Other than the title, not much to change. Everything else got sanitized for other platforms awhile ago

you can still do the taboo edition for it i believe

this one hasn't been affected yet, but the other 2 no longer give you the option to change relationships.

ı hope devs would not change a thing, they already made their money and moved on other project so if it gets removed from the store, ı dont think thjat it will affect them much.

they will still change the games. 4 of mine that i know of were changed

Originally posted by BladeTurbo:

they will still change the games. 4 of mine that i know of were changed

Which ones?

Originally posted by Edge82:

Originally posted by BladeTurbo:

they will still change the games. 4 of mine that i know of were changed

Which ones?

all of superwriters games (secret summer, picture perfect, ect)

Originally posted by BladeTurbo:

Originally posted by Edge82:

Which ones?

all of superwriters games (secret summer, picture perfect, ect)

Ah okay thanks for letting me know. I just checked this game (downloaded it and all) Game page is still online, game is still the same. I guess superwriter is just very very careful. Which is okay from his perspective. "Whiteleaf Studio" changed all it´s games too as far as i know.

It's kind of ridiculous that the credit union is allowed to strong arm companies into conforming with their ideas... They are supposed to handle transactions and that's it. Now they're acting like the shadow government. I guess certain people were right all along.

Originally posted by ⛧ Jinkies! ⛧:

It's kind of ridiculous that the credit union is allowed to strong arm companies into conforming with their ideas... They are supposed to handle transactions and that's it. Now they're acting like the shadow government. I guess certain people were right all along.

huge amounts of backlash are happening right now against them with many ppl starting to wonder if the Government is just a front for them and we all know how the feds are it will be a matter of time till they step in to right things since no one no matter their political party likes to be told they are someone elses ♥♥♥♥♥

The question is whether the credit card companies are doing this entirely of their own accord, or are they being pressured by others? There have been lawsuits against Visa and Mastercard for allowing certain transactions or classes of transaction.

I'm not saying that the global duopoly are the good guys in all this, but they make a convenient shield if, say, whoever has control of the US government decides they want to suggest that they might have to look into potential monopolistic practices, if certain immoral abuses are allowed to continue...

What really bothers me is the way this is targeting gaming. You don't see them pressuring HBO over Game of Thrones or Amazon over any number of books, just video games with incest content. Which, by the way, is not illegal, unlike other types of things like underage content. So they aren't doing this to comply with laws or anything, they are doing it for personal morality reasons. That's the opposite of what a neutral platform is supposed to do.

They'll go after all things sexual, soon enough. It's a huge Puritan backlash, partially fuelled by the exaggerated Epstein fears, causing the conservative types to clutch their pearls and blame it all on "degeneracy", and partly the broader backlash against LGBTQ activism and censorship of opposition... Pendulum swinging ...

The only hope is to push the "think of the children!" movement, to more sensitive grounds - guns and violence in media/games. Then the masses will feel the discomfort and that might give pause to the censors.

In all honesty, chopping someone's head off is a far more disturbing in-game experience than fantasy role-play with polygons. And gangs are already influenced by movies and video games (GTA is phenomenally popular with many gangbangers), so there's plenty of grounds for pushing for "safety" and "wholesomeness" on that front.

Originally posted by mach77:

They'll go after all things sexual, soon enough. It's a huge Puritan backlash, partially fuelled by the exaggerated Epstein fears, causing the conservative types to clutch their pearls and blame it all on "degeneracy", and partly the broader backlash against LGBTQ activism and censorship of opposition... Pendulum swinging ...

The only hope is to push the "think of the children!" movement, to more sensitive grounds - guns and violence in media/games. Then the masses will feel the discomfort and that might give pause to the censors.

In all honesty, chopping someone's head off is a far more disturbing in-game experience than fantasy role-play with polygons. And gangs are already influenced by movies and video games (GTA is phenomenally popular with many gangbangers), so there's plenty of grounds for pushing for "safety" and "wholesomeness" on that front.

See the problem here is that you frame it as though it were an entirely rightwing issues. The problem is that there is an exactly identical group on the left who also supports this kind of censorship. We need to stop 'same teaming' these people and oppose censorship on the grounds of opposing censorship.

Originally posted by Neon Robot:

Originally posted by mach77:

They'll go after all things sexual, soon enough. It's a huge Puritan backlash, partially fuelled by the exaggerated Epstein fears, causing the conservative types to clutch their pearls and blame it all on "degeneracy", and partly the broader backlash against LGBTQ activism and censorship of opposition... Pendulum swinging ...

The only hope is to push the "think of the children!" movement, to more sensitive grounds - guns and violence in media/games. Then the masses will feel the discomfort and that might give pause to the censors.

In all honesty, chopping someone's head off is a far more disturbing in-game experience than fantasy role-play with polygons. And gangs are already influenced by movies and video games (GTA is phenomenally popular with many gangbangers), so there's plenty of grounds for pushing for "safety" and "wholesomeness" on that front.

See the problem here is that you frame it as though it were an entirely rightwing issues. The problem is that there is an exactly identical group on the left who also supports this kind of censorship. We need to stop 'same teaming' these people and oppose censorship on the grounds of opposing censorship.

Indeed there are Leftists (mostly Feminist) who push for censorship and cancelling things (the extremist LGBTQ and anti-racist types, for example), but the current legal issues are from the US,where the Republicans are in charge and have already vocalised their intention to go after pornography (in all forms), as well as an Australian family values/conservative group (can't recall the name, but Vee did a youtube video on it) who got Visa/Mastercard to take on their concerns, and got Steam to fold and banish ~400 games.

The Left in their extremist nutty vanguard, create the climate for general public disgust of their actions, ushering in reactionary types along with The Right.

And worse, in Britain, we have an ostensibly Leftist/Socialist government, trying to win over the family values vote, by the most draconian anti-porn/age-restriction and total surveillance means.

The Left are also compromised by the fact that their LGBTQ contingent are completely against restrictions on pornography, while Feminists are split on it being empowering/exploitative...

The Right doesn't have such a schism. There's only the conservatives who want rid of it (even blaming it for the fall in births) and small state/fiscal conservatives who just want to reduce the tax theft and government size.

I'll admit I was sympathetic to and supportive of The Right, when The Left were going balls to the wall cancelling people, preventing discussions on important topics and pushing their lunacy.

The Right was supposed to be Free Speech absolutist, to welcome all ideas, in the understanding that bad ideas would be defeated by good ideas ... The Right was going to reduce government and regulations ...

Sadly, they're doing the opposite.

Also, it is conservatives that pushed for the US to use its influence to get Japan to change their stance on porn and hentai ... Japan!

I don't support either team, I just acknowledge that I was taken in by The Right...