Don't question it

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

The vilification of Itachi

I don’t usually scroll into the naruto fandom, but i rewatched the entire series this week and i felt like looking at what other people were saying. I was going through the anti-hiruzen hashtag ( because that man deserves the worst and was a horrible person ), when i realised something that was really surprising ( to me at least ). When people take a look at the decimation of the uchiha clan and all that led up to it, they rightfully blame Hiruzen and Tobirama, but also weirdly Itachi. Which is really surprising to me because i’d never seen itachi’s involvement in the massacre as anything but unwilling . Granted, this is a very small portion of the fandom, but it still stuck out to me. So i wanted to give my two cents on it. 

Keep reading

Pinned Post I'm saying this nicely but i'm actually so pissed rn why are people blaming the child in this situation out of everyone involved HE'S the one your blaming seriously? i cant believe this go blame Danzo or Hiruzen yk the actual ADULTS in this situation anti hiruzen anti danzo anti konoha screw that village itachi uchiha
cumulant
mieux-de-se-taire

F1/Motorsport Reading List

Here is a compilation of almost everything I've read about F1, mostly academic articles and essays. The categories aren't exact since there's a lot of overlap, and a few things are listed in multiple places. Starred items are those I personally found most interesting, dashed ones I'm somewhat dubious of. I've included links to excerpts that I've previously posted, and you can also check out my f1 scholarship tag. I've also listed some places where most of these readings can be found, but if anyone is having trouble finding or accessing anything, just message me and I can send them to you. I plan to keep updating this as I read more, and if you have any recommendations, please let me know!

Keep reading

Tag people you want to get to know better!

Tagged by the lovely @papayapastry81 , thank you for this!

Reading: The fifth season by J.K Jemison (please read it is so good)

Last series: Temptation Island (Does that count? Idk buts its been my slop show of the week, it is sooo entertaining)

Last movie: Sinners! Had a movie night with some friends yesterday

Last song: Virgo’s Groove by Beyonce ( my favourite song ever)

Sweet or salty: Sweet. I will be buried in chocolate one day.

Coffee or tea: I don’t really drink either? But probaly tea because I can’t stand the taste of coffee.

Working on: Reading and going out more!

No pressure tags, and sorry if you did this and I didnt see it: @lestapiastrisgirl , @cumulant, @unlapped , @fortyfourwdc , @team7-headquarter

I haven't been on tumblr for a minute but this is so cute! i missed this hellspace
cainrising

Anonymous asked:

Oscar has a high ceiling but it will only be as high as McLaren allows and right now it’s clear they are not willing to let it be higher than Norris, which I believe it can be.

Prev anon is failing to acknowledge the major reason Norris was able to have a resurgence after summer break is because he knew he had the team backing him. Whereas the major reason Oscar struggled so much after summer break is because he knew the team was not backing him.

They both drove well and both drove not so well at times but Norris won because he had the support to do so and as Oscar himself said you cannot win a championship on your own you need your team and he didn’t have that.

inhalingstardust000 answered:

no notes I agree 100%

cainrising

sorry to just. stick my nose in. just wanted to add:

"Prev anon is failing to acknowledge the major reason Norris was able to have a resurgence after summer break is because he knew he had the team backing him"

<- do u guys remember that interview after mexico where norris said he sat down with the team after singapore and told them they needed to develop the car his way

image

maybe im just the #nooticer idk. but it rubbed me the wrong way because the implication i got was mclaren switched from their neutral number 2 driver approach to something that favoured norris. also backed by comments from oscar and stella after austin/mexico about oscar having to "drive the car in a different way". (but then contradicted by oscar saying "the car hasn't changed since the beginning of the year" ?)

obsidianstrawberrymilk
obsidianstrawberrymilk

having a mother is crazy bc you will be like i understand why you did this and that you're not gonna change i'm just mad at you. let's move on. and she will be like No i'm going to spend an hour talking about why you suck and are dumb because i was perfectly justified. and you will be like okay can we move on. and she will be like No i'm gonna spend an hour-

genuinely drives me insane like Iets please move on omg now I’m just more irritated
buf309
phantomrose96

If anyone wants to know why every tech company in the world right now is clamoring for AI like drowned rats scrabbling to board a ship, I decided to make a post to explain what's happening.

(Disclaimer to start: I'm a software engineer who's been employed full time since 2018. I am not a historian nor an overconfident Youtube essayist, so this post is my working knowledge of what I see around me and the logical bridges between pieces.)

Okay anyway. The explanation starts further back than what's going on now. I'm gonna start with the year 2000. The Dot Com Bubble just spectacularly burst. The model of "we get the users first, we learn how to profit off them later" went out in a no-money-having bang (remember this, it will be relevant later). A lot of money was lost. A lot of people ended up out of a job. A lot of startup companies went under. Investors left with a sour taste in their mouth and, in general, investment in the internet stayed pretty cooled for that decade. This was, in my opinion, very good for the internet as it was an era not suffocating under the grip of mega-corporation oligarchs and was, instead, filled with Club Penguin and I Can Haz Cheezburger websites.

Then around the 2010-2012 years, a few things happened. Interest rates got low, and then lower. Facebook got huge. The iPhone took off. And suddenly there was a huge new potential market of internet users and phone-havers, and the cheap money was available to start backing new tech startup companies trying to hop on this opportunity. Companies like Uber, Netflix, and Amazon either started in this time, or hit their ramp-up in these years by shifting focus to the internet and apps.

Now, every start-up tech company dreaming of being the next big thing has one thing in common: they need to start off by getting themselves massively in debt. Because before you can turn a profit you need to first spend money on employees and spend money on equipment and spend money on data centers and spend money on advertising and spend money on scale and and and

But also, everyone wants to be on the ship for The Next Big Thing that takes off to the moon.

So there is a mutual interest between new tech companies, and venture capitalists who are willing to invest $$$ into said new tech companies. Because if the venture capitalists can identify a prize pig and get in early, that money could come back to them 100-fold or 1,000-fold. In fact it hardly matters if they invest in 10 or 20 total bust projects along the way to find that unicorn.

But also, becoming profitable takes time. And that might mean being in debt for a long long time before that rocket ship takes off to make everyone onboard a gazzilionaire.

But luckily, for tech startup bros and venture capitalists, being in debt in the 2010's was cheap, and it only got cheaper between 2010 and 2020. If people could secure loans for ~3% or 4% annual interest, well then a $100,000 loan only really costs $3,000 of interest a year to keep afloat. And if inflation is higher than that or at least similar, you're still beating the system.

So from 2010 through early 2022, times were good for tech companies. Startups could take off with massive growth, showing massive potential for something, and venture capitalists would throw infinite money at them in the hopes of pegging just one winner who will take off. And supporting the struggling investments or the long-haulers remained pretty cheap to keep funding.

You hear constantly about "Such and such app has 10-bazillion users gained over the last 10 years and has never once been profitable", yet the thing keeps chugging along because the investors backing it aren't stressed about the immediate future, and are still banking on that "eventually" when it learns how to really monetize its users and turn that profit.

The pandemic in 2020 took a magnifying-glass-in-the-sun effect to this, as EVERYTHING was forcibly turned online which pumped a ton of money and workers into tech investment. Simultaneously, money got really REALLY cheap, bottoming out with historic lows for interest rates.

Then the tide changed with the massive inflation that struck late 2021. Because this all-gas no-brakes state of things was also contributing to off-the-rails inflation (along with your standard-fare greedflation and price gouging, given the extremely convenient excuses of pandemic hardships and supply chain issues). The federal reserve whipped out interest rate hikes to try to curb this huge inflation, which is like a fire extinguisher dousing and suffocating your really-cool, actively-on-fire party where everyone else is burning but you're in the pool. And then they did this more, and then more. And the financial climate followed suit. And suddenly money was not cheap anymore, and new loans became expensive, because loans that used to compound at 2% a year are now compounding at 7 or 8% which, in the language of compounding, is a HUGE difference. A $100,000 loan at a 2% interest rate, if not repaid a single cent in 10 years, accrues to $121,899. A $100,000 loan at an 8% interest rate, if not repaid a single cent in 10 years, more than doubles to $215,892.

Now it is scary and risky to throw money at "could eventually be profitable" tech companies. Now investors are watching companies burn through their current funding and, when the companies come back asking for more, investors are tightening their coin purses instead. The bill is coming due. The free money is drying up and companies are under compounding pressure to produce a profit for their waiting investors who are now done waiting.

You get enshittification. You get quality going down and price going up. You get "now that you're a captive audience here, we're forcing ads or we're forcing subscriptions on you." Don't get me wrong, the plan was ALWAYS to monetize the users. It's just that it's come earlier than expected, with way more feet-to-the-fire than these companies were expecting. ESPECIALLY with Wall Street as the other factor in funding (public) companies, where Wall Street exhibits roughly the same temperament as a baby screaming crying upset that it's soiled its own diaper (maybe that's too mean a comparison to babies), and now companies are being put through the wringer for anything LESS than infinite growth that Wall Street demands of them.

Internal to the tech industry, you get MASSIVE wide-spread layoffs. You get an industry that used to be easy to land multiple job offers shriveling up and leaving recent graduates in a desperately awful situation where no company is hiring and the market is flooded with laid-off workers trying to get back on their feet.

Because those coin-purse-clutching investors DO love virtue-signaling efforts from companies that say "See! We're not being frivolous with your money! We only spend on the essentials." And this is true even for MASSIVE, PROFITABLE companies, because those companies' value is based on the Rich Person Feeling Graph (their stock) rather than the literal profit money. A company making a genuine gazillion dollars a year still tears through layoffs and freezes hiring and removes the free batteries from the printer room (totally not speaking from experience, surely) because the investors LOVE when you cut costs and take away employee perks. The "beer on tap, ping pong table in the common area" era of tech is drying up. And we're still unionless.

Never mind that last part.

And then in early 2023, AI (more specifically, Chat-GPT which is OpenAI's Large Language Model creation) tears its way into the tech scene with a meteor's amount of momentum. Here's Microsoft's prize pig, which it invested heavily in and is galivanting around the pig-show with, to the desperate jealousy and rapture of every other tech company and investor wishing it had that pig. And for the first time since the interest rate hikes, investors have dollar signs in their eyes, both venture capital and Wall Street alike. They're willing to restart the hose of money (even with the new risk) because this feels big enough for them to take the risk.

Now all these companies, who were in varying stages of sweating as their bill came due, or wringing their hands as their stock prices tanked, see a single glorious gold-plated rocket up out of here, the likes of which haven't been seen since the free money days. It's their ticket to buy time, and buy investors, and say "see THIS is what will wring money forth, finally, we promise, just let us show you."

To be clear, AI is NOT profitable yet. It's a money-sink. Perhaps a money-black-hole. But everyone in the space is so wowed by it that there is a wide-spread and powerful conviction that it will become profitable and earn its keep. (Let's be real, half of that profit "potential" is the promise of automating away jobs of pesky employees who peskily cost money.) It's a tech-space industrial revolution that will automate away skilled jobs, and getting in on the ground floor is the absolute best thing you can do to get your pie slice's worth.

It's the thing that will win investors back. It's the thing that will get the investment money coming in again (or, get it second-hand if the company can be the PROVIDER of something needed for AI, which other companies with venture-back will pay handsomely for). It's the thing companies are terrified of missing out on, lest it leave them utterly irrelevant in a future where not having AI-integration is like not having a mobile phone app for your company or not having a website.

So I guess to reiterate on my earlier point:

Drowned rats. Swimming to the one ship in sight.

jujuthewulfpup

As someone that is also a software enginerr snd graduated college in 2019, I find this summarized history compelling. I honestly never thought about interest rates being lower than inflation equating to free money for rich people. I understood it when trying to get a mortgage while interest rates were rising but it never occurred to me that rich people,investors, CEOs, CFOs probably think that way all the time.

Thanks for this.

amemait

A bezzle

eglantinewynne-baugh

Speaking as someone who holds a master’s degree in economics and was also paying attention to the news during the dot-com bust (yes I was eleven but I also lived in a house that got three newspapers a day and was located a mere 100 miles away from Silicon Valley), this summary is basically spot-on for the history of investment in the tech industry from 2000 through 2023.

However. It appears to have been written in 2024. And from our current vantage point in December of 2025, it is in fact *not* looking like the LLM technology we are currently calling AI is ever going to generate a profit (some forms of machine learning might, and probably already do, but they aren’t what either the public or the venture capitalists mean when they say AI). It does no new tasks, it does no tasks better than humans are already doing them, and (more to the point, sadly), it doesn’t appear to do any tasks barely adequately but more cheaply than humans do them either. Data centers are fucking expensive not only to build but to run (this matters; high start-up costs are surmountable, but high marginal costs—particularly high marginal energy costs subject to the whims of the global price of oil—are not) and AI needs a shit-ton of them. The copyright lawsuits about the works that the AI companies used as inputs in the first place are looking like they have the potential to be expensive enough to put the kibosh on LLMs as business models all on their own.

Unfortunately massive tech layoffs are still happening—not because AI is eliminating programmer’s jobs, but because it’s a fucking goddamn bubble. All we can do at this point is hope it bursts soon, because the longer bubbles go on the worse the fallout is.