Quick TL;DR:
*Great book, fun, compelling plot, engrossing characters, not a lofty read, but a fun one, and well-written for it.
*NOT your typical vampire YA novel--this is meant as a "sequel" to the original Dracula, and touches on some of the same themes, although not in as literary a way
*It's a trilogy, but the third book isn't out yet, and you'll be dying for more when you finish each one--be warned!!;-)
When I first saw this book, I was a page at my local library in high school. Shelving books is a good way to discover new ones to read, and I picked this one up to read the back cover. My first thought was that this was another of those books getting in on the vampire trend in YA, and that turned me off. But reading the back cover, I discovered it actually was a "sequel" to the original Dracula by Bram Stoker; all of the main characters are the descendents of the original gang in the Victorian novel, and it's set during World War I. I had read Dracula for fun the summer before, and loved it, so...maybe this wouldn't be too bad? My interest was piqued. Hesitantly, I decided to read it during my lunch breaks.
I'm so glad I gave this book a chance! It's not high literature, and if you're expecting it to hold up to the original classic, you're expecting too much, but this IS NOT another one of the typical vampire novels that are flooding the YA market right now in the wake of Twilight. The story was compelling, the characters were engrossing, and Cary manages a feat only one other author has been consistently able to pull off in successfully misdirecting me and doing it in a fun way (the other was J K Rowling, so I think that says something).
I couldn't wait for the next one,and when we got a copy of the sequel, I devoured--pardon the pun--that too. The frustrating thing that still gets me about these books is that they're meant to be a trilogy, but Kate Cary is a ghostwriter for the Warriors books. Those are more lucrative, so guess which she spends most of her time on? I don't blame her, she has to make a living, but I've been waiting years for a third installment, and it's one of those books that, when you first finish it, you want to immediately start the next one, so even waiting for the library to get it from another branch is frustrating. If you start these books, beware of that:you'll be begging for more and won't get it fast enough! I follow Kate Cary on Facebook, and she says she's not working on the third installment right now, despite there being several very passionate of us fans begging her for another. Maybe the muse just hasn't struck her right--er, bitten?;-)
Corny vamire puns aside, here's my actual review. The plot is paced very well, and the characters, as I said, are very engrossing...and unlike some other YA books, they get to have character arcs! Mary starts off very idealistic, but her opinions change by the end of the second book. She's a pretty cool heroine; it's hard to write a novel set in Victorian times and have the character be appealing to modern audiences without pandering to modern-day tastes about how women should act, which would compromise realism. Mary's no wilting violet, and she's far more empowered than Bella Swann, but she's still a little prudish and idealistic, which is treated as part of her character, and a flaw at that. She's not a Mary Sue; all of the characters are well-defined. I found myself developing crushes on some of the male characters--heh heh!^__^;--which rarely happens for me. When I go developing crushes on fictional characters, it's because I find them compelling. The book switches between several of the characters as narrators in each chapter, which works effectively in this story to give the reader a more complete view of what's going on and a more complex development of each character--characters can disagree with each other or trick each other,and while we know who we want to root for, it makes the book a lot more fun.
The series touches on sexuality a little, as you have to in a follow up to Dracula, but it's not "teen smut", as some YA books get called. It's done tastefully and briefly, with some of the characters discussing their hesitancy toward sexuality, but also a secret curiosity about it--this is Victorian England, after all, nice young girls of marriageable age don't go thinking abut sex, they think of England!;-)
But it's done frankly--we know when a character has been seduced and is living with a man in a sexual relationship outside of marriage, but in case any parents are worried about it, the characters do express feelings that they're not doing the right thing...and usually die, which is kind of odd. But if you're worried about what your 15-year-old daughter will learn from these books, it's exemplary compared to Twilight.
I did have one complaint; the novel is set during World War I, or The Great War, as they were then calling it. Mary is a nurse helping at the hospital that is treating wounded soldiers coming back from the trenches, and she speaks with horror of the agony of some of the soldiers who are being treated; they have burns or amputated limbs, and worst of all, some have been subjected to mustard gas, and it's now painful for them to breathe. The soldiers are treated as individuals; Mary transcribes letters to sweethearts for some of them, or bonds with favorites, or watches them grow quiet when asked about their experiences. Cary does an interesting job of portraying the horror of The Great War, which was then a major traumatic event for all parties involved, to the point where people thought there could never be another war after the suffering they'd all inflicted on each other. She talks about soldiers suffering from "shell-shock" (what they called PTSD at the time), people at home losing loved ones overseas, and the darkness of the violence the soldiers encounter in the trenches as represented by the cruelty of Quincy Harker, who tells us that the bloodshed is perfect for complementing and disguising his vampiric tendencies. But Cary doesn't commit to it; it's not graphic in the violence at all like people accuse The Hunger Games of being, but the personalization of the participants and the humanization of victims is done fairly well. But where's the resulting message? Here's all this horror; great, now tell us what you want us to take away from it. You don't get that involved in showing the horror of war and then not give the reader a message about it. What's the lesson? A generic, "war is horrible", something about the darkness of humanity, or the nature of evil, perhaps? Is all this talk of how horrible the war is just there to add to the horror element of the book, or increase the feeling of evil? Then again, this is just meant to be a fun book, a light read; Cary's going for a beach novel type of thing, not a didactic, "I'm going to teach the young generation to make the world they inherit better!" attempt at literature like Rowling and Collins make. If you go into it with too high expectations, you'll set yourself up for the wrong experience and not enjoy the book. As a fun read, it's wonderful, and I hope Cary gets on the third installment!