiled and said "it's alright for you guys to be in here so your sister has help, don't worry. And I'm both! That's why I have boobs and a mustache. Some folks are just built that way"
(In unison) "Ooooooh!"
(older boy) "So do you use Sir or Ma'am or both?"
"Both, but I prefer Sir"
"Cool! Well thanks Sir! We have to help our sister now!"
This was in a small town country truck stop and both boys had "Murica" type stuff on and neither of them had any issue at all with these concepts. Their mom approached me while I was in line about 10 minutes later and apologized for them bothering me in the bathroom (they had told her about the interaction) and she and I had a lovely little chat too. I got to introduce her to the term "intersex" and her reply was "I think I've heard of that before! I didn't know that was the word for it. Amazing how many different ways God can make people!"
Sometimes the world is good. More often than you might think, if you give it a chance. It's not all bad loves <3
things you DO NOT need to be a man
things you DO need to be a man
^this post was brought to you by LGBT^
Let's
Get down to
Business
To defeat the huns