Avatar

WE ARE KEEPING ONE ANOTHER ON THIS EARTH.

@vermilionstarlight

A LIVING THING IS ALIVE, AND IT THINKS, AND LOVES, AND THEN IN AN INSTANT IT'S MEAT. AND FOR A PRECIOUS FEW SECONDS. ITS BOTH. (pfp by @kinou)

i think we are what we choose to become.

I'm Valerie, 19 yrs old. I'm from the USA, and I use any pronouns. I'm the coolest transfaggot ever and I'm also the only correct leftist; all other leftists are either stupid and wrong OR simply a passable homunculus made in a flawed image of my own ideology. Also I'm probably autistic or something? Or just abnormal. Whatever

This blog is pretty concretely nsfw even though I don't really hornypost constantly. Rarely will I ever rb outright porn. Expect statistically significant (but not overwhelming) amounts of suggestive posts, bloodgore freak shit, and objectum mechanical freak shit. Block #suggestive, #nudity, #hauve, #sploosh, and #kerchunk respectively if that's a concern.

You should really take a look at Severance (show), Pluribus (show), CAIN (ttrpg), Disco Elysium (game), Deltarune (game), The Daily Grind (book), and Slay the Princess (game). I talk about them sometimes. I also like politics and philosophy and sociology and shit. Violence is fun (I like wrestling) and I like bloodgore freak kink shit. See: aforementioned abnormality.

Uhh. Leftism good, socialism and communism and shit are good, TERFs and Zionists bad, antisemitism is bad, freak kink shit is fine as long as you're not stupid about it (I am an enjoyer of freak kink shit), gender is made up and dumb, generative ai is basically just demontech (metaphorically), religion is interesting but kinda sucks, love trans people forever. Don't be evil. You can get a non-summarized version of most of my politics if you dig for it but I don't care enough to write it here. You get the gist.

And here's a little master list of my minecraft fantasy stuff so I don't lose track of them. Haven't updated this in a long time. Three quarters of it is likely non canon shit I've come up with better lore and worldbuilding for. Maybe I'll get to it some day. Feel free to take a gander.

sometimes you just want people to be scared to look but unable to tear their eyes away. to be simultaneously repelled and compelled. yknow?

having anti role models is a beautiful thing. it's not easy to live up to someone else's behavior but it is easy to lasso yourself into behaving right when you realize you're reminding yourself of the worst person youve ever met in your entire life

every story should have a character that is either textually a survivor of sexual trauma or can subtextually be understood to have undergone a metaphorical sexual trauma. this is imperative. story cant be good otherwise.

people who put their gum under tables are wild animals they literally do not have higher level cognitive functions. they live in nature.

Avatar
moonlandingwasfaked

calling them wild animals is an insult to nature

sorry you’re right i should’ve said baboons

Avatar
ryu1964

I call my father Babbu but I hate my father Die father

Die Babbu

Avatar
ryu1964

^ This Die Babbu

Avatar
ryu1964

Hell on babbu technique

Wait wait wait.

I thought we made fun of MRAs because they are misguided and misogynistic for believing that feminism is against their interests and they need a movement apart from it. I thought we made fun of them for not understanding that feminism is in favor of men's liberation from the oppressive patriarchal binary as much as women's.

But some of you are actually making fun of MRAs because you think men have no problems to complain about, and feminism ISN'T for men, because they don't need anything, and the patriarchy isn't the enemy, men are?

Oooh I don't think we've been laughing at the same thing. You have lost the plot.

I thought we made fun of people who said "not all men" in response to women discussing sexism because while they are correct that not all men [insert bad behavior here], saying so in certain conversations is just a defensive knee jerk reaction that distracts from the point.

But some of you are actually making fun of any men who ask to be taken seriously and have their needs met and issues heard, even though they aren't talking over women? Some of you are making fun of marginalized men for talking about the experiences at their unique intersections of identities and asking for justice because you actually DO think "all men [insert bad behavior here]?"

Oooooh you are failing feminism 101. You do not understand what the patriarchy even is. You do not understand where its power comes from, who benefits from it, and who is harmed by it. You have not progressed beyond "cooties" level discourse. I am not laughing with you.

This is why you sound like a clown if you call transmasculine people talking about their issues "TMRAs." If you hear men discussing the ways they are harmed by the existing system and the only thing you can think of is obnoxious MRAs, you're telling on yourself. You're broadcasting the fact that you haven't spent enough time engaging with broad feminist viewpoints to know that men's liberation ideas (NOT the same as MRA) are a part of feminism and have been for a long time.

This is why you sound like a clown if you say "trans men who want feminism to be for them are misgendering themselves" and "trans men benefit from the patriarchy because all men benefit from the patriarchy" and "trans men experience no unique injustices because misandry isn't a systemic axis of oppression" and "trans men have male privilege so they can't be oppressed."

Because even if you take "trans" out of these statements, they're still incorrect. Feminism is for people of all genders. Men can be harmed by the patriarchy. The ways in which men are harmed by the patriarchy are different from the ways others are harmed by the patriarchy. Having certain "privileges" in certain contexts doesn't negate the harm of a rigid social structure that punishes nonconformity.

Men can oppose the patriarchy because they want justice for others AND for themselves. There's nothing wrong with that. Giving them shit for talking about that is NOT helping take down the patriarchy.

The patriarchy is not a war of men against women where men are given all the advantages. That's not what feminism is up against.

The patriarchy is a system where ALL people have rigid roles imposed upon them. All else being equal, certain advantages are more likely to be given to men (or masculine people, or people AMAB, or people with male sex characteristics, depending on CONTEXT). But all else is RARELY equal and even when it is, the range of experiences is vast, and the system is rigged against almost everyone.

Because the goal most individuals have, and the right all individuals deserve, is to be themselves, and to do so by choice. And no matter who you are, the patriarchy stands in opposition to this goal. It tells you who you're allowed to be, who you're not allowed to be, what you're allowed to do, and what others are allowed to do to you. This is an injustice for people of all genders.

We're ALL trapped. This system can only be dismantled if we understand the WHOLE thing. Which means we need to listen to everyone when they talk about the harms the system is causing them, from where THEY'RE stuck in it.

How are you going to escape the torture mansion if you don't understand vast swathes of it because you've mistaken your brother for the enemy and closed your ears to him? He's shouting from the torture chamber next to yours, trying to tell you the layout of the room he sees so you can plan your escape together, and you're refusing to listen because he's been given more food and water than you? How do you not see that this attitude is only to the benefit of the torture mansion, not its victims?

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.