Summary
C3 glomerulopathy refers to those renal lesions characterized histologically by predominant C3 accumulation within the glomerulus, and pathogenetically by aberrant regulation of the alternative pathway of complement. Dense deposit disease is distinguished from other forms of C3 glomerulopathy by its characteristic appearance on electron microscopy. The extent to which dense deposit disease also differs from other forms of C3 glomerulopathy in terms of clinical features, natural history, and outcomes of treatment including renal transplantation is less clear. We discuss the pathophysiology of C3 glomerulopathy, with evidence for alternative pathway dysregulation obtained from affected individuals and complement factor H (Cfh)-deficient animal models. Recent linkage studies in familial C3 glomerulopathy have shown genomic rearrangements in the Cfh-related genes, for which the novel pathophysiologic concept of Cfh deregulation has been proposed.
Keywords: C3 glomerulopathy, dense deposit, complement
In 1962 the renal pathologist, Berger, and electron microscopist, Galle, published the first description of dense deposit disease (DDD), based on needle biopsies performed in three patients at the Necker Hospital in Paris.1 They later extended their observations to a total of 14 patients.2 DDD is a rare lesion, so named because of the appearance on electron microscopy (EM) of extremely dark, ribbon-like, electron-dense material in the central layer (lamina densa) of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). Deposits also may occur in the mesangium, Bowman’s capsule, and tubular basement membrane. DDD has variable morphology on light microscopy (LM), with a mesangioproliferative3 or membranoproliferative4, 5 appearance being most common. Other patterns including endocapillary proliferative and crescentic are described in both native disease and post-transplant recurrence.6 DDD is therefore a more accurate name for this lesion than membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) type 2.7 Immunofluorescence (IF) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) typically shows intense glomerular C3 staining with little or no immunoglobulin (Ig).8 However, this appearance is not specific for DDD, with one early French series of 49 patients with MPGN comprising 15 patients with isolated or predominant glomerular C3 staining, of whom only 5 patients had intramembranous dense deposits characteristic of DDD.9 In a 2007 French series of 19 patients, Servais et al10 introduced the term C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) to describe isolated glomerular C3 without intramembranous deposits. Accordingly, the term C3 glomerulopathy was proposed11 for all glomerular lesions, including DDD, that are characterized by predominant C3 accumulation within the glomerulus using IF/IHC. The presence of predominant or isolated C3 accumulation suggests activation of the alternative pathway (AP) of complement, and many cases of C3 glomerulopathy show genetic or acquired AP dysregulation.
Recognizable entities within C3 glomerulopathy include those with characteristic morphologic appearances (DDD and electron-dense intramembranous GBM transformation) and those with clear etiology (complement factor H-related 5 [CFHR5] nephropathy and the presence of an abnormal CFHR5 protein). Because postinfectious GN typically is characterized by a reversible decrease in serum C3 and the presence of glomerular C3 without Ig, differentiation from C3 glomerulopathy sometimes may be possible only with knowledge of the clinical course. In a number of cases in which there has been persistent renal disease after diagnosis of postinfectious GN, AP abnormalities have been detected and subsequent biopsy specimens were consistent with C3 glomerulopathy.12, 13, 14, 15 This includes a report of a young girl with acute post-streptococcal GN and low serum C3 levels in whom recurrent macroscopic hematuria prompted biopsy examinations 9 and 20 months after the initial presentation.12 The biopsy specimens showed MPGN, with IHC showing capillary wall and mesangial C3 without Ig or C1q, and EM showing intramembranous and mesangial deposits. A heterozygous sequence variant in the CFHR5 gene, in which duplication of a single nucleotide resulted in a premature stop codon, later was identified in the girl and her unaffected mother. Notwithstanding some common pathogenetic associations, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is not considered a C3 glomerulopathy because endothelial injury usually is seen without significant C3 deposition or electron-dense deposits.16
Histologic Features
Electron-dense deposits are seen within the glomerulus in all forms of C3 glomerulopathy. DDD is defined by the intramembranous location of these deposits, their intensely osmiophilic appearance forming ribbons, and the associated transformation of the GBM (Fig. 1). Confirmation of DDD requires EM, although the diagnosis can be suspected with a high degree of confidence if the typical LM and IF/IHC features are present. The distinction between DDD and C3GN is sometimes difficult even using EM,17, 18, 19 with debates about the extent of intramembranous deposits required for EM diagnosis of DDD.20 Furthermore, because the ribbons of DDD typically are discontinuous and may be more prominent in some capillary loops than others, they may be missed as a result of biopsy sampling error, leading to a diagnosis of C3GN. Such discrepancies may be important in the context of prognostic or therapeutic studies comparing outcomes in DDD and C3GN.
Figure 1.
Renal histology in individuals with DDD. (A) Light microscopy with silver stain showing a membranoproliferative pattern with double contours of the GBM. (B) Immunofluorescence and (C) immunohistochemistry with immunoperoxidase showing strong capillary wall staining of C3 and some granular mesangial C3. (D) Characteristic sausage-like, intramembranous, osmiophilic deposits on electron microscopy. Reprinted with permission from Dr. C. Nast.
The ultrastructural characteristics of C3GN are less clearly defined, other than by the absence of the hallmarks of DDD (Fig. 2). In the original French C3GN series by Servais et al,10 two main histologic groups were described. The first group had typical features of MPGN type 1, with mesangial proliferation, double contours, and subendothelial, mesangial, and (less commonly) subepithelial deposits. The second group lacked mesangial proliferation, a membranoproliferative pattern, or subendothelial deposits. EM was performed in only two patients (confirming the absence of dense intramembranous deposits).10 This series recently was updated to provide data on 29 DDD patients, 56 C3GN patients, and 49 MPGN type 1 patients (both adults and children).21 Occasionally, the EM appearance of C3GN closely resembles that previously described as a subtype of MPGN type 3 by Strife et al.22 In CFHR5 nephropathy, histologic appearances (Fig. 2E and F) include mesangial and/or capillary wall C3 deposits on IF; a normal or mesangioproliferative pattern on LM; and mesangial, subendothelial, and occasional subepithelial deposits of only moderate density on EM. Subepithelial deposits may in fact be present in all types of C3 glomerulopathy, sometimes with so-called humps identical to those characteristically seen in postinfectious GN. In one DDD series, paramesangial subepithelial deposits correlated with low serum C3 owing to C3 nephritic factor (C3NeF) activity23 and were composed of C3c.24 Laser microdissection and mass spectrometry of glomerular tissue has shown a similar proteomic profile for DDD25 and C3GN17 that includes alternative and terminal pathway complement components.
Figure 2.
Renal histology in individuals with C3GN. (A) Light microscopy showing a membranoproliferative pattern with segmental endocapillary neutrophil infiltration. (B) Electron microscopy showing moderately dense capillary wall and mesangial deposits. (C) Light microscopy showing mesangial expansion and (D) immunoperoxidase showing mesangial C3 in the same individual. (E) Immunoperoxidase showing granular capillary wall C3, in this case without conspicuous mesangial deposits, and (F) electron microscopy showing predominantly subendothelial deposits (and a transmembranous deposit) in an individual with CFHR5 nephropathy.
Clinical Features
DDD has an estimated prevalence of 2 to 3 per million population26 and traditionally is viewed as a diagnosis of childhood and young adulthood.27 Several series have shown a significantly younger mean age at diagnosis among DDD patients compared with MPGN types 1/328, 29, 30 or C3GN.21 However, some DDD cohorts have comprised numerous older patients,31 including one recent US series of 18 adults and 14 children in which 39% of adults were older than age 60 at diagnosis.4 Although this study and several others30, 32, 33, 34 found that DDD was almost twice as common in females as males, some have found the opposite,35, 36 whilst the majority of studies have found no differences between males and females with DDD3, 5, 21, 27, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 or C3GN.21, 42 Native renal manifestations of C3 glomerulopathy are diverse and nonspecific, with hypertension, hematuria, proteinuria (with or without nephrotic syndrome), and renal failure all reported. Most studies have found no difference in presenting features between DDD and MPGN type 1.28, 29, 32, 38, 40 However, nephrotic syndrome was approximately twice as common in MPGN type 1 as either DDD or C3GN in the recently updated French C3 glomerulopathy series.21
In CFHR5 nephropathy, persistent microscopic hematuria with or without episodes of synpharyngitic macroscopic hematuria (clinically identical to those seen in IgA nephropathy43) is the usual presentation. Identical features occasionally have been reported in DDD patients,34, 44 in whom the clinical and histologic overlap with acute postinfectious GN suggests that intercurrent infection is important in renal injury when AP dysregulation is present. Thus, symptoms of respiratory tract infection preceding renal symptoms have been described in children (not usually adults) with DDD,4, 5, 17, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46 sometimes in association with increased anti–streptolysin O titers.17, 38, 41, 46
Nonrenal manifestations of DDD include ocular drusen, acquired partial lipodystrophy (PLD), type 1 diabetes mellitus, and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Ocular drusen are lipoproteinaceous deposits of complement-containing debris between the basal surface of the retinal pigment endothelium and Bruch’s membrane. The clinical association of ocular drusen with DDD was first reported in 1989,47 and appears to be related to structural and functional similarities between Bruch’s membrane, a multilaminar extracellular matrix that separates the retina from the blood vessels in the choroid, and the GBM. Ocular drusen are also a manifestation of age-related macular degeneration (AMD),48 the leading cause of blindness in the industrialized world, for which a number of shared genetic risk factors with DDD are discussed later. However, unlike AMD, drusen in patients with DDD are said to occur at a young age and to be associated with only a modest risk of progressive visual loss.49 In the recent therapeutic trial of eculizumab in DDD and C3GN, among several patients identified as having ocular drusen, one patient had C3GN.50
PLD involves loss of subcutaneous fat from the face and upper body. An association with GN was first noted in 1958.51 Early reports of PLD in patients with DDD52 and C3NeF-associated MPGN (without EM)53 were followed by several MPGN cohorts in which PLD was associated specifically with DDD.29, 31, 38 In the updated French C3 glomerulopathy series, PLD was noted only in the DDD group,21 affecting 17% of DDD patients (versus <5% in other recent DDD cohorts26, 54). However, in an early PLD series comprising six patients with MPGN (all having C3NeF and low serum C3 levels), one patient had only subendothelial deposits on EM.55 Moreover, the Necker hospital group reported two patients with PLD and MPGN in whom IF was positive for both C3 and IgG.56 In a 2004 literature review of PLD, MPGN was the most common associated renal lesion, but only slightly more than half of MPGN cases were shown to be DDD, with MPGN types 1/3 also represented.57 In the majority of cases of PLD, including those associated with low serum C3 levels, renal disease was not found.57 A significantly increased risk of diabetes mellitus type 1 was reported in patients and families with DDD in a US questionnaire-based study of 98 patients (although ascertainment bias cannot be excluded).39 It has been suggested that MGUS is associated with DDD4, 58, 59 and C3GN,18, 60 and that it may confer a poor renal prognosis.
Prognosis
Progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), despite treatment, is said to occur in approximately half of patients with a diagnosis of DDD of 10 or more years.31, 34, 49, 61, 62 In the recently updated French C3 glomerulopathy series, overall 10-year progression to ESKD was 36.5% (with a mean follow-up period of 11 years).21 No significant difference was seen between the three diagnostic categories (DDD, C3GN, and MPGN type 1). This is consistent with the finding in earlier MPGN cohort studies that DDD was not more likely than other forms of MPGN to progress to ESKD.7, 29, 31, 40, 63, 64, 65 Other series found that an apparent increase in ESKD rates probably was confounded by a higher incidence of crescents30, 38 or reduced GFR61 at diagnosis in the DDD versus non-DDD patient groups.
The impact of clinical or histologic variables on outcomes of C3 glomerulopathy has been assessed in numerous retrospective cohort studies. In the two most recent DDD cohorts, reduced GFR at diagnosis was associated significantly on multivariate analysis with progression to ESKD.4, 21 In CFHR5 nephropathy, in which progressive disease is characterized by hypertension, proteinuria, and chronic renal failure, ESKD has been reported in 18 of 91 carriers (or 20%) of the heterozygous CFHR5 gene mutation. Of these, 14 were men and 4 were women, a difference that remains unexplained. No other features have been shown consistently to correlate with disease outcomes in DDD or other forms of C3 glomerulopathy. This is partly because of the limited number of end points that can be assessed in mostly small cohorts. In the updated French C3 glomerulopathy cohort,21 adults with DDD had significantly reduced renal survival compared with children with DDD, adults with C3GN, and adults with MPGN type 1. However, the DDD adult subgroup comprised only 11 patients, and because other differences between these subgroups were not assessed it is difficult to determine if this was a robust conclusion. For some variables, including the presence of crescents on the diagnostic biopsy specimen (found to predict a rapid progression to ESKD in some DDD cohorts38, 66 but not others4, 29, 35), it now seems especially clear that prognostic value cannot be assessed adequately through retrospective cohort analyses. This is exemplified by the US DDD cohort study in which it was suggested that the reason crescents did not correlate with outcomes may have been the increased use of immunosuppressants in such patients.4
Pathogenesis
C3 Nephritic Factors
Reduced serum C3 (but not C4) is consistent with AP dysregulation, but is neither sensitive nor specific for the diagnosis of DDD/C3GN. In recent cohort studies, isolated low C3 level was found in only a proportion of patients with DDD4, 21 and C3GN.21, 42 C3NeF, first described in a patient with “persistent hypocomplementemic glomerulonephritis,”67 is an autoantibody that binds to a neoepitope on C3bBb, the C3 convertase of the AP, stabilizing it against complement factor H (Cfh)-mediated decay and prolonging its C3-cleaving action.68 A second type of C3NeF was found to display slower C3 and C5 activation69 and dependence on properdin for convertase stabilization.70 It has been reported in very small series that properdin-dependent C3NeFs are more characteristic of MPGN types 170, 71 and 3,70 whereas properdin-independent C3NeFs are found more often in DDD and PLD.71
In the updated French C3 glomerulopathy cohort,21 C3NeFs were significantly more common in patients with DDD than C3GN or MPGN type 1 (consistent with earlier studies29, 31, 72). Patients with C3NeFs also had generally lower C3 levels (although C3 was normal in ~40% of patients with C3NeF). Here, as in most DDD/C3GN studies, serum C3 levels and the presence of C3NeF did not correlate with disease outcomes. The identification of C3NeFs in patients with other forms of GN and in healthy individuals (discussed in one recent study73) underlines a lack of specificity. In CFHR5 nephropathy, C3 levels typically are normal and C3NeF is absent.74
Autoantibodies that bind to native factor B (Cfb) and stabilize the AP C3 convertase75 or target both Cfb and C3b76 also have been described in patients with DDD. An early report showed that circulating monoclonal Ig λ light chain dimers were able to activate the AP.77 The λ light chain dimers were found to bind short consensus repeat (SCR) 3 on the Cfh molecule, blocking one of its C3b interaction sites.78 Subsequently, anti-Cfh autoantibodies have been identified in patients with DDD59, 73, 79 and C3GN.17, 18
Family Studies
Renal biopsy data for a number of family studies in C3 glomerulopathy are shown in Table 1. These studies indicate a genetic basis for a small number of C3 glomerulopathy cases, although the genetic defect has been characterized and an underlying pathogenic mechanism proposed in only a handful of families. These include cases associated with homozygous Cfh deficiency or homozygous loss-of-function Cfh mutation, heterozygous gain-of-function C3 mutation, and CFHR mutations leading to enhanced Cfh deregulation (summarized later and in Figure 3). Two Algerian brothers of consanguineous parents were reported with severe Cfh deficiency and autosomal-recessive “atypical DDD” as shown on EM by discontinuous intramembranous deposits.44 Renal disease presented during infancy with intermittent macroscopic hematuria and infections (including pharyngitis) together with failure to thrive and developmental delay in the younger sibling. Both brothers were negative for C3NeF but had very low serum levels of C3, Cfb, properdin, and C5 with normal classic pathway components. A homozygous missense mutation in SCR 7 of the Cfh gene, causing a substitution of a cysteine with a serine residue, subsequently was identified in the elder brother.80 Both parents and two other children without renal disease had half-normal Cfh levels, consistent with heterozygosity. A young girl presenting with recurrent macroscopic hematuria and undetectable serum C3, Cfb, and Cfh was found to have C3GN with a mesangioproliferative pattern and predominant mesangial deposits on EM.81 A homozygous missense mutation was detected on SCR 16 of Cfh that resulted in a cysteine to serine change. Both unaffected parents were heterozygous for the Cfh mutation and displayed low-normal Cfh levels, while an unaffected sister had two normal Cfh alleles and high-normal Cfh levels. Intriguingly, an earlier report concerned a patient with severe Cfh deficiency in association with type 3 collagen glomerulopathy82 (more likely representing chronic thrombotic microangiopathy16) in whom a different homozygous missense mutation was identified at the same site on SCR 16.83 The substitution of a cysteine residue (in this case with a tyrosine) altered the secondary structure of the Cfh protein, resulting in its nonsecretion.84 A young girl was reported with macroscopic hematuria, very low C3 and Cfh levels, and endocapillary GN with predominant glomerular C3.85 A homozygous missense mutation on SCR 2, causing an exchange of proline to serine, was apparently the result of paternal isodisomy. The patient also was homozygous for a risk haplotype for the membrane cofactor protein (MCP) gene (discussed later).86
Table 1.
Renal Biopsy Data in Family Studies of C3 Glomerulopathy
![]() |
Figure 3.
Disease mechanisms in C3 glomerulopathy, based on genetic defects identified in family studies. (A) Physiological regulation of C3 activation to C3b via the alternative pathway is mediated by Cfh. Competitive inhibition of Cfh by CFHR proteins is termed Cfh deregulation. (B) Homozygous deficiency or dysfunction of Cfh results in excessive C3 activation. (C) Hyperfunctional C3 produces excessive C3 activation despite normal Cfh activity. (D) Abnormal CFHR proteins enhance Cfh deregulation, leading to excessive C3 activation.
Two young daughters of consanguineous Turkish parents had C3GN with low C3, positive C3NeF, and only slightly reduced serum Cfh levels.87, 88 A loss-of-function homozygous mutation in Cfh involving deletion of a single codon in SCR 4 was found to produce a circulating mutant Cfh protein with impaired binding to C3b, defective decay accelerating activity, and reduced factor I (Cfi) cofactor activity. Both patients also were homozygous for the DDD/AMD-associated Y402H Cfh polymorphism (discussed later). A mother and her twin adult sons had DDD in association with half-normal C3 and Cfb levels and normal Cfh levels.89 A gain-of-function heterozygous mutation of the C3 gene involving deletion of two codons was found to produce a hyperfunctional C3 protein. Mutant C3 was unable to be activated by the C3 convertase of the AP. However, after its conversion by proteases to C3b or by spontaneous hydrolysis of the internal thioester (C3 tickover) to C3(H2O), it formed a C3 convertase that was resistant to regulation by Cfh. This resulted in accelerated breakdown of wild-type C3 that appeared to be restricted to the fluid phase, because regulation in vitro by decay accelerating factor (DAF, a surface-expressed complement regulatory protein) was intact. Similarly, mutant C3b and C3(H2O) did not undergo Cfi-mediated proteolysis in the fluid phase (being dependent on Cfh cofactor activity), whereas proteolysis proceeded efficiently in the presence of MCP.
In CFHR5 nephropathy, multiplex-ligation probe amplification enabled the identification of a novel heterozygous mutation in the CFHR5 gene involving internal duplication of the initial two N-terminal SCRs in two affected families originally from the Troodos region of Cyprus.74 The finding of a common mutation in these families suggested a founder effect, and subsequently diagnostic polymerase chain reaction enabled the identification of numerous additional affected individuals and families from all over Cyprus (some with a previous diagnosis of MPGN type 1). A total of 91 carriers of the same heterozygous founder mutation from 16 apparently unrelated Greek-Cypriot families was later reported, with a disease penetrance of 90%.90 An Irish family was first reported with autosomal-dominant MPGN type 391 (now reclassified as C3 glomerulopathy) and linkage to the regulators of complement activation locus.92 A novel hybrid CFHR3-1 gene now has been identified encoding an abnormal CFHR3-1 protein in affected family members.93
Cfh Deregulation
Until recently, the biological role of the five CFHR proteins has been unclear, although the presence of polymorphisms involving homozygous deletion of CFHR genes (most commonly ΔCFHR3/1)102 in healthy populations suggested that the CFHR3 and CFHR1 proteins were nonessential. Recently, CFHR1, CFHR2, and CFHR5 have been shown to possess a common dimerization motif located within the highly conserved first two N-terminal SCRs of these particular CFHR proteins. It is now believed that, unlike Cfh, these CFHR proteins do not have any complement inhibiting actions in vivo. Rather, they compete with Cfh for binding to C3b, thereby enhancing C3 activation in a process termed Cfh deregulation.103 Both dimerization and deregulation have implications for understanding how CFHR proteins mediate autosomal-dominant C3 glomerulopathy. In CFHR5 nephropathy, the mutation results in the duplication of the dimerization motif and enables generation of large complexes that have enhanced deregulation.103 Enhanced deregulation also has been shown using serum containing the abnormal (hybrid) CFHR3-1 protein.103 The current paradigm is that there is either continuous or intermittent (eg, during infection) activation of C3 along the GBM that is controlled by Cfh. In the presence of abnormal CFHR proteins, enhanced deregulation of Cfh enables C3 to accumulate along the GBM. This paradigm would predict that a lack of CFHR proteins (eg, through the common ΔCFHR3/1 allele) would enhance Cfh action and become a protective factor in C3 glomerulopathy or complement-mediated disease in general. It also may explain the protective effect of ΔCFHR3/1 in AMD102, 104 and IgA nephropathy.105 Homozygous ΔCFHR3/1 was absent in one cohort of 68 DDD patients, despite a rate among healthy control subjects of 3%.26
Other Genetic Associations
Additional genetic variations in complement proteins and/or regulators have been identified using a candidate gene approach in individuals and cohorts with C3 glomerulopathy. Most of those in whom a rare genetic variant has been found have a family history of disease (and hence a higher pretest probability of genetically determined susceptibility). The relatively poor yield of genetic screening to date in nonfamilial cases is exemplified by the French C3 glomerulopathy cohort, in which mutations in one of three genes (Cfh, Cfi, and MCP) was reported in only 18% of all patients screened.21 Cfh mutations were the most common, occurring in 9 of 16 individuals with a family history, but in only 8 nonfamilial cases. Another remarkable finding in this study was of no overall difference in the proportion of patients with DDD, C3GN, and MPGN type 1 in whom mutations affecting complement regulatory proteins were found. Thus, patients with homozygous Cfh mutations were identified in DDD (as outlined earlier), C3GN (patient 3106), and MPGN type 1 (patient 2106 and case 1107). However, the bulk of mutations identified in the French cohort were heterozygous. Two patients treated with eculizumab in the recent therapeutic trial also had heterozygous mutations affecting Cfh and MCP.50 Unlike homozygous Cfh deficiency, for which an animal model exists (discussed later), the functional basis of heterozygous mutations in C3 glomerulopathy remains unclear, notwithstanding that some have shown a correlation with AP dysregulation in patients with aHUS. Of note, homozygous Cfi deficiency, first reported in a patient with extremely low C3 and increased susceptibility to infection,108 has not been reported in association with C3 glomerulopathy.
Screening of patient cohorts, followed by comparison with control populations, also identified common allelic variants that may modify risk of C3 glomerulopathy. Multiple genetic variants potentially conferring either increased risk or protection for C3 glomerulopathy and/or other complement-related phenotypes are said to define an individual’s complotype. Thus, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Cfh and C3 genes and a deletional copy number variation in C4A are associated with increased risk of DDD, whereas an SNP in CFHR5 is protective.109 An SNP in MCP also is associated with an increased risk of C3GN and MPGN type 1.21 At-risk haplotypes combining multiple SNPs in Cfh110 and C3109 have been delineated for DDD, together with a protective Cfh haplotype.110 An at-risk MCP haplotype for C3GN and MPGN type 1 and a protective MCP haplotype for DDD and C3GN also have been reported.21 In some, but not all, cases, functional studies showing AP dysregulation have provided evidence in support of the genetic association.111
In AMD, approximately 50% of the population-attributable risk is accounted for by common polymorphisms in the Cfh gene. Several AMD-associated Cfh sequence variants have been shown to confer a common susceptibility to DDD.112 One important example is the Y402H substitution of a histidine (H) for a tyrosine (Y) residue on SCR 7, strongly associated with both AMD110, 112 and DDD110 in Caucasian but not Asian populations. Functional studies have indicated that Y402H affects differential binding of Cfh to glycosaminoglycans within Bruch’s membrane and the glomerulus.113 An illustrative case relates to a 56-year-old man in whom ESKD developed as a result of DDD (without diagnostic EM), followed by new-onset AMD, causing eventual blindness.114 In this individual, genetic susceptibility to AMD and DDD derived from a heterozygous Cfh mutation in SCR 7, a homozygous risk haplotype comprising the H402 variant for SCR 7, and several other AMD risk factors.
Animal Models
Pigs115 and mice116, 117, 118, 119, 120 with homozygous Cfh deficiency have provided an important experimental model of DDD. In Norwegian Yorkshire piglets (now extinct), a lethal Cfh mutation occurred spontaneously and was associated with severe renal disease described as porcine MPGN type 2. Gene-targeted Cfh-deficient mice show AP dysregulation with extremely low plasma C3 levels.116 Cfh−/− mice develop albuminuria and MPGN, with significantly reduced survival compared with wild-type mice. In both models glomerular C3 without Ig is seen at an early stage and precedes the appearance on EM of capillary wall dense deposits. These electron-dense deposits are initially subendothelial rather than intramembranous, and show positive staining for C3 using immunoelectron microscopy. The absence of extraglomerular C3 is reminiscent of “atypical DDD,” as described in the family study of homozygous Cfh deficiency.44 Cfh−/− mice crossed with Cfb-deficient mice do not show low plasma C3 levels or glomerular changes, indicating that uncontrolled C3 activation via the AP is critical to renal pathogenesis. Injection into Cfh−/− mice of a single dose of purified murine119 or human120 Cfh restores plasma C3 levels to normal at 24 hours, accompanied by the resolution on IF of GBM C3 staining and the appearance of mesangial C3. In affected piglets, weekly plasma infusions containing Cfh also reduced the severity of GN and improved survival.121
The role of C5 in this phenotype was studied by crossing Cfh−/− mice with those lacking C5.117 Although spontaneous MPGN with capillary wall deposits was still observed, glomerular cellularity/crescents were reduced with improved renal function and reduced mortality. Cfh−/− mice with accompanying C5 deficiency also were less susceptible to renal injury induced by sheep nephrotoxic serum, whereas Cfh−/− mice with or without accompanying C6 deficiency showed an influx of neutrophils into the glomerulus. This suggests that the production of C5a rather than membrane attack complex (MAC) formation mediated renal damage. Cfh−/− mice injected with anti-C5 antibodies before administration of nephrotoxic serum also were protected, suggesting that anti-C5 therapy may be beneficial in human beings with C3 glomerulopathy owing to Cfh deficiency (eg, during disease flares). In mice with homozygous deficiency of Cfi, an inability to metabolize C3b results in uncontrolled AP activation and low circulating C3 levels. In Cfi−/− mice only C3b is evident in plasma, consistent with the C3 profile in human beings with total Cfi deficiency.122 Cfi−/− mice show mesangial C3 accumulation and nodular mesangial expansion, but without GBM C3 staining or features of MPGN. Unexpectedly, in mice with combined homozygous deficiency of Cfh and Cfi, both the plasma C3 profile and glomerular C3 pattern are identical to those seen in Cfi deficiency alone.118 Injection into Cfh−/−.Cfi−/− mice of a source of murine Cfi resulted in cleavage of C3b, generating fragments including iC3b. This was accompanied by loss of mesangial C3 staining, and the appearance of GBM C3 staining. It therefore appears that cleavage of C3b was critical for GBM C3 staining to occur, and that measures to prevent conversion of C3b to iC3b might be useful therapeutically in patients in whom GBM C3 accumulation is shown.
Recently, an additional aspect of renal pathogenesis was elucidated through the generation of mice with Cfh and properdin deficiency.123, 124 Because properdin prolongs the cleaving activity of the AP C3 convertase, it was hypothesized that genetic deficiency of properdin (as a positive regulator of the AP) would ameliorate the renal phenotype of Cfh deficiency. Unexpectedly, Cfh−/−.P−/− mice showed more severe MPGN and more intense GBM C3 staining than Cfh−/− mice.123 Plasma C3 levels did not differ between Cfh−/−.P−/− and Cfh−/− mice, although only Cfh−/−.P−/− mice showed (fractional amounts of) intact C3. Plasma C5 was absent in Cfh−/− mice (consistent with previous data125), but was detected at low levels in Cfh−/−.P−/− mice. One explanation for these observations is that higher levels of intact C3 in Cfh−/−.P−/− mice may increase the availability of iC3b in the circulation for accumulation along the GBM, whereas the increased availability of C5 also may contribute to the more severe glomerular inflammation seen in these mice. Although the predominant C3 depletion seen in Cfh−/−.P−/− mice closely resembles the C3 profile in human subjects with properdin-independent C3NeFs, the pattern of C3 and C5 depletion in Cfh−/− mice is analogous to properdin-dependent C3NeFs.
Treatment
No treatment has been proven to be beneficial in C3 glomerulopathy.
Antihypertensive/antiproteinuric therapy, particularly via renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers, generally is recommended in GN.126 Evidence in support of RAAS blockade in C3 glomerulopathy specifically is limited to retrospective cohort studies (which are subject to treatment bias). In the French C3 glomerulopathy cohort, RAAS blockade, but not use of immunosuppressants, was associated with a significant increase in renal survival,21 whereas in the US DDD cohort a nonsignificant reduction in progression to ESKD was found with combined RAAS blockade and steroids.4 After early reports of children with DDD in whom alternate-day steroids were associated with histologic regression,127 a 1992 randomized controlled trial showed clinical benefit in 70 children with MPGN, of whom 14 had DDD (without a subgroup analysis).128 In the absence of subsequent randomized controlled trials, reports purportedly showing response to steroids in DDD are complicated by the highly variable natural history, which includes rare occurrences of sustained clinical remission even without treatment.129, 130 Thus, in one pediatric series of likely C3 glomerulopathy, treatment with steroids, initiated on the basis of biopsy evidence of acute glomerular inflammation including crescents, led to clinical improvement in a number of cases.131 However, an identical improvement was seen in an untreated patient. Use of steroids and immunosuppressants may appear most justified in patients with C3 glomerulopathy who develop rapidly progressive GN (because this would prompt their use for other causes of GN). However, post-transplant recurrence of C3 glomerulopathy (including with crescents on biopsy, discussed later) and aHUS132 suggests that immunosuppression (as used in the transplant period) may be ineffective for AP-mediated renal disease. The iatrogenic risk of infection, potentially triggering complement activation and exacerbation of nephritis, also must be weighed. Treatment with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has been reported with success in a single case of DDD related to anti-Cfb/C3b autoantibodies.76 Immunosuppressive treatment for underlying hematologic malignancies including MGUS, in patients with associated C3 glomerulopathy, leading to improvement in renal parameters in some reports60 but not others,18 is not discussed here.
Restoration of normal AP regulation is a major goal of current research into treatment of C3 glomerulopathy. The animal models suggest that purified or recombinant Cfh replacement might be beneficial in Cfh-deficient patients. Although this therapy is not currently available, long-term plasma infusion was effective and well tolerated in the sisters with familial C3GN related to circulating mutant Cfh.87 Elsewhere plasma infusion/exchange has been reported with only mixed success, including in the setting of recurrent post-transplant DDD.133 A therapeutic role for anti-C5/C5a therapy in C3 glomerulopathy flares is suggested by experimental data in animal models and by the observation in DDD patients with rapidly progressive GN that the glomerular deposits contain C5.23 The C5-inhibitor eculizumab has been reported with success in several cases of DDD134, 135 (including a patient with post-transplant recurrence associated with renal failure136) and one of MPGN type 1.137 However, it also has been reported with failure in another DDD patient,134 and with mixed results in a recent prospective, uncontrolled trial in 6 adults with native or recurrent post-transplant DDD or C3GN.50 At the conclusion of a 1-year course of eculizumab, a clinical improvement was observed in three of the trial patients (two showing reduced inflammation on biopsy138). In the future, agents that either inhibit the C3 convertase of the AP or remove C3 (and/or C3 fragments) from the circulation may undergo evaluation (bearing in mind the key protective functions these molecules also perform in innate immunity).
Transplantation
Histologic recurrence of DDD after renal transplantation was first reported by Galle et al139 and is common.140 Histologic recurrence of C3GN probably also was described in older studies,141 with recent reports21, 42 including cases of CFHR5 nephropathy142 and the CFHR3/1 hybrid gene (in which the related donor also later developed C3 glomerulopathy).91 A US retrospective cohort of almost 8,000 pediatric transplant recipients, including 75 children with DDD, assessed the impact of histologic recurrence of DDD on graft survival.6 At 5 years, 50% of pediatric DDD recipients had viable grafts (comparable with the 45% rate identified in an accompanying literature review of 78 pediatric and adult DDD recipients). This was significantly lower than the pediatric graft survival rate of 74% in all-cause ESKD and 72% in non-DDD forms of GN. Of 29 graft failures in DDD recipients during the study period, 11 were attributed to recurrent disease (9 after deceased donor transplantation). However, the contribution of recurrent disease to the overall increase in pediatric graft failure rates in DDD recipients was not assessed, except in a subgroup of 29 of the DDD recipients. Here, 4 graft losses resulting from biopsy-proven recurrent disease represented a nonsignificant reduction in median graft survival. Of note, crescents were seen on graft biopsy only in those with evidence of DDD recurrence, and were significantly associated with reduced graft survival. Biopsy-proven recurrence was always accompanied by heavy proteinuria, but no clinical or laboratory variables predicted either DDD recurrence or graft loss. The investigators concluded that there was no correlation between the isolated recurrence of dense deposits and reduced graft survival.6
More recent studies include an Irish cohort of 33 patients with primary idiopathic MPGN in whom graft failure rates were reported only for those with biopsy-proven recurrence.30 This included 11 of a total of 18 transplants performed in recipients with (nonfamilial) DDD. The investigators concluded that 14 grafts lost to recurrent MPGN at a median of 7.5 years was likely to represent a reduction in graft half-life.30 In the US questionnaire-based DDD study comprising 22 mostly pediatric transplant recipients, 10 grafts were lost within the first 5 years (7 were attributed to recurrent disease).37 In one C3GN cohort, post-transplant recurrence in two individuals was heralded by increased creatinine levels, subnephrotic proteinuria, and low serum C3 levels.42 In CFHR nephropathy, 10 patients (mostly males) have been reported with successful transplantation (including a recipient whose female related donor was an asymptomatic carrier of the mutation), despite histologic recurrence in all three patients who underwent a biopsy.90, 142
Conclusions
DDD is distinguished histologically from other forms of C3 glomerulopathy by the presence of osmiophilic, intramembranous, ribbon-like deposits. Certain clinical features, including a young age at diagnosis and (in rare cases) an association with ocular drusen, are more typical of DDD than other forms of C3 glomerulopathy. A diagnosis of DDD does not appear to confer a worse renal prognosis compared with other forms of C3 glomerulopathy. Evidence for the role of AP dysregulation in C3 glomerulopathy is drawn from linkage studies in a small number of pedigrees, cohort studies showing an association with C3NeFs and complement regulatory gene variants, and animal models. Recently, linkage was shown for copy number variation across different CFHR genes in familial C3 glomerulopathy, and a new pathophysiologic concept of Cfh deregulation has been proposed. Because progression to ESKD and post-transplant recurrence is common in all forms of C3 glomerulopathy, therapies that target underlying disease mechanisms are urgently required.91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101
Footnotes
Financial support: Thomas Barbour is a Kidney Research UK Clinical Research Fellow (TF/2011), and Matthew Pickering is a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellow in Clinical Science (WT082291MA).
Conflict of interest statement: none.
References
- 1.Berger J., Galle P. Altération singulière des membranes basales du rein. J Urol Néphrol (Paris) 1962;68:116–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Berger J., Galle P. Dépôts denses au sein des membranes basales du rein: étude en microscopies optique et électronique. Presse Med. 1963;71:2351–2354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walker P.D., Ferrario F., Joh K., Bonsib S.M. Dense deposit disease is not a membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Mod Pathol. 2007;20:605–616. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nasr S.H., Valeri A.M., Appel G.B., Sherwinter J., Stokes M.B., Said S.M. Dense deposit disease: clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:22–32. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03480708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang J., Tang Z., Luo C., Hu Y., Zeng C., Chen H. Clinical and pathological features of dense deposit disease in Chinese patients. Clin Nephrol. 2012;78:207–215. doi: 10.5414/cn107363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Braun M.C., Stablein D.M., Hamiwka L.A., Bell L., Bartosh S.M., Strife C.F. Recurrence of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II in renal allografts: the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study experience. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:2225–2233. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005020175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Habib R., Kleinknecht C., Gubler M.C., Maïz H.B. Idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Morphology and natural history. Perspect Nephrol Hypertens. 1973;1:491–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Berger J., Yaneva H., Antoine B. Étude immunohistochimique des lésions glomérulaires. J Urol Néphrol (Paris) 1969;76:269–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bariéty J., Druet P., Loirat P., Lagrue G. Les glomérulonéphrites pariétoprolifératives glomerulonephritis (G.N.P.P). Étude histopathologique en microcopie optique, électronique et en immunohistochimie de 49 cas. Corrélations anatomocliniques. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1971;19:259–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Servais A., Frémeaux-Bacchi V., Lequintrec M., Salomon R., Blouin J., Knebelmann B. Primary glomerulonephritis with isolated C3 deposits: a new entity which shares common genetic risk factors with haemolytic uraemic syndrome. J Med Genet. 2007;44:193–199. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.045328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fakhouri F., Frémeaux-Bacchi V., Noël L.H., Cook H.T., Pickering M.C. C3 glomerulopathy: a new classification. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:494–499. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2010.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vernon K.A., Goicoechea de Jorge E., Hall A.E., Frémeaux-Bacchi V., Aitman T.J., Cook H.T. Acute presentation and persistent glomerulonephritis following streptococcal infection in a patient with heterozygous complement factor H-related protein 5 deficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60:121–125. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sandhu G., Bansal A., Ranade A., Jones J., Cortell S., Markowitz G.S. C3 glomerulopathy masquerading as acute postinfectious glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60:1039–1043. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sethi S., Fervenza F.C., Zhang Y., Zand L., Meyer N.C., Borsa N. Atypical postinfectious glomerulonephritis is associated with abnormalities in the alternative pathway of complement. Kidney Int. 2013;83:293–299. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meleg-Smith S. The many faces of C3 glomerulopathy. Kidney Int. 2012;82:611. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pickering M.C., Cook H.T. Translational mini-review series on complement factor H: renal diseases associated with complement factor H: novel insights from humans and animals. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;151:210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03574.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sethi S., Fervenza F.C., Zhang Y., Nasr S.H., Leung N., Vrana J. Proliferative glomerulonephritis secondary to dysfunction of the alternative pathway of complement. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:1009–1017. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07110810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bridoux F., Desport E., Frémeaux-Bacchi V., Chong C.F., Gombert J.M., Lacombe C. Glomerulonephritis with isolated C3 deposits and monoclonal gammopathy: a fortuitous association? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:2165–2174. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06180710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hawfield A., Iskandar S.S., Smith R.J. Alternative pathway dysfunction in kidney disease: a case report and review of dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulopathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61:828–831. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Strife CF, West CD, Witte DP. Crescentic glomerulonephritis in childhood: acute nonproliferative glomerulitis versus dense deposit disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:897; author reply 898. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Servais A., Noël L.H., Roumenina L.T., Le Quintrec M., Ngo S., Dragon-Durey M.A. Acquired and genetic complement abnormalities play a critical role in dense deposit disease and other C3 glomerulopathies. Kidney Int. 2012;82:454–464. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Strife C.F., McEnery P.T., McAdams A.J., West C.D. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with disruption of the glomerular basement membrane. Clin Nephrol. 1977;7:65–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.West C.D., Witte D.P., McAdams A.J. Composition of nephritic factor-generated glomerular deposits in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 2. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:1120–1130. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.24511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.West C.D., McAdams A.J. Paramesangial glomerular deposits in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II correlate with hypocomplementemia. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;25:853–861. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90567-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sethi S., Gamez J.D., Vrana J.A., Theis J.D., Bergen H.R., III, Zipfel P.F. Glomeruli of dense deposit disease contain components of the alternative and terminal complement pathway. Kidney Int. 2009;75:952–960. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smith R.J., Harris C.L., Pickering M.C. Dense deposit disease. Mol Immunol. 2011;48:1604–1610. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Galle P., Mahieu P. Electron dense alteration of kidney basement membranes. A renal lesion specific of a systemic disease. Am J Med. 1975;58:749–764. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(75)90631-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Donadio J.V., Jr, Slack T.K., Holley K.E., Ilstrup D.M. Idiopathic membranoproliferative (mesangiocapillary) glomerulonephritis: a clinicopathologic study. Mayo Clin Proc. 1979;54:141–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cameron J.S., Turner D.R., Heaton J., Williams D.G., Ogg C.S., Chantler C. Idiopathic mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. Comparison of types I and II in children and adults and long-term prognosis. Am J Med. 1983;74:175–192. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90606-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Little M.A., Dupont P., Campbell E., Dorman A., Walshe J.J. Severity of primary MPGN, rather than MPGN type, determines renal survival and post-transplantation recurrence risk. Kidney Int. 2006;69:504–511. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Swainson C.P., Robson J.S., Thomson D., MacDonald M.K. Mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis: a long-term study of 40 cases. J Pathol. 1983;141:449–468. doi: 10.1002/path.1711410404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bohle A., Gärtner H.V., Fischbach H., Bock K.D., Edel H.H., Frotscher U. The morphological and clinical features of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in adults. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1974;363:213–224. doi: 10.1007/BF00432802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Klein M., Poucell S., Arbus G.S., McGraw M., Rance C.P., Yoon S.J. Characteristics of a benign subtype of dense deposit disease: comparison with the progressive form of this disease. Clin Nephrol. 1983;20:163–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bennett W.M., Fassett R.G., Walker R.G., Fairley K.F., d'Apice A.J., Kincaid-Smith P. Mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis type II (dense-deposit disease): clinical features of progressive disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1989;13:469–476. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(89)80004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Antoine B., Faye C. The clinical course associated with dense deposits in the kidney basement membranes. Kidney Int. 1972;1:420–427. doi: 10.1038/ki.1972.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Park S.J., Kim Y.J., Ha T.S., Lim B.J., Jeong H.J., Park Y.H. Dense deposit disease in Korean children: a multicenter clinicopathologic study. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27:1215–1221. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.10.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lu D.F., Moon M., Lanning L.D., McCarthy A.M., Smith R.J. Clinical features and outcomes of 98 children and adults with dense deposit disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:773–781. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-2059-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Habib R., Gubler M.C., Loirat C., Maïz H.B., Levy M. Dense deposit disease: a variant of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 1975;7:204–215. doi: 10.1038/ki.1975.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vargas R., Thomson K.J., Wilson D., Cameron J.S., Turner D.R., Gill D. Mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis with dense "deposits" in the basement membranes of the kidney. Clin Nephrol. 1976;5:73–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Davis A.E., Schneeberger E.E., Grupe W.E., McCluskey R.T. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN type I) and dense deposit disease (DDD) in children. Clin Nephrol. 1978;9:184–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kashtan C.E., Burke B., Burch G., Gustav Fisker S., Kim Y. Dense intramembranous deposit disease: a clinical comparison of histological subtypes. Clin Nephrol. 1990;33:1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sethi S., Fervenza F.C., Zhang Y., Zand L., Vrana J.A., Nasr S.H. C3 glomerulonephritis: clinicopathological findings, complement abnormalities, glomerular proteomic profile, treatment, and follow-up. Kidney Int. 2012;82:465–473. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Berger J., Hinglais N. Les dépôts intercapillaires d'IgA-IgG. J Urol Nephrol (Paris) 1968;74:694–695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Levy M., Halbwachs-Mecarelli L., Gubler M.C., Kohout G., Bensenouci A., Niaudet P. H deficiency in two brothers with atypical dense intramembranous deposit disease. Kidney Int. 1986;30:949–956. doi: 10.1038/ki.1986.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lamb V., Tisher C.C., McCoy R.C., Robinson R.R. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with dense intramembranous alterations. A clinicopathologic study. Lab Invest. 1977;36:607–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jenis E.H., Sandler P., Hill G.S., Knieser M.R., Jensen G.E., Roskes S.D. Glomerulonephritis with basement membrane dense deposits. Arch Pathol. 1974;97:84–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Duvall-Young J., MacDonald M.K., McKechnie N.M. Fundus changes in (type II) mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis simulating drusen: a histopathological report. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73:297–302. doi: 10.1136/bjo.73.4.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mullins R.F., Aptsiauri N., Hageman G.S. Structure and composition of drusen associated with glomerulonephritis: implications for the role of complement activation in drusen biogenesis. Eye (Lond) 2001;15:390–395. doi: 10.1038/eye.2001.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Appel G.B., Cook H.T., Hageman G., Jennette J.C., Kashgarian M., Kirschfink M. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (dense deposit disease): an update. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:1392–1403. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005010078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bomback A.S., Smith R.J., Barile G.R., Zhang Y., Heher E.C., Herlitz L. Eculizumab for dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulonephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:748–756. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12901211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gellis S., Green S., Walker D. Chronic renal disease in children. Am J Dis Child. 1958;96:605–611. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Eisinger A.J., Shortland J.R., Moorhead P.J. Renal disease in partial lipodystrophy. QJM. 1972;41:343–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Williams D.G., Scopes J.W., Peters D.K. Hypocomplementaemic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and nephrotic syndrome associated with partial lipodystrophy of the face and trunk. Proc R Soc Med. 1972;65:591. doi: 10.1177/003591577206500708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nasr S.H., Satoskar A., Markowitz G.S., Valeri A.M., Appel G.B., Stokes M.B. Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:2055–2064. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009010110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sissons J.G., West R.J., Fallows J., Williams D.G., Boucher B.J., Amos N. The complement abnormalities of lipodystrophy. N Engl J Med. 1976;294:461–465. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197602262940902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hamza M., Levy M., Broyer M., Habib R. Deux cas de glomérulo-néphrite membrano-proliférative avec lipodystrophie partielle de type facio-tronculaire. J Urol Néphrol (Paris) 1970;76:1032–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Misra A., Peethambaram A., Garg A. Clinical features and metabolic and autoimmune derangements in acquired partial lipodystrophy: report of 35 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004;83:18–34. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000111061.69212.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sepandj F., Trillo A. Dense deposit disease in association with monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11:2309–2312. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sethi S., Sukov W.R., Zhang Y., Fervenza F.C., Lager D.J., Miller D.V. Dense deposit disease associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:977–982. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zand L., Kattah A., Fervenza F.C., Smith R.J., Nasr S.H., Zhang Y. C3 glomerulonephritis associated with monoclonal gammopathy: a case series. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62:506–514. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schwertz R., de Jong R., Gretz N., Kirschfink M., Anders D., Schärer K. Outcome of idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in children. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Padiatrische Nephrologie. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85:308–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Smith R.J., Alexander J., Barlow P.N., Botto M., Cassavant T.L., Cook H.T. New approaches to the treatment of dense deposit disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2447–2456. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007030356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cansick J.C., Lennon R., Cummins C.L., Howie A.J., McGraw M.E., Saleem M.A. Prognosis, treatment and outcome of childhood mesangiocapillary (membranoproliferative) glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:2769–2777. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.di Belgiojoso B., Tarantino A., Colasanti G., Bazzi C., Guerra L., Durante A. The prognostic value of some clinical and histological parameters in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN): report of 112 cases. Nephron. 1977;19:250–258. doi: 10.1159/000180897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Somers M., Kertesz S., Rosen S., Herrin J., Colvin R., Palacios de Carreta N. Non-nephrotic children with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: are steroids indicated? Pediatr Nephrol. 1995;9:140–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00860727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Miller M.N., Baumal R., Poucell S., Steele B.T. Incidence and prognostic importance of glomerular crescents in renal diseases of childhood. Am J Nephrol. 1984;4:244–247. doi: 10.1159/000166817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Spitzer R.E., Vallota E.H., Forristal J., Sudora E., Stitzel A., Davis N.C. Serum C'3 lytic system in patients with glomerulonephritis. Science. 1969;164:436–437. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3878.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Daha M.R., Fearon D.T., Austen K.F. C3 nephritic factor (C3NeF): stabilization of fluid phase and cell-bound alternative pathway convertase. J Immunol. 1976;116:1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mollnes T.E., Ng Y.C., Peters D.K., Lea T., Tschopp J., Harboe M. Effect of nephritic factor on C3 and on the terminal pathway of complement in vivo and in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol. 1986;65:73–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Clardy C.W., Forristal J., Strife C.F., West C.D. A properdin dependent nephritic factor slowly activating C3, C5, and C9 in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, types I and III. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1989;50:333–347. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(89)90141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tanuma Y., Ohi H., Hatano M. Two types of C3 nephritic factor: properdin-dependent C3NeF and properdin-independent C3NeF. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1990;56:226–238. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(90)90144-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schwertz R., Rother U., Anders D., Gretz N., Schärer K., Kirschfink M. Complement analysis in children with idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: a long-term follow-up. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2001;12:166–172. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2001.012003166.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zhang Y., Meyer N.C., Wang K., Nishimura C., Frees K., Jones M. Causes of alternative pathway dysregulation in dense deposit disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:265–274. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07900811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gale D.P., Goicoechea de Jorge E., Cook H.T., Martínez-Barricarte R., Hadjisavvas A., McLean A.G. Identification of a mutation in complement factor H-related protein 5 in patients of Cypriot origin with glomerulonephritis. Lancet. 2010;376:794–801. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60670-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Strobel S., Zimmering M., Papp K., Prechl J., Józsi M. Anti-factor B autoantibody in dense deposit disease. Mol Immunol. 2010;47:1476–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chen Q., Müller D., Rudolph B., Hartmann A., Kuwertz-Bröking E., Wu K. Combined C3b and factor B autoantibodies and MPGN type II. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2340–2342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1107484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Meri S., Koistinen V., Miettinen A., Törnroth T., Seppälä I.J. Activation of the alternative pathway of complement by monoclonal lambda light chains in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. J Exp Med. 1992;175:939–950. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.4.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jokiranta T.S., Solomon A., Pangburn M.K., Zipfel P.F., Meri S. Nephritogenic lambda light chain dimer: a unique human miniautoantibody against complement factor H. J Immunol. 1999;163:4590–4596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Goodship T.H., Pappworth I.Y., Toth T., Denton M., Houlberg K., McCormick F. Factor H autoantibodies in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Mol Immunol. 2012;52:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Dragon-Durey M.A., Frémeaux-Bacchi V., Loirat C., Blouin J., Niaudet P., Deschenes G. Heterozygous and homozygous factor h deficiencies associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: report and genetic analysis of 16 cases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:787–795. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000115702.28859.a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rusai K., Zaller V., Szilagyi A., Kain R., Prohaszka Z., Cook H.T. A rare case: childhood-onset C3 glomerulonephritis due to homozygous factor H deficiency. Clin Exp Nephrol Case Rep. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s13730-013-0070-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Vogt B.A., Wyatt R.J., Burke B.A., Simonton S.C., Kashtan C.E. Inherited factor H deficiency and collagen type III glomerulopathy. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995;9:11–15. doi: 10.1007/BF00858956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ault B.H., Schmidt B.Z., Fowler N.L., Kashtan C.E., Ahmed A.E., Vogt B.A. Human factor H deficiency. Mutations in framework cysteine residues and block in H protein secretion and intracellular catabolism. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:25168–25175. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.40.25168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Schmidt B.Z., Fowler N.L., Hidvegi T., Perlmutter D.H., Colten H.R. Disruption of disulfide bonds is responsible for impaired secretion in human complement factor H deficiency. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:11782–11788. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.17.11782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Schejbel L., Schmidt I.M., Kirchhoff M., Andersen C.B., Marquart H.V., Zipfel P. Complement factor H deficiency and endocapillary glomerulonephritis due to paternal isodisomy and a novel factor H mutation. Genes Immun. 2011;12:90–99. doi: 10.1038/gene.2010.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wilson V., Darlay R., Wong W., Wood K.M., McFarlane J., Schejbel L. Genotype/phenotype correlations in complement factor h deficiency arising from uniparental isodisomy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.05.020. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Licht C., Heinen S., Józsi M., Loschmann I., Saunders R.E., Perkins S.J. Deletion of Lys224 in regulatory domain 4 of Factor H reveals a novel pathomechanism for dense deposit disease (MPGN II) Kidney Int. 2006;70:42–50. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Habbig S., Mihatsch M.J., Heinen S., Beck B., Emmel M., Skerka C. C3 deposition glomerulopathy due to a functional factor H defect. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1230–1234. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Martínez-Barricarte R., Heurich M., Valdes-Cañedo F., Vazquez-Martul E., Torreira E., Montes T. Human C3 mutation reveals a mechanism of dense deposit disease pathogenesis and provides insights into complement activation and regulation. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3702–3712. doi: 10.1172/JCI43343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Athanasiou Y., Voskarides K., Gale D.P., Damianou L., Patsias C., Zavros M. Familial C3 glomerulopathy associated with CFHR5 mutations: clinical characteristics of 91 patients in 16 pedigrees. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:1436–1446. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09541010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Neary J., Dorman A., Campbell E., Keogan M., Conlon P. Familial membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:E1. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.33932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Neary J.J., Conlon P.J., Croke D., Dorman A., Keogan M., Zhang F.Y. Linkage of a gene causing familial membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III to chromosome 1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:2052–2057. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000022006.49966.f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Malik T.H., Lavin P.J., Goicoechea de Jorge E., Vernon K.A., Rose K.L., Patel M.P. A hybrid CFHR3-1 gene causes familial C3 glomerulopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1155–1160. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012020166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Berry P.L., McEnery P.T., McAdams A.J., West C.D. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in two sibships. Clin Nephrol. 1981;16:101–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Marder H.K., Coleman T.H., Forristal J., Beischel L., West C.D. An inherited defect in the C3 convertase, C3b, Bb, associated with glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 1983;23:749–758. doi: 10.1038/ki.1983.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Linshaw M.A., Stapleton F.B., Cuppage F.E., Forristal J., West C.D., Schreiber R.D. Hypocomplementemic glomerulonephritis in an infant and mother. Evidence for an abnormal form of C3. Am J Nephrol. 1987;7:470–477. doi: 10.1159/000167525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lopez-Larrea C., Dieguez M., Enguix A., Dominguez O., Marín B., Gomez E. A familial deficiency of complement factor H. Biochem Soc Trans. 1987;15:648–649. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Herrin J.T., Bartsocas C.S. Familial membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 2 (MPGN-2) Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;305:161–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Power D.A., Ng Y.C., Simpson J.G. Familial incidence of C3 nephritic factor, partial lipodystrophy and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. QJM. 1990;75:387–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.López-Trascasa M., Martín-Villa J.M., Vicario J.L., Marín M.A., Martínez-Ara J., García-Messeguer M.C. Familial incidence of C3 nephritic factor. Nephron. 1991;59:261–265. doi: 10.1159/000186562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Motoyama O., Sakai K., Ohashi Y., Mizuiri S., Hatori T., Iitaka K. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in a girl and her mother. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2009;13:77–80. doi: 10.1007/s10157-008-0070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Hageman G.S., Hancox L.S., Taiber A.J., Gehrs K.M., Anderson D.H., Johnson L.V. Extended haplotypes in the complement factor H (CFH) and CFH-related (CFHR) family of genes protect against age-related macular degeneration: characterization, ethnic distribution and evolutionary implications. Ann Med. 2006;38:592–604. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Goicoechea de Jorge E., Caesar J.J., Malik T.H., Patel M., Colledge M., Johnson S. Dimerization of complement factor H-related proteins modulates complement activation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:4685–4690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219260110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hughes A.E., Orr N., Esfandiary H., Diaz-Torres M., Goodship T., Chakravarthy U. A common CFH haplotype, with deletion of CFHR1 and CFHR3, is associated with lower risk of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1173–1177. doi: 10.1038/ng1890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Gharavi A.G., Kiryluk K., Choi M., Li Y., Hou P., Xie J. Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for IgA nephropathy. Nat Genet. 2011;43:321–327. doi: 10.1038/ng.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Servais A., Noël L.H., Dragon-Durey M.A., Gubler M.C., Remy P., Buob D. Heterogeneous pattern of renal disease associated with homozygous factor H deficiency. Hum Pathol. 2011;42:1305–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Vaziri-Sani F., Holmberg L., Sjoholm A.G., Kristoffersson A.C., Manea M., Frémeaux-Bacchi V. Phenotypic expression of factor H mutations in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2006;69:981–988. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Alper C.A., Abramson N., Johnston R.B., Jr, Jandl J.H., Rosen F.S. Increased susceptibility to infection associated with abnormalities of complement-mediated functions and of the third component of complement (C3) N Engl J Med. 1970;282:350–354. doi: 10.1056/nejm197002122820701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Abrera-Abeleda M.A., Nishimura C., Frees K., Jones M., Maga T., Katz L.M. Allelic variants of complement genes associated with dense deposit disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1551–1559. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010080795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Pickering M.C., Goicoechea de Jorge E., Martínez-Barricarte R., Recalde S., Garcia-Layana A., Rose K.L. Spontaneous hemolytic uremic syndrome triggered by complement factor H lacking surface recognition domains. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1249–1256. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Heurich M., Martínez-Barricarte R., Francis N.J., Roberts D.L., Rodríguez de Córdoba S., Morgan B.P. Common polymorphisms in C3, factor B, and factor H collaborate to determine systemic complement activity and disease risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:8761–8766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019338108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hageman G.S., Anderson D.H., Johnson L.V., Hancox L.S., Taiber A.J., Hardisty L.I. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:7227–7232. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501536102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Clark S.J., Ridge L.A., Herbert A.P., Hakobyan S., Mulloy B., Lennon R. Tissue-specific host recognition by complement factor H is mediated by differential activities of its glycosaminoglycan-binding regions. J Immunol. 2013;190:2049–2057. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Montes T., Goicoechea de Jorge E., Ramos R., Gomà M., Pujol O., Sánchez-Corral P. Genetic deficiency of complement factor H in a patient with age-related macular degeneration and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Mol Immunol. 2008;45:2897–2904. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hegasy G.A., Manuelian T., Høgåsen K., Jansen J.H., Zipfel P.F. The molecular basis for hereditary porcine membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II: point mutations in the factor H coding sequence block protein secretion. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:2027–2034. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64481-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Pickering M.C., Cook H.T., Warren J., Bygrave A.E., Moss J., Walport M.J. Uncontrolled C3 activation causes membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in mice deficient in complement factor H. Nat Genet. 2002;31:424–428. doi: 10.1038/ng912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Pickering M.C., Warren J., Rose K.L., Carlucci F., Wang Y., Walport M.J. Prevention of C5 activation ameliorates spontaneous and experimental glomerulonephritis in factor H-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:9649–9654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601094103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Rose K.L., Paixão-Cavalcante D., Fish J., Manderson A.P., Malik T.H., Bygrave A.E. Factor I is required for the development of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in factor H-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:608–618. doi: 10.1172/JCI32525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Paixão-Cavalcante D., Hanson S., Botto M., Cook H.T., Pickering M.C. Factor H facilitates the clearance of GBM bound iC3b by controlling C3 activation in fluid phase. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:1942–1950. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.03.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Fakhouri F., Goicoechea de Jorge E., Brune F., Azam P., Cook H.T., Pickering M.C. Treatment with human complement factor H rapidly reverses renal complement deposition in factor H-deficient mice. Kidney Int. 2010;78:279–286. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jansen J.H., Høgåsen K., Harboe M., Hovig T. In situ complement activation in porcine membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II. Kidney Int. 1998;53:331–349. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00765.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Vyse T.J., Spath P.J., Davies K.A., Morley B.J., Philippe P., Athanassiou P. Hereditary complement factor I deficiency. QJM. 1994;87:385–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ruseva M.M., Vernon K.A., Lesher A.M., Schwaeble W.J., Ali Y.M., Botto M. Loss of properdin exacerbates c3 glomerulopathy resulting from factor h deficiency. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:43–52. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012060571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Lesher A.M., Zhou L., Kimura Y., Sato S., Gullipalli D., Herbert A.P. Combination of factor H mutation and properdin deficiency causes severe C3 glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:53–65. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012060570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Goicoechea de Jorge E., Macor O., Paixão-Cavalcante D., Rose K.L., Tedesco F., Cook H.T. The development of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome depends on complement C5. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:137–145. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010050451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerulonephritis Work Group KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis. General principles in the management of glomerular disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:156–162. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.McEnery P.T., McAdams A.J. Regression of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (dense deposit disease): observations in six children. Am J Kidney Dis. 1988;12:138–146. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(88)80009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Tarshish P., Bernstein J., Tobin J.N., Edelmann C.M., Jr. Treatment of mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis with alternate-day prednisone--a report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children. Pediatr Nephrol. 1992;6:123–130. doi: 10.1007/BF00866289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Marks S.D., Rees L. Spontaneous clinical improvement in dense deposit disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;14:322–324. doi: 10.1007/s004670050768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Ikeda M., Honda M., Hasegawa O. Another example of spontaneous improvement in a case of dense deposit disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2001;16:609–610. doi: 10.1007/s004670100594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.West C.D., McAdams A.J., Witte D.P. Acute non-proliferative glomerulitis: a cause of renal failure unique to children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;14:786–793. doi: 10.1007/pl00024626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Barbour T., Johnson S., Cohney S., Hughes P. Thrombotic microangiopathy and associated renal disorders. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:2673–2685. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Kurtz K.A., Schlueter A.J. Management of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II with plasmapheresis. J Clin Apher. 2002;17:135–137. doi: 10.1002/jca.10026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Daina E., Noris M., Remuzzi G. Eculizumab in a patient with dense-deposit disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1161–1163. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1112273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Vivarelli M., Pasini A., Emma F. Eculizumab for the treatment of dense-deposit disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1163–1165. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1111953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.McCaughan J.A., O'Rourke D.M., Courtney A.E. Recurrent dense deposit disease after renal transplantation: an emerging role for complementary therapies. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1046–1051. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03923.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Radhakrishnan S., Lunn A., Kirschfink M., Thorner P., Hebert D., Langlois V. Eculizumab and refractory membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1165–1166. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1106619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Herlitz L.C., Bomback A.S., Markowitz G.S., Stokes M.B., Smith R.N., Colvin R.B. Pathology after eculizumab in dense deposit disease and C3 GN. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1229–1237. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011121186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Galle P., Hinglais N., Crosnier J. Recurrence of an original glomerular lesion in three renal allografts. Transplant Proc. 1971;3:368–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Andresdottir M.B., Assmann K.J., Hoitsma A.J., Koene R.A., Wetzels J.F. Renal transplantation in patients with dense deposit disease: morphological characteristics of recurrent disease and clinical outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:1723–1731. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.7.1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Hamburger J., Crosnier J., Noël L.H. Recurrent glomerulonephritis after renal transplantation. Annu Rev Med. 1978;29:67–72. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.29.020178.000435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Vernon K.A., Gale D.P., Goicoechea de Jorge E., McLean A.G., Galliford J., Pierides A. Recurrence of complement factor H-related protein 5 nephropathy in a renal transplant. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:152–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03333.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




