theme made by espoirthemes

mournfulroses:

image

D. H. Lawrence, from a letter featured in The Selected Letters of D. H. Lawrence

misidentifying-animals-in-posts:

utatane-piko-official:

image

Sits on your dash

Rock 🪨 (medium size)

wheeloffortune-design:

“I still got time” is a filthy traitor who will back stab you.

ominous-signs:

xenthosss:

cloud–atlas:

actualdraccus:

unluckyxse7en:

moondane-lovers:

TO ANYONE WHO USES DISCORD- FOUR AI SCRAPING BOTS HAVE BEEN SECRETLY ADDED TO YOUR SERVERS WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT

Saw this going around and tested it myself, and I can confirm that this is unfortunately legit. Four hidden bots have been placed in any existing or newly created Discord server that are harvesting data, images, and most concerningly, one seems to be a face swap bot.

Due to them being invisible, banning them from your servers isn’t possible without their ID’s, which I’ve typed out for easy access.

1153984868804468756
1288638725869535283
1090660574196674713
1104973139257081909

Banning is done with the /ban command with each string pasted in one at a time. Four ban commands in total.

Image proof below and further information. This was in my PERSONAL server that has existed for +5 years. Discord is harvesting your shit without your consent, fight back.

image
image
image

Hey so in case you’re like me and wondered: Can you ban members without them being in the server?

The answer is yes, you absolutely can! It’ll look like this - the numbers you paste will be what’s “banned”

image

However my sibling tried this in her servers and found that One of them was NOT a string of numbers, like so:

image

And for clarity it isn’t a difference in user or device, this is what she got elsewhere:

image

So if you ban these numbers and the message shows the actual username? Pretty sure that means they were in there.

Very unpleasant way to check the veracity of this post but hopefully this is a helpful tip for anyone who was concerned - my sib would have No Reason to add these in herself and didn’t have any clue it was in there.

Personally, I’d say even if you are still worried about misinfo/fearmongering/etc from this post, think of it this way - worst case scenario is you’re banning a bot you’ll never use or need. Not a person, a bot. There’s no real damage done playing it safe and running the ban commands through, aside from maybe losing some time doing so.

Best of luck everyone.

Wishing I’d seen this more quickly - Had to take these things out of a lot of creative spaces just now. I’m not convinced that the username only shows up if they were in there, but I do think it’s better safe than sorry, especially when peoples’ art is involved.

@quidnunc-life @inkvoices @alistrawrites

@returnsnull7404 hey this is VERY much real I just took all of them off my discord

This worked on my end too (two servers, one of which only has ME ALONE as a member! Also worked for a friend who had a similar experience)

image
image

gwydionmisha:

longseasons:

image
image
image

Bonus: If I buy a book I get to keep it! The publisher can’t turn up at my house at random and confiscate all the books I bought.

sophsun1:

image
image

Now crossing the river at its most peaceful spot was an old wooden bridge. It was a familiar spot to Winnie the Pooh, for he would often wander there.

Winnie the Pooh and a Day for Eeyore ( 1983) dir. Rick Reinert

the-haiku-bot:

justgarb:

only-tiktoks:

I saw the skirt, got super excited, and was not disappointed

I saw the skirt, got

super excited, and was

not disappointed

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

crazy-pages:

socio-logic:

“If a society puts half its children into short skirts and warns them not to move in ways that reveal their panties, while putting the other half into jeans and overalls and encouraging them to climb trees, play ball, and participate in other vigorous outdoor games; if later, during adolescence, the children who have been wearing trousers are urged to “eat like growing boys,” while the children in skirts are warned to watch their weight and not get fat; if the half in jeans runs around in sneakers or boots, while the half in skirts totters about on spike heels, then these two groups of people will be biologically as well as socially different. Their muscles will be different, as will their reflexes, posture, arms, legs and feet, hand-eye coordination, and so on. Similarly, people who spend eight hours a day in an office working at a typewriter or a visual display terminal will be biologically different from those who work on construction jobs. There is no way to sort the biological and social components that produce these differences. We cannot sort nature from nurture when we confront group differences in societies in which people from different races, classes, and sexes do not have equal access to resources and power, and therefore live in different environments. Sex-typed generalizations, such as that men are heavier, taller, or stronger than women, obscure the diversity among women and among men and the extensive overlaps between them… Most women and men fall within the same range of heights, weights, and strengths, three variables that depend a great deal on how we have grown up and live. We all know that first-generation Americans, on average, are taller than their immigrant parents and that men who do physical labor, on average, are stronger than male college professors. But we forget to look for the obvious reasons for differences when confronted with assertions like ‘Men are stronger than women.’ We should be asking: ‘Which men?’ and ‘What do they do?’ There may be biologically based average differences between women and men, but these are interwoven with a host of social differences from which we cannot disentangle them.”

— Ruth Hubbard, “The Political Nature of ‘Human Nature’
(via gothhabiba)

Yes.

Here, have a study (x) showing that mothers underestimate their daughter’s physical capacity from as young as 11 months old (though in reality it’s identical to that of their son’s at the same age). And if you think that parents acting on those expectations won’t alter their children’s development, then I have a sloped bridge to sell you.

c3rvida3:

c3rvida3:

My friend is trying to name herself, and she’s like, “Oh, what’s that name that’s like marmalade, but it’s a name?” and I know she means Adelaide, but I think I can talk her into naming herself Marmalade if I play my cards right here.

Not in a hateful, cruel way, but because my name is Newt, and I think “Newt & Marmalade” sounds like a detective agency that solves mysteries for tiny garden critters.

infectiouspiss:

2026

  • FUCK HARD
  • FUCK FAST
  • FUCK BADLY
  • NEVER USE GENERATIVE AI
  • CREATE JOY
  • MUSIC ALWAYS
  • PSPSPSPS AT KITTIES ON THE STREET
  • YUMMY SOUP
  • go see the doctor about that thing
  • BE TRANSGENDER
  • KISS YOUR FRIENDS
  • EAT CHEESE
  • NEVER KILL YOURSELF
  • THRIVE