Hi, I’m Kat. I reblog whatever the fuck I want here. Once in a blue moon I’ll come out of my cave and actually post something myself.

Sideblogs:

@los-ninos-tortugas (TMNT)

@cosmical-animal-crossing (self-explanatory)

@citykittywrites (writing blog- currently under construction)

ko-fi

loopy-lupe:

image

And that’s a wrap! Here’s the whole set together! It was real fun and a really good learning experiment working on all of these. I hope you enjoyed!

(Please do not repost without permission!)

(via wisecrownvoid)

fierceawakening:

ohifonlyx33:

byjoveimbeinghumble:

image
image
image
image
image

byjoveimbeinghumble:

ā€œKaynemaile has worked tirelessly to perfect the material science behind beautiful architectural mesh, collaborating with architects and designers on projects that embolden urban environments with positive buildings. The company’s patented polycarbonate mesh, inspired by 2,000-year-old medieval chainmail, was initially created for the armor and weapons seen in the The Lord of The Rings movie trilogy and is now used on major architectural projects around the world.

ā€œThe film’s art director and Kaynemaile’s founder Kayne Horsham worked with his team to construct each garment from plastic plumbing tubes, coating them in pure silver. Once filming wrapped, Horsham dedicated himself to creating a change to the liquid state assembly process to mass produce the polycarbonate chainmail for architectural applications — products that were light, but strong enough to protect the interior or exterior of a building. Now an industry-leading manufacturer, Kaynemaile produces mesh for everything from small interior screens to large scale exterior faƧades. Their mesh is easy to install and can be custom created for specialized applications.ā€

https://architizer.com/blog/practice/materials/kaynemaile-mesh-facade-systems/

phoxxent:

septembersung:

byjoveimbeinghumble:

ā€˜Are these magic cloaks?’ asked Pippin, looking at them. with wonder.

ā€˜I do not know what you mean by that,’ answered the leader of the Elves. ā€˜They are fair garments, and the web is good, for it was made in this land. They are Elvish robes certainly, if that is what you mean. Leaf and branch, water and stone: they have the hue and beauty of all these things under the twilight of Lorien that we love; for we put the thought of all that we love into all that we make.ā€

- Fellowship of the Ring, Chapter 8: Farewell to Lorien

This is how I think of Jackson’s movies. Yes, there are serious flaws - Gandalf’s de-powering, Gimli as comic relief, and Faramir, namely - but come on.

Remember when the guys making their chain mail invented a new method for quickly producing large amounts of it by hand? Remember Miranda Otto walking down the street, practicing sword positions? The guys who forged all of the swords - for leads and for extras? The men and women riders who volunteered to be riders of Rohan? The costume designers who designed the inside of Theoden’s armor (which no one would ever see) so beautifully that Bernard Hill said he felt like a king? The friendships between the cast, and their size doubles, and the stuntmen?

itspileofgoodthings:

I know that Peter’s Jackson Lord of the Rings trilogy technically has flaws but also….it doesn’t. It’s perfect.

When they made that movie, they put all that they loved into all that they made.

#just hundreds of people who went ā€˜sure let me try this’ #and they made something breathtaking #and then they made it 12 more times in different sizesĀ ( @byjoveimbeinghumble​ )

Wait tell me more about that chainmail thing

YOU GUYS

they took forced perspective and scaled sets to a new level by adding moving set pieces to create the illusion that the hobbits and dwarves were much smaller than everyone else even when the camera moved.

every scene you see in the 11+ hours of glory that is the LOTR masterpiece is most like ridiculously elaborate or expensive–from model towers to the all-new motion capture technology used for gollum to the costumes and sets to the aerial on location shots of mother-fracking new zealand and the big impressive battle scenes and horse charges.

but then the story and the screenplay too–there is just SO much lore that is there in the background lurking if you want to look for it, yet it still remains simplified for the average viewer. Crazy impressive feat.

And the acting is heartfelt and real and makes you love the characters.

ALSO DON’T GET ME STARTED ON FREAKING HOWARD SHORE AND HIS 100+ HEARTSHATTERINGLY BEAUTIFUL LIETMOTIFS AND BRILLIANT SUBTLE VARIATIONS IN THE FLIPPING 13 HOUR SOUNDTRACK. AND ENYA SINGING IN REAL ELVISH.

I loved the books long before the movies came out and… yes, this.

I disagree with a few choices here and there but they’re really, really good.

(via silentsnowdrop)

Anonymous asked:

if your brother thinks he should be from the 1960s maybe you could draw him & only him from that era. worst possible compromise. even greater anachronisms.

stealingpotatoes Answer:

noble from the 1530s, astronaut from the 1960s, basically the same thing nooo anachronisms here

image

prezaki:

image
image


If I had to pick one line that is at the heart of the movie, it’s this one.

The movie (rightfully) comes right out and asks you to think about Grace, to fill the blank in the way people talk about her and see her as a full-fledged person who was suffering horribly. In contrast, it leans on the Creepy Little Girl aesthetic for young Martha and plays the emotional impact all this had on her close to the chest - until this line.

Prentice was like a father to her, the person she loved and most respected in the whole world. And he killed himself right in front of her, out of spite for his daughter. No matter what devotion Martha would heap on him, she would never be more worth living for than hurting Grace was worth dying for. She’s what, 11 then?

Of course she lords this over Grace. This one way in which she can feel like she’s been chosen (when it reality she’s been very much abandoned instead). She is childishly hanging onto something that makes the loss and the horror feel like it can be Worth something. A way in which she is loved.

Her whole life, she clings to that: the good one, not the bad one. If she’s not tied to the image of the ā€˜Harlot Whore’, does she even exist?

And maybe she doesn’t. It’s a running gag that she goes unnoticed. The Church is hers, she runs all of it, but she is unseen. The Good One doesn’t seek attention. The Good One doesn’t desire.

The Good One is a perpetual child even in her 70s, innocent to the point of parody. The Good One doesn’t know what a penis looks like, she is not a whore, she does not desire! (Rocket ships, what a funny scene! Surely not saying anything about her lifelong torment!)

The Good One cannot do anything but sneak a small smile when the man she loves displays his desire for her. But she can’t want back.

image

She has to deny herself, so she can believe her father would still love her. Else, what has it all been for?

(via fastidious-and-a-mess)


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk