There is a really frustrating thing where some kinds of speculative story are hard to write because they will be assumed to be bad (clumsy, harmful, regressive) metaphors for real-world events or people, rather than exploring completely speculative ideas. Like:
“What if a small group of religious extremists, persecuted in their own country, moved to an inhospitable uninhabited island and had to rebuild society there?” - But the Americas and Australia weren’t inhospitable and were full of Native nations, why are you perpetuating the idea of Terra Nullius and manifest destiny? - Yes, that’s because this isn’t a metaphor for the British invading other countries, it’s a metaphor for finding out how much of a person’s religious practise is rooted in worldly concerns, vs how much they will really stymie themselves for the sake of God.
“What if 1/100 children born was a werewolf?” - But queer people are no danger to straight people, and disabled people don’t have predictable patterns to their illnesses, and most people who have uncontrollable rages really CAN control them and are just lying, and no minority group has superpowers… - Yes, but that’s all immaterial, because I wanted to talk about a load of other metaphors about the passage of time and responsibility and the relationship between humans and wildlife.
It almost feels like death of the author, like “Death of the most obvious metaphor” - If you couldn’t reach for the (tormented) parallel between being an alien species and being stateless, what stories could someone tell? If your changeling-baby was neither disabled nor adopted, what would the story be about? Etc.
I was literally just thinking about this yesterday! It’s a trend I’ve seen a LOT in recent years in lit crit, particularly when discussing fantasy.
I think it particularly comes up the moment an author includes any sort of marginalisation/oppression for their fictional/fantasy world. I’ve lost count of the times now where I’ve seen people read a book on, say, the terrible oppression of the Gwyllion, and immediately gone “Oh, so the Gwyllion are a metaphor for the real world X people, either deliberately or accidentally through the author’s inherent racism. This is therefore super problematic because the Gwyllion are also described as Y, which means the author is also saying that about X people.”
There will always be real world parallels when discussing oppression. Always. But that’s because oppression is oppression - precise details may vary, but it follows the same pathways the world over, and that will naturally be copied into fiction as well. This does not mean the author is intentionally telling the exact allegory that you’ve projected onto it. If that’s how you read everything, then yeah, everything becomes super problematic, but also, why are you reading any fiction that isn’t solely about real world historical events? It’s clearly not for you
And, you know, obviously there are works that are racist/misogynistic/etc, including deliberately so. But I really don’t like the way people have started going “I have spotted a PROBLEMATIC ALLEGORY here, I’m ever so smart” and acting like they’re the cleverest little critic that ever lived. You have to meet a work on its own terms. Lovecraft was a big ole racist, sure. Someone who has written a book about the oppression of magic users in their fantasy world, however, is rarely writing a story about how queerness lurks in family lines and must be controlled; they are way more commonly writing a story about a world with magic that they then wanted to take seriously, and while there might well be elements of queerness there, those magic users are not a 1:1 replacement.
Sometimes these lines are blurry! But we’re going way too far to one end of that spectrum
The post that got me thinking about this yesterday was someone talking about how they’d love to write a vampire story exploring vampirism as a disability (dependence on a substance to manage the condition, blindness/weakness in daytime, can’t enter buildings without accommodation, etc). But, they said, they can’t, because they don’t want to be making the point that disabled people are parasites, and vampires are generally considered parasitic.
And like. What an incredible shame. That we’ll lose that, because they’re already afraid of the “I have spotted a PROBLEMATIC ALLEGORY” crowd. That would be a great story for exploring disability themes, OR just a great new take on vampires, and either of those things would be so good to read. But there would be so many people who would jump in with “So you think disabled people are draining the life force of the ableds around them?”, never stopping to actually think “Vampires are not a 1:1 stand in for real world disability because they are fictional and do not exist.”
Anyway sorry I’ve rambled here, not sure how coherent I’m being. But yes, I was thinking about this just yesterday! Wild.
How clearly does the point need to be made that “police officer” is just a fucking job, one with minimal training and minimal monitoring. It is NOT some kind of promise of honesty, truth, or heroism. It is a bunch of assistant managers with extremely powerful weapons. IF you can understand “pedophiles choose to be priests and teachers so they can get to children”, IF you understand “arsonists choose to be firefighters so they can be present at their own crimes” - then you can ALSO understand “people who are bigoted, violent, and power-hungry choose to be cops for the opportunities the job presents” and you can ALSO understand “any occupational culture that chooses fraternity over justice - and the allowance of violence in the name of a unified front - is therefore siding with their worst representatives”
being a police officer is an entry-level job, and we are handing them weapons. nothing about their occupation automatically makes them smarter, quicker, braver, or in any way elite. there is very little in their onboarding process that would allegedly “weed out” the worst of the applicants - and once they are part of the fraternity, they’re not gonna leave.
we have been taught to respect, honor, and worship them by virtue of a job title they barely even had to try for. they sign no contract, swear no vow, and make no promise to the general public. it is a community that is extolled above others and given virtually no oversight. think about the kind of people who would be attracted to that opportunity. the adage: power corrupts. absolute power corrupts absolutely.
circling this back around to say FUCK ICE, and fuck you if you willingly support them just because they’re “a federal agent” and therefore “deserve respect”.
ICE officers are a fucking privatized militia they do not have authority over united states citizens and none of their so-called “purpose” requires live rounds and weapons. It is entirely made up of fascist racist dickbags with no fucking training. they are lower than scum. they’re police-school dropouts with no fucking spine. there is no honor in their position. they accomplish nothing but terrorizing communities they don’t even fucking live in.
Any!! occupation or government !! that chooses fraternity over justice - and the allowance of violence in the name of a unified front - is therefore siding with their worst representatives.
im actually a professional arknights niche challenge player. my niche challenge genre is “favoriteknights”. it’s a challenge where i only use operators i like. it’s very professional.
Green sea turtles have been an iconic endangered species since the 1980s, mostly due to bycatch in fishing nets and taking adults and eggs for food. I have core childhood memories of watching Steve Irwin talk about sea turtle conservation in front of a beach full of nesting green sea turtles.
After 45 years of conservation efforts, their population now meets the IUCN criteria for Least Concern rather than Endangered.
For a species with such a slow life history (it takes green sea turtles decades to reach sexual maturity) and a nearly global population, this is a Really Big Deal. This is the kind of long term conservation victory that many of the amazing humans who started working on green sea turtle conservation back in the 80s didn’t live to see.
Just because something isn’t fixed right away doesn’t mean it won’t ever be fixed. Just because the work is slow doesn’t mean it isn’t worth doing.
we should globally ban the introduction of more powerful computer hardware for 10-20 years, not as an AI safety thing (though we could frame it as that), but to force programmers to optimize their shit better
I reblogged this like 9 times kinda jokingly, but software should be able to run on older and less powerful hardware, and consume less power on newer hardware. Like, this is a real problem imo
I completely agree with this but I do need you to understand that the image above is 32 times the size of the lunar mission’s memory
This is what the image looked like compressed to 4 kb
ALT
