I Fashion My Future on Films in Space

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
mariacallous
mariacallous

You have Uyghur gushing over Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson and Hasan gushing over Hitler’s leadership of the Socialist Party. Holy shit.  Democrats: Stay FAR away from these two. Far away. https://t.co/l4Bdv96I5N  — FactsLivesMatter 🟤 (@Facts0601) November 29, 2025ALT
vermiciousyidreborn

Remember when the left was all about saying that liberals would ally with fascists against them, when it turns out that, thanks to antisemitism, they're allying with fascists against everyone?

I think these two should work with Musk (who they probably love now) and be on the first mission to mars.

a-s-fischer

And that whole "the liberals always ally with the fascists!" thing? Straight up Soviet propaganda. See the thing about the ideologies derived from Marx's writings is that Marx had a deterministic and very simplified view of history that allowed him to make predictions about how the future would play out. And the ideologies based on his writings, take his analysis of history and his predictions as truth, and see the truth of his views, and their own ideology, as confirmed or refuted by those prediction's coming true or failing to. but actually, when his predictions don't come to pass, because he did not actually have a crystal ball, instead of really seeing their ideologies as refuted, they come up with reasons why the prediction was right, and the works just got gummed up for some reason.

And one of those times was that according to the Soviet reading of Marx, the Weinmar Republic was supposed to have a glorious Communist revolution at exactly the moment it instead fell to the Nazis.

So Soviet academics after World War II came up with the justification that the German liberals used fascism to stop the revolution and therefore betrayed the revolution, and underneath their fake liberalism, they're really just fascists, and all they really care about is capitalistic greed and keeping the proletariat down. This had the lovely side effect of being very useful to paint the US led Cold War "free world" as all secretly fascist and just like Hitler.

The tragic irony is that the exact opposite happened from what the Soviet academics claimed. In the years leading up to the rise of the Nazis, the Marxist political associations had splintered into two groups, a liberal wing that was pro-democracy and sought electoral success in the new Weinmar government, and a wing that was still holding out for a glorious Communist revolution that would sweep all aside, and leave them in power. This split was deeply acrimonious, and the more radical wing especially saw the pro-liberal democracy wing as traitors and sellouts. They felt even angrier when that pro-liberal democracy wing actually did achieve quite a bit of electoral success. The revolutionary wing did not achieve electoral success, but they did have street gangs and a sense of grievance and moral purity, so who were the real winners?

But then came the depression and the resurgent Right, and a rise in street violence, and the pro-democracy faction found themselves alone, trying to hold the state together. And when pro-democracy politicians reached out to the Communists, the Communists laughed at them and refused to help. They didn't care about democracy, or preserving it, and these right wing movements, especially the Nazis, looked a lot like the proletarian revolution they were waiting for. So almost all of the communists either stood back or outright allied themselves with the Nazis, and even joined the party, in the hopes that they would guide this revolutionary movement into being the proper Communist revolution they were certain it would become.

And then once Hitler was firmly in power, he purged them from the ranks and had them arrested and/or killed, along with the liberals who tried to warn them.

And it's happening again. The same people who kept insisting that "scratch a liberal, find a fascist," and "the liberals always side with the fascists to betray the revolution", are cheerfully sitting back as the liberals try to hold a democratic government together, and falling all over themselves to welcome our new fascist overlords.

l3gendarycatlover

Reminder that ocasio-cortez and bernie sanders, the faces of the "progressive left" movement, launched their last speech tour (March 2025) with an interview with piker up there. He was their very first pick to speak to.

Apparently all it takes for a neonazi to pass as a leftist these days is to say he also hates Jews, cough, sorry, Zionists. Then the leftists welcome him with open arms and throw away any and all principles they claimed to stand for.

prince-atom

Just now saw a post on here that was talking about how liberalism and fascism are two ends of a spectrum and only differed in how overtly the state employed its violence to oppress dissidents. And buddy. If you think Marxist states refrain from using state violence to oppress dissidents. Then you maybe aren’t all that bright.

mariacallous

maswartz asked:

Dems should retake the Senate, deny Trump any SCOTUS vacancy à la Garland, win big in 2028, and expand the Court immediately in 2029 👀 https://t.co/qWaCVJ22uE  — Jessiah (@thepondering_) January 17, 2026ALT

afurioushawk answered:

You’ll need 60 votes to expand the court, unless you go for the nuclear option, so let’s keep that in mind before people set the Democrats up to fail again.

zaprowsdower27

Court expansion is one of the few things I could see getting the nuclear option, both because its so core to getting any other legislation actually through and because its so close in purpose to the last use of the nuclear option (for court appointments)

Also, because for practical reasons we've actually needed at least four more justices purely for practical reasons for quite some time because for decades if not centuries some Supreme Court justices have had to cover multiple Circuit courts instead of one justice per circuit the way there was in the beginning, meaning there's a non-partisan justification for it being necessary that can be used to persuade fence-sitting Democrats


Still not holding my breath, but I could actually see it happening outside of fever dreams.

pagecommando

Oh man. Every fucking time with this shit.
I call it the "Don't Siege Lenningrad, take it immediately" Phenomenon, after that infamous tweet where monday morning quarterback pundits and people like the below dipshit think war and politics are just HOI4 or some Green Lantern-ass shit where RAW WILLPOWER Gets you able to do things when you WIN and surely you will then WIN FOREVER if your HEART is PURE and your LEBEN is SRAUMING or whatever.

image

And of course Dems have both the SOLE expectation they can/must/will 'Just Do The Thing' AND having to swim upstream into raw sewage while the press, lefties, and basically every single pundit is forming a human raft and paddling just as hard as they can while Trump and the GOP stand on their backs and complain about the smell as they obliterate more norms and everyone blames the Dems for not stopping them with a West Wing Style Speech while they pretend they hated the show as younger people.

melaschasma

Look, not to take away from any other points being made here, but the very first point in the tweet is ridiculous. The Dowding system alone put the RAF so far beyond the Luftwaffe organisationally it’s almost laughable, not to mention that at no stage did the Nazis have any idea what they were actually dealing with: they had no clue about British production and maintenance capacity, no idea how many planes could be fielded or how quickly they could be replaced, and they did hit RAF facilities repeatedly for months, only for those same facilities to be back in operation hours or, at most, days later.

It goes against British self-mythology but it was never even close: at every point, in every way, the RAF was just better than the Luftwaffe.

pagecommando

IMU to give proper credit... The Luftwaffe was coming in with tested gear and some veteran pilots, (With less clear operational goals thanks to Der Dicke) while ceding home field advantage and lack of fighter cover to the brits due to range. Add to that their Radar systems and intercept plans (Truly revolutionary and not to be overlooked) with the further wrinkle that any plane the Nazis lost over the channel or the UK, even if the aircrew got out, wasn't able to come back at a critical time. (Contrast Allied aircrew having a shot at escaping Occupied France/Europe, say) Attacking British bases and air industry was something the Germans were already DOING, they just didn't have sufficient tonnage TO do it.

More importantly, can we both agree that Leigh-Mallory should have been fired in to the Channel before he got his Big Idea for the Big Wing?
(And, with Douglas, getting a shitload of Battle of Britain vets killed doing "Rhubarb" attacks into France shortly after)

prince-atom

Guy can’t even spell “Zerg.”

It was my understanding that the London Blitz started after the RAF accidentally bombed Berlin when they were trying to get a military target, so Hitler declared vengeance and told the Luftwaffe to target London.

As for “allying with the slavs [sic]” the Waffen-SS let its standards slip SUPER early, so I wouldn’t be surprised if there were some Eastern Europeans in their ranks, but on the whole, no.

And anyhow … WE WANT THE FASCISTS TO WIN WORLD WAR TWO, DO WE. WHAT DOES THAT MAKE US.

lyricwritesprose
lyricwritesprose

This is how the mythology do

So last night, in an attempt to stave off bedtime, my almost-thirteen son asked me, "Who would win in a running race between Hermes and Loki?"

My initial, knee-jerk answer was to say Hermes, it's one of his whole things. And then I thought about it.

"Kiddo," I said, "I have an answer, but you won't like it." (Kiddo is rather down on "romance" and things adjacent, he is twelve after all.)

"Tell me anyway," says he.

"Okay. Well. The first thing that Loki does is to transform into an unrealistically attractive woman. Think Jessica Rabbit, except not a toon. She drags Hermes into the bushes (not that he has the slightest problem with this) and we fade to black. A loooong time later, while Hermes is tired and sleeping, Loki staggers across the finish line. Problem is, she's pregnant, and the baby is gonna be involved in the apocalypse somehow, because that is how the Loki do."

And my son is like, "…you know what, fair. That is indeed how the Loki do."

And I find this fascinating, because I think this may be how mythology works in the first place. Someone brings up an idea, someone spins a tale around it, and if it works, if it fits into the nebulous bounds of "What We Know About This," it might get passed on. We do this every day on Tumblr. We have this impression of Batman as, "Reacts to suicidally brave and angry teens with, 'Okay, Dad now,'" so when someone says, "How would Batman react to Spider-man," the answer is, "Are you kidding, Batman is prepared for every situation, he already has the adoption papers on him." New myth created, in accordance with what we "know."

And also I think that if I could somehow ask a Viking about it, once we got past various details like, "I am not touching that 'computer,' you said it runs on sums and that's women's magic," and, "I do not have enough fucking mead for this," he would be like, "No, yeah, that's legit, that is indeed How The Loki Do."

madmaudlingoes
sprinkledsalt

Hot take: the following things can be simultaneously true:

  • America has always done bad things
  • Trumpism is connected to the failures of Reconstruction
  • Trump is still a uniquely terrible figure who ushered in a uniquely destructive era in American politics
  • Snide remarks like “lulz, lmao, you think Trump is bad? America was ALWAYS bad” contributed to the cynicism, nihilism, and apathy which led to not enough people caring about the country to try to stop him at the ballot box

It reminds me of people being outraged when Democrats responded to something like Charlottesville with “this isn’t who we are”; yeah, obviously that’s always been part of America, but rhetoric has an impact and it both empowers white supremacists and demoralizes normies to say “yep, white supremacists represent America and everything has always sucked shit.” There are consequences to pretending all people and eras are equally bad, because then people stop taking new and dire threats seriously, and there are consequences to people believing their society is always and forever evil, because then they don't fight against those threatening to harm that society. You don't need to whitewash history to understand any of this.

sprinkledsalt

@cardassiangoodreads The idea that America has always been all of these things also is a thing that seems to be lost to the nihilists too. There's been resistance to racism in America as long as there has been racism. That resistance is every bit as much "who we are." (I also think the "who we are" comment is making a more specific statement that these people don't understand. Like when your country is founded on democratic ideals, even if it's long been imperfect at implementing those, it's fair to use that to talk about how the people claiming to "uphold" that are actually in conflict with those ideals! It's fair to say that fully living up to those ideals means creating something better than what has historically been given to us.)

I muted this post right after I made it and still haven't looked into the notes (lol) so I only just saw your reply now, but yes! There have been Americans fighting against racism as long as there have been Americans! The abolitionist movement and Civil Rights Movement are key components to this country's history. Fighting against oppression? That's part of America, too, and it's a disservice to everyone from previous generations who fought for civil rights to say otherwise. The history of America has been a constant struggle to achieve that more perfect union.

And yeah, just on a basic level, people who get really mad at "this isn't who we are" are just missing the point. America is an idea, an idea of a nation that values equality with "liberty and justice for all", etc., etc., and like you said, it's legitimate to point out when politicians are acting in direct opposition to those founding principles. When people say that hatred is un-American, they're not necessarily ignoring America's hate-filled past, but saying hatred is antithetical to the founding principles that the country should be living up to. Like, idk, I never had a hard time understanding this lol, but people do, and as I mentioned in the original post, they seem to either be unaware or unconcerned with the fact that "hatred isn't who we are" is just much more appealing rhetoric to the average person than "everything has always sucked shit and nothing will get better and America must burn in a holy fire--"

prince-atom

Hey, turns out, if you treat everything positive that anybody might say about the United States as propaganda from the imperial core, then the only things you tend to believe about the Untied Snakes is the violent shit we’ve done, potentially distorted by propaganda from other countries.

And then their whole plan to solve everything is to burn everything down and survive in the ashes as a network of Rugged Mutual Aid Networks of balcony container gardens and bathroom insulin stills, apparently based on the notion that if this pill you’re charged an arm and a leg for costs pennies to produce, that means it can be cooked up in the bathroom sink.

uristmcdorf
1111um
cyberiada

you can INCREASE your PLAYTIME by being a BAD GAMER

prince-atom

I found a guy on YouTube with a series of videos about “I FORCED myself to play these super old games!” like … Oblivion and Fallout 3.

He complained about getting lost in the DC Metro system “forever … about ten minutes” and I was like, my dude, do you realize that containers … hold things? Do you poke? Do you peer? Do you pry? I can spend waaaaay more than ten minutes in the DC Metro and by the end of it I have hundreds of caps, dozens of bullets and all the bent tin cans I can carry!

Also maybe play something from the 90s if you’re wanting “super old” ?

mariacallous
worfsbarmitzvah

i used to buy into that online leftist black-and-white Glorious Revolution stuff and what i remember about my mindset at that time. stresses me out tbh. i couldn't see the viability of anything short of full-scale revolution so i constantly felt helpless. i viewed the revolution as necessary to address any and all societal problems, but i was also, privately, terrified of it. i didn't want to die for the cause, but i told myself that if that was what happened when the revolution came it would be worth it, that my blood could move us that much faster toward perfect socialist utopia.

in this mindset, the only useful thing i could do was die. i didn't want to. i wasn't generally suicidal (although i do consider this mindset a form of... abstract suicidal thought). but i believed my life was the only meaningful thing i had to offer.

now i'm a member of a community who values me and values my contributions even if i can't contribute as much as i'd like -- a community that emphasizes that every single good deed matters, every compassionate act changes the world. a community where just showing up is enough.

now i know that i can change so much more while i'm alive than i'd ever be able to as a corpse on a battlefield. i know that if i keep showing up, i will find or someone will show me a way to make a difference. i know that i am valued as more than a hypothetical martyr in some grand final battle. i know that i am missed when i'm gone. i know that the actual work is done by regular people with a goal in mind, and i know that that work is unglamorous. i know the unglamorous work is often the most meaningful and the most fulfilling.

the "revolution or nothing" mindset is rendering my generation hopeless. a very loud portion of gen z now believes the only contribution they have to offer is their life. this belief effectively nullifies a person's capacity to create meaningful change; any action they could take while alive is not worthwhile because it won't fix the world's myriad problems in one fell swoop -- better to burn it all down and yourself with it.

if they weren't actively fucking over the rest of us to feed their own suicidal hopelessness, i'd feel sorry for them.

worfsbarmitzvah

there's a phenomenon i've observed wherein a person stews in their own misery, hopelessness, anger, fear, to the point that they can no longer fathom that something might exist outside of that, and so they reject any effort to improve their situation because they no longer believe it can be improved.

i am not blaming the people who are in this place. it's a terrifying, dark place to be in, and when you're there it really does feel like it's the only thing that exists. this is the place where people kill themselves.

i think, though, that this phenomenon, scaled up to apply to politics and activism, undergirds so much of what we see from the left now -- the world is dark and terrifying, and in the 24-hour news cycle, social media doomscrolling era we live in it's so so easy to only see the bad, and when you surround yourself with other scared, overwhelmed people, it can form a sort of 2014-tumblr-depression-tag echo chamber where that hopelessness is glorified and lauded and propped up as Correct And Enlightened.

and then they commit hate crimes about it and my sympathy shuts all the way off.

megpie71

Boosting signal