TJ's Reviews > The Argonauts
The Argonauts
by
by
Here's what I liked: I liked the way Nelson writes about motherhood. Honest, unashamed, full of a joy with a hugeness to it. I've read some great writing on motherhood published recently (see: Eula Biss' On Immunity) and I deeply appreciate this work, as someone for whom the desire to birth and parent a child is very alien. I have been at times a little bratty in my attitudes towards those who chose to parent, so work that is critical of that attitude and helps demystify parenting feels invaluable to me.
That said, I really didn't care for Nelson's... methodology. She's trying to write in a way that mirrors the messiness of thought, the messiness of processes of learning and growing. Maybe it was unavoidable that this would leave me cringing frequently, but, I don't know, maybe it wasn't? In any case, it was at times really painful. Like, when Nelson describes the sense of mourning she felt as she learned that her baby was a "boy," her mourning for "the fantasy of a feminist daughter, the fantasy of a mini-me." She takes us through the process of accepting the body her baby would be born with, but disappointingly this acceptance does not come at the realization of how very wrong the act of gendering a fetus is; instead it comes when she realizes that she might still "braid his hair!" She tells us about how she felt "surprised" that her body could "make a male body." It's bizarre that someone with a trans spouse could be so oblivious to her own essentializing of her child's gender.
Another example: Nelson briefly takes her reader through her decision to give her child a name of Native American origin. To paraphrase, it goes like this: "Would it be weird for us, as white parents, to give our white child a native name? Probably, but I think we'll do it anyway. And oh! a 'full tribe member' gave us her blessing!" Like...
This review is turning out to be longer than I meant it to be. I guess it feels as if Nelson in this work was grasping at a way of writing that cuts to some authentic and fleeting affect -- but too often it feels like she's gliding over the surface of things, trying to keep up a momentum, trying not to lose something. And some other thing IS being lost. There's not always enough self-reflection, and I just don't know what, really, many of her readers will get out of these moments. She would have done well to step back a little and ask herself what she was really offering us.
That said, I really didn't care for Nelson's... methodology. She's trying to write in a way that mirrors the messiness of thought, the messiness of processes of learning and growing. Maybe it was unavoidable that this would leave me cringing frequently, but, I don't know, maybe it wasn't? In any case, it was at times really painful. Like, when Nelson describes the sense of mourning she felt as she learned that her baby was a "boy," her mourning for "the fantasy of a feminist daughter, the fantasy of a mini-me." She takes us through the process of accepting the body her baby would be born with, but disappointingly this acceptance does not come at the realization of how very wrong the act of gendering a fetus is; instead it comes when she realizes that she might still "braid his hair!" She tells us about how she felt "surprised" that her body could "make a male body." It's bizarre that someone with a trans spouse could be so oblivious to her own essentializing of her child's gender.
Another example: Nelson briefly takes her reader through her decision to give her child a name of Native American origin. To paraphrase, it goes like this: "Would it be weird for us, as white parents, to give our white child a native name? Probably, but I think we'll do it anyway. And oh! a 'full tribe member' gave us her blessing!" Like...
This review is turning out to be longer than I meant it to be. I guess it feels as if Nelson in this work was grasping at a way of writing that cuts to some authentic and fleeting affect -- but too often it feels like she's gliding over the surface of things, trying to keep up a momentum, trying not to lose something. And some other thing IS being lost. There's not always enough self-reflection, and I just don't know what, really, many of her readers will get out of these moments. She would have done well to step back a little and ask herself what she was really offering us.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Argonauts.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Brett
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jul 15, 2015 03:41AM
This is an interesting corrective to certain passages within Nelson's text, certain glosses where more insight is wanted. However, to me it seems really unfortunate to ignore the many, many passages (most) in which her introspection and self-awareness and struggle was present, obvious, and resolution was attempted through compromise and a courage to leave hard truths ambiguous and fraught with contradiction. In a way, the book is one side of a conversation and I imagine she'd nod in appreciation of some of the points you made in this review. This spirit comes through in the text and its to her credit. A 2 star review seems reactionary.
reply
|
flag
Y I K E S. Thrilled that I opted to put it down today. I was really turned off by how academic it was while also being ambiguous and hard-to-follow. dull dull dull. also how do you not know the preferred pronoun of the person your boning, like really?
Google, Maggie, really?
On gendering children, I think the point still stands given there’s a decent chance a child will identify with their embodied/assigned gender after all. Like, don’t take it as given, but recognize it’s a fairly likely outcome and prepare for that possibility, neh? It feels somewhere between misguided and abusive to me to completely deny gender to children, not without introducing some body-shaming, disassociation, or writing off huge swathes of culture as inaccessible/evil/irredeemable. I think, for all that one can try to provide gender neutral parenting/caregiving, it’s a tough road given how gendered society is. I think kids should be allowed and encouraged to try on gender, if only to understand it well enough to understand others to whom it does apply.Anyway, it’s tougher for parents and loved ones when there’s less overlap in lived experience. AFABs and AMABs generally have different journeys depending on what roles/expectations are enforced on them, and compound that with all the culture baggage of cis male status… I could see these things stirring up some ugly, unfair, but also necessary emotional processing for queer/afab parents with an amab child.





