From: Noel O'B. <no...@ca...> - 2005-12-16 09:02:38
|
I think Python 2.2 is quite reasonable. In fact, I would say that Python 2.3 is quite reasonable too, but maybe some platforms still don't support it? I mean, if some software is still using a version of Python that came out X years ago, is it still being actively maintained? Regards, Noel On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 23:12 -0500, Alan G Isaac wrote: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Michael Haggerty apparently wrote: > > I also ask whether there are people who would be upset by > > jumping the Python version requirement directly to Python > > 2.2. > > How about 2.3? ;-) > http://www.python.org/2.3/highlights.html > Anyway, go for it! > > Cheers, > Alan Isaac > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gnuplot-py-users mailing list > Gnu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-py-users |