I like her

I like her

yesterday I had the thought "visual novel for normal people" (?) and halfway through making this image (which I thought would be really funny) I realized it was completely meaningless

yesterday I had the thought "visual novel for normal people" (?) and halfway through making this image (which I thought would be really funny) I realized it was completely meaningless

Si hombre pero que dise tu

Si hombre pero que dise tu

A BIRD POOPED ON MY HEAD ON THE WAY TO WORK.

A BIRD POOPED ON MY HEAD ON THE WAY TO WORK.

HOW DO YOU KNOW THE BIRD WAS ON THE WAY TO WORK?

DONT MAKE ME ANGRIER THAN I AM

helpful stuff for when you want to fuck that old man

helpful stuff for when you want to fuck that old man

My DM's making very smart decisions tonight /affectionate

My DM's making very smart decisions tonight /affectionate

He says it tastes like melted plastic, good sign

My DM’s making very smart decisions tonight /affectionate

artfight for @shpepyao !! more wings!!! yay!!!!!!!!

AF isn't over yet - catch me on ~serrangelic while I wrap up the season :D

artfight for @shpepyao !! more wings!!! yay!!!!!!!!

AF isn't over yet - catch me on ~serrangelic while I wrap up the season :D

recently my friend's comics professor told her that it's acceptable to use gen AI for script-writing but not for art, since a machine can't generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sister's screenwriting professor said that they can use gen AI for concept art and visualization, but that it won't be able to generate a script that's any good. and at my job, it seems like each department says that AI can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

It's only ever the jobs we're unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation. The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts, and occupations, the more we realize that gen AI will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to do everything we don't.

recently my friend's comics professor told her that it's acceptable to use gen AI for script-writing but not for art, since a machine can't generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sister's screenwriting professor said that they can use gen AI for concept art and visualization, but that it won't be able to generate a script that's any good. and at my job, it seems like each department says that AI can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

It's only ever the jobs we're unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation. The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts, and occupations, the more we realize that gen AI will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to do everything we don't.

The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to do everything we don’t