we've got a life to love living.
advice that has literally saved and improved my life
would you rather have a truthberry or a lieberry
isnt lieberry where you get books?
i know that's right !!!!
Final Fantasy VIII. 1999.
can u make her internet famous
the floating head of wisdom
Please don't fall victim to internet misinformation. There is no floating head. It's a regular horse, it's neck is just hidden due to the position of the camera. I made an image to help you understand the what's actually going on.
Thank you for the clarification
The thing about the moon is maybe you don’t need to write a poem about the moon. The moon’s been done, we’ve discussed it. It’s a coin a mirror an eye a lantern in the darkness. It’s a rock in space. It’s the dang moon we’ve all seen it! Is there something you can notice that’s is more surprising than the moon???
just saw an image where the devil is saying not to draw nun yuri because it's blasphemous and then jesus is speaking a speech bubble with nun yuri in it like what are we even doing anymore
people can’t even do christonormativity right because most people aren’t even consciously aware of it and don’t think about it so you end up with shit like this
blog was terminated but tumblr restored it
“If the world chooses to become my enemy, I will fight like I always have.”
Support us on Patreon
"Racialised" is much better than PoC but I've been leaning a lot on the concept of racial markedness. Because that allows us to make statements like "the name Jamal is racially marked in USA". Rather than saying something like "Jamal is a PoC name", a nonsense statement, saying it's racially marked in USA allows us to contrast with societies like Albania or the Arab countries where the name Jamal is ordinary, thus unmarked.
It's a concept I've kind of imported from linguistic analysis; saying a speech pattern is more or less marked does not really allow us to avoid the subject of who's doing the marking. A statement like "womens' speech is more marked in Lakota" necessitates that we understand that it's the Lakota who are marking womens' speech. A foreigner can't tell the difference and probably doesn't understand why it would thus be weird to see a man using speech patterns associated with women, in the same way an Albanian wouldn't understand why USA people would think Jamal is a Black name.
You! You get it. In my view, if someone is saying "racialised" or "racially marked" without acknowledgement of context, they are doing it in a way that is gramatically incorrect.
Tetris (NES) (1989)