Avatar

skunkitty

@witchshut

Marcy Rose or Al. ⬆️ 18. TME. Perisex. Mixed black&lightskin. Racially ambiguous. Moderate physical disability and mild cognitive disability.
ΘΔ Thing. It/its. dr baby kitten buggy. I like bugs. Ask me about them.
Reblog and described art account: @witchsreblogs
[Icon ID: Chip from Wachifield, a small and fuzzy black cat.]

Pinned

[ID: Chip from Wachifield, a black cat, sitting on a window seal like a human.

White text on a dark red background that reads it/rot/burn/goth/haunt. End ID.]

Marcy Rose or Al. dr baby kitten buggy. And trying to get FAT! I’m merely cosplaying as human, but I also take the form of a cat and a skunk and a beetle and a tentacled beast. I am also a thorny rose plant to take great care of. Feed me! Take care of my soil! Let me grow!!!

Plants have feelings and deserve the same rights as animals. Anti-transmasculinity doesn’t exist. What are some other inflammatory takes I genuinely believe in. If you call people stupid, dumb, insane, or any other ableist or saneist slur in a way that is downpunching, either fix that or leave.

#🐢💙 for posts about Sayori.

#locked behind a cat door for stuff to come back to. Bunches of mutual aid posts here so you should look at that. Primarily this tag is for myself.

#🦨my art for stuff I draw.

Tags to filter or other auxiliary tags under the read more.

honestly I think most people actually underestimate how much impact you can have on someone through an online "debate" but mostly because they're not very good at it. debates are for the audience, if you follow debate templates when you're trying to change a specific person's mind you've already made a mistep down the wrong path. if you wanna changes someone's mind you first have to find the root belief which the others grow from and then challenge that with verifiable evidence and sources. personal word does no good here because they'll have heard the counter arguments already, your job is to show that the counter arguments are stronger than the base argument, the belief that they hold. all ideologies have some kind of escape hatch, and way to deal with conflicting ideas, otherwise they wouldn't disagree in the first place, your job is to find that escape hatch and show how it too fails. once you've done these two things about the root of a belief, anyone engaging in good faith will have a lot to consider and will likely start the process of changing their views over time. another mistake here is expecting the changes immediately and pushing them. if you push you'll get shutdown and lose progress if anything. let them think on it themselves, give it a few days or even months, feel free to check back later and see how it's going.

the hard part is actually finding the root belief, providing convincing sources, and actually combatting the "out" they're familiar with.

for example, a very common out to being presented communist ideas, is that it doesn't work in practice, and that it's adherents have kill a bajillion people. while there are ways around this if you avoid certain key phrases, if you talk about communism for any length of time you'll be confronted with it. 100 billion dead is a funny meme sure, but it's a genuine stopgap which keeps people from questioning if socialist revolution is actually beneficial, so having sources on hand and a working knowledge of how and where these claims go wrong, to show that you've not just not encountered the billion dead information, but that you've interrogated it and have a firmer and more well rounded understanding of the issue, they will be far more likely adapt elements of your views as their own, and it should free them up to consider ideas they would've otherwise shut down as silly.

or, they can just ignore you, so. you do still have to be careful lol, and you can also make wrong steps especially if you misidentifying what's actually the keystone holding their beliefs together. most people make the mistake of combatting ideas which aren't actually the reason for someone's belief. maybe someone says 100 billion dead because it sounds like a good argument, but the real reason they dislike communism is because they had a personal friend who used to live in the USSR and told them about how bad it was, and if you don't address that, you'll never change their mind.

the games in deltarune chapter 3 being based on classic legend of zelda, especially in sword route, makes me think of that fact certain fandomites love to throw around about link being designed to be androgynous so the player could project onto link regardless of their gender, which is never put in context of the fact that every zelda game explicitly genders link as male. there have been two examples of link every even wearing women's clothes. that one official art of of toon link in a cheerleader outfit, and breath of the wild's orientalist outfit. there are, on a technicality in the second, two cases of link being a woman, that one official art of female link, which was a misunderstanding caused by the androgynous design, and linkle, who is not actually female link but just a girl who incorrectly thinks she is the hero of legend.

So in deltarune chapter 3's sword route, you play as kris playing as themself in a legend or zelda inspired game where you kill everyone, and it ends with that reflection of kris leaving that game and kris being afraid of that version of themself. the one based on nominally androgynous but ultimately male link. and so many people just refuse to come to any conclusion based on any of that. that this version of kris goes through events which mirror the weird route is not something they are willing to think about.

the idea that the weird route is exploring transmisogyny by forcing kris into the traditionally masculine role of the achetypical video game protagonist feels so fucking obvious to me that i sometimes forget how mad some people get when you point this out

Worst semantic drift in trans discourse by far is how "transmed" got butchered.

Transmedicalism used to refer to people who were fully complicit with the idea that transness should be decided by medical institutions, and that only a few true transsexuals should get to access any form of medical transition. It referred to the types who genuinely believe that, for instance, lesbian trans women in general are just fetishists.

Nowadays, "transmed" gets thrown at people who advocate for accessing care without relying on these institutions, or even just suggest that medical transition can be good for someone.

It's effectively been co-opted entirely from a criticism of people who advocate for compliance with power structures, to an accusation thrown at people directly opposed to those same structures.

Like please understand that the people encouraging medical transition also support broadening access to medical transition for everyone, and aren't attacking you for having a hard time getting it.

pokeballvictim

no but seriously we should be de-stigmatizing bottom surgery for trans women. Gender affirming care fucking rules and trans women should be able to pursue what feels the best for each of us. I hate the oversexualized image of a "chick with a dick" and just because I like to express lust doesn't mean that I think its okay to treat trans women like we're a fetish object. Idk. You know what I mean, I trust. I'm rambling a bit.

what's the deal with donbass/ukraine? i kinda took the us media narrative at face value with that whole situation which i now realize was a mistake. do you have any posts/articles/videos you can recommend about what the actual situation is?

Avatar

I’ll try and give you a quick off-the-cuff history and then some links and such. Essentially, in the late 1980s, as the USSR entered terminal decline, there emerged a sharp dividing line between the Russian-speaking East and Ukrainian-speaking West. In 1989, the People’s Movement of Ukraine, an antisemitic Ukrainian nationalist organisation aiming to have Ukraine secede from the Union, was founded, drawing strong support from Western Ukraine. In response, the International Movement of Donbass was formed in 1990 by intellectuals in Lugansk and Donetsk, with substantial backing from miners. It promoted federalism after the collapse of the USSR, opposed nationalism, and supported the Soviet Union. The organisation also opposed the Ukrainianisation of Donbass (to understand why that’s a bad thing, read this post). Interfront also organised a lot of protests that went largely ignored by the Ukrainian government and coined the now semi-famous phrase in my house of “Donetsk is oriented towards Moscow,” a sentiment that became increasingly popular throughout the 1990s and 2000s.

In 1994, a referendum in Donetsk and Lugansk showed that around 90% of residents supported Russian becoming a co-official language alongside Ukrainian. This result was disregarded at the federal level. During this same period, nationalist and openly neo-Nazi parties such as the Social National Party were gaining traction in Western Ukraine, promoting conspiracies such as there being a “Muscovite-Jewish mafia” controlling Ukraine and equating Russian language use with mental degeneracy. Western Ukraine increasingly aligned itself with Europe and the West, while southeastern Ukraine, especially Donbass, remained oriented toward Russia and retained a strong Soviet identity.

In 1997, the Party of Regions was formed, drawing its support base primarily from Donbass and eastern Ukraine. It promoted regionalism, opposed nationalism, leaned toward Russia, and rejected EU integration. It was a centre-left party and was affiliated with the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats. Although initially weak, it later gained mass support due to the absence of viable political alternatives for the region.

Then there was the Orange Revolution of 2004–2005, during which a right-wing pro-Western/EU coalition made up of Pora!, Our Ukraine (liberal conservative political party), the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc (pro-EU populist coalition), and the Ukrainian National Assembly (Ukrainian irredentist/nationalist, anti-communist, and neo-Nazi political organisation and paramilitary group), and thousands of protesters in the centre and west of the country came out to demonstrate against the democratically elected president, Donetsk native Viktor Yanukovych of the Party of Regions. Essentially, the coalition and protesters, supported by the US and Poland, argued the election had been stolen and that pro-West, NATO- and EU-aligned Viktor Yushchenko was the actual winner of the election. Yushchenko publicly called for protest. Local councils in the centre and west of the country passed legislation stating that they would not recognise Yanukovych as president. As it became more and more likely that these protests would actually do something, the Communist Party of Ukraine and the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine formed a coalition with the Party of Regions against the Yushchenko bloc and organised mass protests across the East, again especially in Donbass. This is the birthplace of Donbass federalism. As the Orange Revolution continued and the Yushchenko bloc was clearly winning, we get the Sievierodonetsk Congress, where the Lugansk Oblast Council announced they had decided by a majority vote to create a Southeastern Ukrainian Autonomous Republic. Of course, by the next month the election results were annulled by the Supreme Court, and Yushchenko came to power, and the federalisation demands of the people and organisations that represented them in the East were strongly condemned.

In 2005, the Donetsk Republic movement was founded and banned in 2007, further increasing unrest in Donbass. While the organisation itself was not universally supported, its banning was widely opposed.

In the 2010 presidential election, Yanukovych won in elections the Central Election Commission and international observers declared were conducted freely and fairly.

In the 2012 Verkhovna Rada elections, the neo-fascist and anti-Russian Svoboda party, a member of the neo-Nazi Nation Europa network and formerly the Social-National Party of Ukraine, received two million votes, primarily from Western Ukraine. Two years later, Svoboda would establish their own Sturmabteilung, called the Sich Battalion, which was incorporated into Ukraine’s military and police apparatus under the Ministry of Internal Affairs in 2015.

In 2012, legislation allowing regions with significant non-Ukrainian-speaking populations to grant co-official language status partially eased decades of language conflict in Donbass.

By 2013–2014, protests erupted across central and Western Ukraine after Yanukovych declined to sign an EU association agreement in favour of closer ties with Russia. These protests, already right-wing in character, were quickly overtaken by openly neo-Nazi groups. In January–February 2014, the so-called “Revolution of Dignity,” (commonly called the Euromaidan revolution) a Western-backed coup carried out with neo-Nazi participation, overthrew Yanukovych. Opposition existed nationwide but was strongest in Donetsk and Lugansk, regions that had overwhelmingly supported him.

In April 2014, protesters in Donetsk occupied the regional administration building. Shortly afterward, protesters in Lugansk stormed the Security Service of Ukraine building, demanding the release of detained Anti-Euromaidan activists. Similar occupations spread throughout the region. The Ukrainian government responded by announcing it would resolve the so-called “separatist problem” in Donbass, which was at that stage still a movement for federalisation, by negotiation or force within 48 hours. Three days later, it officially launched the Anti-Terrorist Operation.

The Battle of Kramatorsk followed, during which the AFU killed 11 civilians.

Leaving Donbass for a minute, clashes were taking place in the southern city of Odessa between pro-Maidan groups: Maidan People’s Union (Ukrainian nationalist pro-EU alliance), Right Sector (religious extremist and Ukrainian nationalist neo-Nazi paramilitary group), Misanthropic Division (neo-Nazi paramilitary), football ultras, and the Social-National Assembly (political wing of Azov, basically; neo-fascist and neo-Nazi). And anti-Maidan groups: Youth Unity, Odessa Brigade, Jews Against Hurwitz, People’s Alternative, and Borotba (central political organisation in the clashes; Marxist-Leninist). On the 2nd of May, a massive clash took place between the two groups, causing the pro-Maidan protesters to destroy an anti-Maidan protest encampment, and more violence to be exchanged between the groups. Anti-Maidan protesters sought shelter in the Trade Unions House and barricaded themselves inside. Anti-Maidan protesters began throwing Molotov cocktails, causing the Trade Unions building to be set on fire. Thirty-two anti-Maidan activists burned to death or suffocated, and a further 10 died jumping out of windows to escape the fire, many being beaten to death by the pro-Maidan protesters once they landed. The police did nothing but stood by and watched. A European Court of Human Rights ruling in March 2025 found Ukraine responsible for failing to prevent fatalities and conduct an effective investigation into the events.

Shortly thereafter, Ukrainian forces drove tanks through Mariupol and opened fire on civilians during Victory Day and set the police station on fire, killing 26 people. When the Ukrainian army first arrived in Mariupol, many local men came out and attempted to stop the tanks with their own bare hands. I’ll see if I can find any photos. Those events in Mariupol and Odessa pushed most people over the line and became a massive recruitment drive for the newly created Donbass People’s Militias, which aimed to stop Ukrainian forces from advancing further into Donbass.

In June, the first Ukrainian airstrike on a Donbass city hit the Lugansk regional administration building, killing 13 people. At that point, federalisation within Ukraine was no longer seen as viable, and we have been at war ever since.

There is really no way to sum up the events of the past eleven years. Thousands have died. Due to the AFU’s targeting of civilians and the inclusion of anti-Russian neo-Nazi battalions, the popular opinion has long been that this is a genocide of us Russian-speaking and ethnic Russian or Russian-ethnicised people in the East. The Ukrainian military occupation of Donbass from the Minsk Agreements through to 2022 was marked by disappearances, murders, and general abuse of the population by the soldiers stationed there. The crime of separatism became punishable by 15 years in prison. Coming into 2022, only 14% of the Ukrainian population said they had a “somewhat favourable” view of Russian people. I don’t really want to explain anymore; I’m tired and this stuff distresses me LOL. But I’ll give you some links.

First and foremost I would recommend this post I complied of almost 50 links to articles about Donbass in the English Language from non Russian sources

And then also these

And if you’re willing to endure genuinely God awful translation, the following documents are literally verified testimonies of survivors of the Genocide in Donbass

It won’t let me add anymore but those should be enough

Avatar

Testimonies from survivors of Ukrainian occupation in Ugledar and Dzerzhynsk cities

Also probably worth mentioning the Ukrainian occupation administration in Donetsk putting out an official celebratory statement for Stephan Bandera’s birthday saying, quote, “On January 1, 2026, Ukraine will celebrate the 117th anniversary of Stepan Bandera's birth. For most Ukrainians today, the name Stepan Bandera is a symbol of the uncompromising and undying struggle for the Ukrainian nation's right to be the master of its own destiny on its own land... However, today we know that Ukraine's independence is not a hopeless cause, but a completed historical fact. And Stepan Andriyovych did not sacrifice his life in vain. Today, Ukraine is at war with Russia, which has encroached on its state independence and occupied part of its territory. The name of Stepan Bandera continues to resonate in this struggle: it frightens enemies and inspires Ukrainians.”

Avatar
Reblogged

Some sources on Donbass in English from non-Russian sources:

Israel is arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine - The Electronic Intifada

Civil War in Donbass 10 Years On - Global Delinquents

Ukraine timeline tells the tale - The Monthly Review

Fact Finding Mission to Donbass - Black Agenda Report

Collected in collaboration with Sibaj previously of the handle @Tatarstani and Kakhvise of the handle @kakhvisa

————————

For the sake of context: a quarter of Sibaj’s family resides within the borders of the Donetsk People’s Republic. She also lived for an extended period in the Donetsk Oblast prior to the outbreak of the Civil War and the Euromaidan revolution, and briefly returned there in 2019. Kakhvise has participated in three separate humanitarian aid missions to the Lugansk People’s Republic, in addition to working with Muslim internally displaced persons from Donbass. I myself am from the Donetsk People’s Republic. None of us are “Tankie Westerners” projecting ideological fantasies onto this conflict, nor are we Russian ethno-nationalists seeking to expand borders or justify violence against Ukrainians. In fact, none of us have Russian heritage at all.

Apologies if any heavy hitters were passed by, all three of us are Russian citizens, we do not regularly interact with Western Media!

I don't think some people realise how easy it is for personality-type frameworks to become tools of abuse. lol. here I am talking about astrology, but also mbti and the enneagram

my parents were always really into the enneagram. here's the thing about it: once you're told from a young age that you're the "emotional, melodramatic type", it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy in the worst way. every time you have an outburst (because your parents are abusing you) it's "oh sweetie this is just you being a classic type 4". any kind of complaint, no matter how reasonable it is, is framed back to you as a consequence of an innate set of personality traits, rather than a response to your environment. this is possible no matter what personality type system you use. including 'personality disorders' as described in the dsm

ESPECIALLY including the dsm

Text: Don’t act like everyone loved my father. He was assassinated. A 1967 poll reflected that he was one of the most hated men in America. Most hated. Many who quote him now and evoke him to deter justice today would likely hate, and may already hate, the authentic King.

I think there is not enough people talking about how much transmisogynoir is in “The Labels” episode of The Wonderfully Weird World of Gumball is. And by “not enough” I mean I literally have not seen one singular person give a shit. People are just accepting transmisogynoir in the media they consume and regurgitate, and this is very clear in the way people derive entertainment from the way that Gumball stylizes and mocks black ballroom culture, language, and looks. Not only does it call upon the “look” of blackness to reinforce nonblack superiority within a kids’ show, but it doubles down on its (trans)misogynoir through hypersexualization. I’ve seen people deny that Gumball is being sexualized, because twerking isn’t sexual, or whatever, but Gumball is being made to exhibit the “Sassy Queen” stereotype. In order to fulfill the image of a provocative, aggressive, and obnoxious black woman, he is given large thighs, a big butt, big lips, and a “sassy walk.” These traits are objectified by turning into visual traits that are “given” to Gumball, and then used to further Gumball’s “bad” persona. Where is the humor being derived? What type of woman is being invoked to be the punching bag here so that show can get a few laughs in? It is hard to watch the episode when it is so malicious with this type of visualization.

In “The Synthesis,” Nicole’s rapping is treated as destructive and aggressive, making a classroom of kids uncomfortable. In “The Promposal,” there is a bit where Gumball once again draws off AAVE/ballroom talk for the sake of making a joke that has no punchline other than, “isn’t it funny Gumball is talking like this?” But so far “The Labels” has been the worst when it comes to who it chooses to draw its humor from. And I’ve seen clips of it circulate the most.

Avatar
Reblogged

finding still existing blogs from 2010s on tumblr is like lifting up a massive moss covered rock and seeing da most beautiful bugs that barely see sunlight

There are so many people that are pro disability rights until they find out disabilities can be gross sometimes. It's so wild seeing the same people advocating for more mental health talk losing their shit over a depressed person not brushing their teeth or cleaning their spaces, or people who totally support physically disabled people until they find out I once pissed in a cup because I was in too much agony to get out of my bed, or that sometimes cups and food sit in my room longer than they should because I physically can't get up to put them away. Disabled people sometimes have incontinence, disabled people sometimes have bad hygiene, and still deserve to be supported. It's so fucking performative and it pisses me off. Even other disabled people act like this. Shaming people for stuff they can't control doesn't help anyone, just makes you an insufferable person.

This is doubly true for those who can't physically care for themselves (paraplegic, paralyzed, bedridden, etc.), who have facial irregularities that might expose flesh/"look gross", who have g-tubes and catheters and trachs and colostomies. It isn't their fault. If I see one more person make fun of adult diapers I'm gonna lose it. Disabled folk have enough on their plate.

my post: masculinity is seen as neutral in male-dominated society because it benefits men to be seen as the default every single fucking tag and reblog: idk man i see masculinity as neutral so i don't think it's that deep

If you believe that there is an epidemic of pedophilic trannies sexually assaulting people and forcing children to transition, that vigilante justice is required to stop it, and that you should take it out on the next tranny you see -- you are not at all uncommon. You find in your company a consensus of millions upon millions.

I hope you enjoy your company! In it, you are not the norm -- most of your allies do not use tumblr. They do not know about this or that trans girl's messages, or what was reblogged by whom. You have their allegiance, however -- tell your uncle, your grandfather, that you are hunting down secret child molesters online, and they will not condemn your aims. After all, it is rather like what they have been told, on facebook and television. What a fine member of the family you grew up to be.

Tell them you are hunting down predatory men who pretend to be women, and they will nod still, won't they? Tell them you are hunting down misandrist, man-hating feminists. Tell them you are hunting down faggots. Hunting down trannies. I hope you enjoy your company. For my part, I certainly enjoy mine.

Hey ralsei. Why did “lost girl” start playing when you got all sad

Avatar
girlsei

i have an answer that the general public.may not be ready to hear

man i sure do feel a certain way about homestuck beyond canon featuring explicit transmasc representation and joy front and center while transfemininity is relegated to metaphor and readings and teases of what's to come.

roxy gets to transition onscreen. davepeta is metaphorically transfem if you squint. vriska is implied to be trans in a spinoff visual novel and we barely fuckin do anything with that in the comic now that it's been established. there's the ever looming june egbert teases hanging over the whole thing but i honestly do not trust them to not fuck it up wholly and completely

always something to be referred to indirectly and through hushed whispers. talked around and never about. oh hey btw roxy finally stopped wearing the dysphoria hoodie yessss slay king!!!!

i'd say i'm happy for transmasc homestuck fans even if i wish the series would do better for transfems too, but no that'd be a lie. fuck you i'm smallminded and petty! this sucks and i'm not happy about any of it :D

fun how hs2 stopped running the first time in no small part due to an active harassment campaign against one of the transfems working on it. i wonder if things would still be this utterly shit if that had never happened lmao

basically i hope either in the next update we see vriska bulge and her doing her fucking shot of trollstrogen and like every omega kid is also doing estrogen OR i hope some fucking persona 4 shit happens to roxy. i am not kind or nice. i hope you suffer with me.

jade is a woman with a penis. thank god the epilogues heavily imply it wasn't always this way so we know she's atleast a CIS woman with a penis. BY THE WAY. ROXY LALONDE IS A TRANS GUY. STRAIGHT UP. NO FUCKING BONES ABOUT IT. WE SEE HIS TRANSITION JOURNEY ONSCREEN AND HOW HE AND OTHER PEOPLE FEEL ABOUT HIS GENDER IS SOMETHING THE STORY EXPLORES.

I am not holding out hope for official june egbert to be good. i do not think official june egbert is going to do a single thing to save any of this. this story has had plenty of opportunities to put transfemininity front and center in this way without her and it just never has. there have been so many missteps that if the story manages to handle this without making some *major* transmisogynistic pitfalls i will consider it a fucking miracle. I would be ecstatic to be proven wrong but there has not been a good foundation laid out for this at all.

believe me i would love nothing more than for the writers to make me look like an idiot for saying this, but as a human being with pattern recognition any time i've hoped for almost any kind of media not made explicitly by and for transfems to be good with transfem stuff, i've looked like an even bigger idiot.

it is really like this. is the thing.

this is not an issue becaus rape being Sexual means litterally nothing. sexual is not really any matter of coherent term. it is just a form of violence.

its not important or useful to qualify rape as Unique from other forms of violence because of more superficial elements like it being "sexual" which is not a coherent term.

like. the fact that like one man might want to rape a woman for "sexual" reasons (like for personal pleasure) doesnt change its character as violence, and here, as misogynistic violence. you have to observe things on a class perspective. what purpose and character does misogynistic rape (simply misogynistic violence) have? it maintains the position of men as enforcers of misogyny, and enforces the class position of women as people who perform feminized labor. like these things have economic motivations

[ID: weeabooexterminator: "rape is mostly an expression of power and abuse" being warped into "rape isn't sexual" or "rape isn't ever sexually motivated" is the most evil, distorted shit modern rape culture has produced. Just boldly turned it into a defense for the culture itself. End ID.]

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.