Carmen's Reviews > The War of the Worlds
The War of the Worlds
by
by
Carmen's review
bookshelves: british-author, published1898, fiction, he-says, read-around-the-world-2018, science-fiction, traditionally-published, horror, classics
Feb 01, 2018
bookshelves: british-author, published1898, fiction, he-says, read-around-the-world-2018, science-fiction, traditionally-published, horror, classics
No one would have believed in the last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man's and yet as mortal as our own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite complacency men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over matter. It is possible that the infusoria under the microscope do the same. No one gave a thought to the older worlds of space as sources of human danger, or thought of them only to dismiss the idea of life upon them as impossible or improbable. It is curious to recall some of the mental habits of those departed days. At most, terrestrial men fancied there might be other men upon Mars, perhaps inferior to themselves and ready to welcome a missionary enterprise. Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us. And early in the twentieth century came the great disillusionment.
Hmmmmm, how fucking amazing is this? Actually, the whole first chapter of this book, titled, "THE EVE OF WAR" is pretty amazing. Very enjoyable. The book loses something when it adopts our MC telling us about his experiences during the invasion, but Wells rescues himself with some breathtaking breakdowns of morality, ethics, war horrors, and survival. Not to mention class differences.
Wells is also, like Faber in Under the Skin, using aliens and science fiction to push a vegan agenda.
"You can't be serious, Carmen. H.G. Wells was not pushing a vegan agenda."
CARMEN: *sips coffee*
*looks at you*
Oh, yes, he absolutely was, and vegans of today who are interested in reading works of fiction which promote vegan lifestyles can enjoy both this book and Faber's book and perhaps incorporate them into a vegan book club. I mean, surely vegans must get tired of what can sometimes be self-righteous and pompous propaganda which exists in vegan non-fiction. Not to mention it is often fucking depressing, especially the books that talk about the suffering of animals in graphic detail. Even if something like veganism was not popular in Wells time and place, you can easily see how this is a vegan book.
The book makes some (what must be at the time: earthshattering) conclusions about humankind. This is a book like The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde which, when you read it now, it seems like old hat, but in its day must have just blown people away with its radical concepts.
Imagine humans NOT being the masters of all they survey. Imagine humans encountering beings smarter, stronger, and more ruthless then themselves, which see humans simply as ants, cockroaches, or rabbits - to be exterminated and/or eaten. That's what we are dealing with here, and it cannot be denied that Wells revolutionized and charged the genre of science-fiction much the way Mary Shelley did with her revolutionary, mind-blowing Frankenstein.
A lot of people read FRANKENSTEIN today and are disappointed. It's so old-fashioned. It's nothing like the media trained you to think it was. It's slow, it's old. You might read WAR OF THE WORLDS or DRACULA or DR. JEKYLL and feel the same way. But you have to understand that at the time, these authors were completely slaying people's long-held beliefs and way of thinking. Some of the old sci-fi/horror classics hold up, and some don't. DR. JEKYLL is particularly weak IMO, but DRACULA and FRANKENSTEIN hold up very well (IMO). I loved both and think they are still very arresting and relevant today.
So how does WAR OF THE WORLDS hold up? Amazing first chapter that blows you out of the water.
And we men, the creatures who inhabit this earth, must be to them at least as alien and lowly as are the monkeys and lemurs to us. The intellectual side of man already admits that life is an incessant struggle for existence, and it would seem that this too is the belief of the minds upon Mars. Their world is far gone in its cooling and this world is still crowded with life, but crowded only with what they regard as inferior animals. To carry warfare sunward is, indeed, their only escape from the destruction that, generation after generation, creeps upon them.
And before we judge them too harshly we must remember what ruthless and utter destruction our own species has wrought, not only upon animals, such as the vanished bison and the dodo, but upon its inferior races.
Think of everything humanity does to animals, and the genocide, war, and slavery it inflicts on other human beings. Wells keeps bringing this up throughout the novel in a rare show of clear-eyed thinking about humanity, especially for an Englishman in 1898.
Now, the book loses something when we start following our MC around and experiencing the invasion with him. But the book saves itself in a few ways.
One, Wells's writing.
Few people realise the immensity of vacancy in which the dust of the material universe swims.
...
Those who have never seen a living Martian can scarcely imagine the strange horror of its appearance.
He's got a lot of good writing in this book and some great turns of phrase.
Secondly, he decides not only to take down humanity's vanity and confidence, but also seeks to offer commentary on religion, class differences, and morality and ethics especially in the context of war. It's staggering how much he chooses to bite off here, but such takedowns engage the reader throughout the book.
He also doesn't skimp on the horror - not only the horrors and ravages of war, but the horror of the aliens and what they do to humans. It's honestly terrifying and Wells successfully scared me and made me disgusted.
I think he made his MC deliberately a member of the intelligentsia instead of a soldier, because - let me tell you - this book would have been completely different if told from the POV of someone who was a combat veteran. And that's on purpose. As the soldier he meets points out to him, after you've seen some shit then shit isn't as shocking.
"I saw what was up. Most of the people were hard at it, squealing and exciting themselves. But I'm not so fond of squealing. I've been in sight of death once or twice; I'm not an ornamental soldier, and at the best and worst, death - it's just death. And it's the man that keeps on thinking comes through."
The way Wells wraps up the book, the way he brings everything to a close, is also fucking brilliant. It may seem cliched or old hat NOW, but you have to realize it was mindblowing back then. Much like the concept of Jekyll/Hyde.
Now. I'm not saying that just because a book has cultural relevance and significance and is a classic in its genre that it's automatically good. Because I don't believe in that shit. Instead, I found myself actually enjoying and liking this book. That doesn't happen to me with every classic. Not every classic holds up. But classics that I enjoy and hold up for me (P&P, S&S, Frankenstein, Dracula, and Jane Eyre) don't please EVERYONE. I understand that old-fashioned books, language, and plotting can be boring and stupid to modern readers. And there are classics that come off that way to me, as well. So YMMV. I've certainly read classics that I've absolutely hated, and this might be one of those for you as well.
While reading this book it seemed achingly familiar to me. I think I've probably read this before. Maybe a decade ago or so, I don't know. It's also possible that this book is SO entrenched in pop culture that I just thought I'd read it, but I don't think so. But I'm going to list it here as my first reading since I can't specifically remember reading it before.
I like Wells's points here.
- His pushing of a vegan agenda; extraordinary for a man of his time.
- His takedown of religion and interpretation of God and what God entails. Not atheist, but a super interesting viewpoint of his time, cackling that 'God is not an insurance agent' and surmising that it's equally likely that humanity's new Martian masters also pray to God and expect God's protection.
- His portrayal as a curate (clergy) as a weak, spineless, helpless and selfish individual.
- His takedown and analysis of class differences, especially when the MC gets into a discussion with a soldier about humanity's future.
- His discussion of the horrors of war - not only what the enemy is inflicting upon you, but what war's victims end up doing to each other. His analysis of the terrible things people find themselves doing to survive, and if that can be forgiven or not when normality is restored.
Those who have escaped the dark and terrible aspects of life will find my brutality, my flash of rage in our final tragedy, easy enough to blame; for they know what is wrong as well as any, but not what is possible to tortured men. But those who have been under the shadow, who have gone down at last to elemental things, will have a wider charity.
I mean, take your pick, he just slays here with his cultural and social commentary. I find him lacking and tone-deaf on the plight of women, but I can't have everything. At least not from this author. >.< LOL
TL;DR - Hmmmmmmmm. Reading the sci-fi and horror classics can be very illuminating and oftentimes rewarding. That was the case here. Even though I don't think this book is a strong structurally as FRANKENSTEIN or DRACULA (the plot meanders a bit), Wells certainly hammers home not only his revolutionary and life-changing ideas, but puts forth some true literary gems.
Although it isn't perfect, I am still giving it five stars. With some caveats.
Also, I want to restate that this won't be for everyone.
Strange night! Strangest in this, that so soon as dawn had come, I, who had talked with God, crept out of the house like a rat leaving its hiding place - a creature scarcely larger, an inferior animal, a thing that for any passing whim of our masters might be hunted and killed. Perhaps they also prayed confidently to God. Surely, if we have learned nothing else, this war has taught us pity - pity for those witless souls that suffer our dominion.
Read with Non-Crunchy Cool Classic Pantaloonless Buddy Read group, February 2018
Hmmmmm, how fucking amazing is this? Actually, the whole first chapter of this book, titled, "THE EVE OF WAR" is pretty amazing. Very enjoyable. The book loses something when it adopts our MC telling us about his experiences during the invasion, but Wells rescues himself with some breathtaking breakdowns of morality, ethics, war horrors, and survival. Not to mention class differences.
Wells is also, like Faber in Under the Skin, using aliens and science fiction to push a vegan agenda.
"You can't be serious, Carmen. H.G. Wells was not pushing a vegan agenda."
CARMEN: *sips coffee*
*looks at you*
Oh, yes, he absolutely was, and vegans of today who are interested in reading works of fiction which promote vegan lifestyles can enjoy both this book and Faber's book and perhaps incorporate them into a vegan book club. I mean, surely vegans must get tired of what can sometimes be self-righteous and pompous propaganda which exists in vegan non-fiction. Not to mention it is often fucking depressing, especially the books that talk about the suffering of animals in graphic detail. Even if something like veganism was not popular in Wells time and place, you can easily see how this is a vegan book.
The book makes some (what must be at the time: earthshattering) conclusions about humankind. This is a book like The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde which, when you read it now, it seems like old hat, but in its day must have just blown people away with its radical concepts.
Imagine humans NOT being the masters of all they survey. Imagine humans encountering beings smarter, stronger, and more ruthless then themselves, which see humans simply as ants, cockroaches, or rabbits - to be exterminated and/or eaten. That's what we are dealing with here, and it cannot be denied that Wells revolutionized and charged the genre of science-fiction much the way Mary Shelley did with her revolutionary, mind-blowing Frankenstein.
A lot of people read FRANKENSTEIN today and are disappointed. It's so old-fashioned. It's nothing like the media trained you to think it was. It's slow, it's old. You might read WAR OF THE WORLDS or DRACULA or DR. JEKYLL and feel the same way. But you have to understand that at the time, these authors were completely slaying people's long-held beliefs and way of thinking. Some of the old sci-fi/horror classics hold up, and some don't. DR. JEKYLL is particularly weak IMO, but DRACULA and FRANKENSTEIN hold up very well (IMO). I loved both and think they are still very arresting and relevant today.
So how does WAR OF THE WORLDS hold up? Amazing first chapter that blows you out of the water.
And we men, the creatures who inhabit this earth, must be to them at least as alien and lowly as are the monkeys and lemurs to us. The intellectual side of man already admits that life is an incessant struggle for existence, and it would seem that this too is the belief of the minds upon Mars. Their world is far gone in its cooling and this world is still crowded with life, but crowded only with what they regard as inferior animals. To carry warfare sunward is, indeed, their only escape from the destruction that, generation after generation, creeps upon them.
And before we judge them too harshly we must remember what ruthless and utter destruction our own species has wrought, not only upon animals, such as the vanished bison and the dodo, but upon its inferior races.
Think of everything humanity does to animals, and the genocide, war, and slavery it inflicts on other human beings. Wells keeps bringing this up throughout the novel in a rare show of clear-eyed thinking about humanity, especially for an Englishman in 1898.
Now, the book loses something when we start following our MC around and experiencing the invasion with him. But the book saves itself in a few ways.
One, Wells's writing.
Few people realise the immensity of vacancy in which the dust of the material universe swims.
...
Those who have never seen a living Martian can scarcely imagine the strange horror of its appearance.
He's got a lot of good writing in this book and some great turns of phrase.
Secondly, he decides not only to take down humanity's vanity and confidence, but also seeks to offer commentary on religion, class differences, and morality and ethics especially in the context of war. It's staggering how much he chooses to bite off here, but such takedowns engage the reader throughout the book.
He also doesn't skimp on the horror - not only the horrors and ravages of war, but the horror of the aliens and what they do to humans. It's honestly terrifying and Wells successfully scared me and made me disgusted.
I think he made his MC deliberately a member of the intelligentsia instead of a soldier, because - let me tell you - this book would have been completely different if told from the POV of someone who was a combat veteran. And that's on purpose. As the soldier he meets points out to him, after you've seen some shit then shit isn't as shocking.
"I saw what was up. Most of the people were hard at it, squealing and exciting themselves. But I'm not so fond of squealing. I've been in sight of death once or twice; I'm not an ornamental soldier, and at the best and worst, death - it's just death. And it's the man that keeps on thinking comes through."
The way Wells wraps up the book, the way he brings everything to a close, is also fucking brilliant. It may seem cliched or old hat NOW, but you have to realize it was mindblowing back then. Much like the concept of Jekyll/Hyde.
Now. I'm not saying that just because a book has cultural relevance and significance and is a classic in its genre that it's automatically good. Because I don't believe in that shit. Instead, I found myself actually enjoying and liking this book. That doesn't happen to me with every classic. Not every classic holds up. But classics that I enjoy and hold up for me (P&P, S&S, Frankenstein, Dracula, and Jane Eyre) don't please EVERYONE. I understand that old-fashioned books, language, and plotting can be boring and stupid to modern readers. And there are classics that come off that way to me, as well. So YMMV. I've certainly read classics that I've absolutely hated, and this might be one of those for you as well.
While reading this book it seemed achingly familiar to me. I think I've probably read this before. Maybe a decade ago or so, I don't know. It's also possible that this book is SO entrenched in pop culture that I just thought I'd read it, but I don't think so. But I'm going to list it here as my first reading since I can't specifically remember reading it before.
I like Wells's points here.
- His pushing of a vegan agenda; extraordinary for a man of his time.
- His takedown of religion and interpretation of God and what God entails. Not atheist, but a super interesting viewpoint of his time, cackling that 'God is not an insurance agent' and surmising that it's equally likely that humanity's new Martian masters also pray to God and expect God's protection.
- His portrayal as a curate (clergy) as a weak, spineless, helpless and selfish individual.
- His takedown and analysis of class differences, especially when the MC gets into a discussion with a soldier about humanity's future.
- His discussion of the horrors of war - not only what the enemy is inflicting upon you, but what war's victims end up doing to each other. His analysis of the terrible things people find themselves doing to survive, and if that can be forgiven or not when normality is restored.
Those who have escaped the dark and terrible aspects of life will find my brutality, my flash of rage in our final tragedy, easy enough to blame; for they know what is wrong as well as any, but not what is possible to tortured men. But those who have been under the shadow, who have gone down at last to elemental things, will have a wider charity.
I mean, take your pick, he just slays here with his cultural and social commentary. I find him lacking and tone-deaf on the plight of women, but I can't have everything. At least not from this author. >.< LOL
TL;DR - Hmmmmmmmm. Reading the sci-fi and horror classics can be very illuminating and oftentimes rewarding. That was the case here. Even though I don't think this book is a strong structurally as FRANKENSTEIN or DRACULA (the plot meanders a bit), Wells certainly hammers home not only his revolutionary and life-changing ideas, but puts forth some true literary gems.
Although it isn't perfect, I am still giving it five stars. With some caveats.
Also, I want to restate that this won't be for everyone.
Strange night! Strangest in this, that so soon as dawn had come, I, who had talked with God, crept out of the house like a rat leaving its hiding place - a creature scarcely larger, an inferior animal, a thing that for any passing whim of our masters might be hunted and killed. Perhaps they also prayed confidently to God. Surely, if we have learned nothing else, this war has taught us pity - pity for those witless souls that suffer our dominion.
Read with Non-Crunchy Cool Classic Pantaloonless Buddy Read group, February 2018
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The War of the Worlds.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 14, 2015
– Shelved
(Other Paperback Edition)
February 1, 2018
–
Started Reading
February 1, 2018
– Shelved
February 1, 2018
–
0.52%
"No one would have believed in the last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man's and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of"
page
1
February 1, 2018
–
1.04%
"With infinite complacency men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over matter. It is possible that the infusoria under the microscope do the same. No one gave a thought to the older worlds of space as sources of human danger, or thought of them only to dismiss the idea of life upon them as impossible or improbable."
page
2
February 1, 2018
–
1.56%
"Yet so vain is man, and so blinded by his vanity, that no writer, up to the very end of the nineteenth century, expressed any idea that intelligent life might have developed there far, or indeed at all, beyond its earthly level."
page
3
February 1, 2018
–
2.08%
"And looking across space with instruments, and intelligences such as we have scarcely dreamed of, they see, at its nearest distance only 35,000,000 of miles sunward of them, a morning star of hope, our own warmer planet, green with vegetation and grey with water, with a cloudy atmosphere eloquent of fertility, with glimpses through its drifting cloud wisps of broad stretches of populous country and narrow, navy-"
page
4
February 1, 2018
–
2.6%
"And we men, the creatures who inhabit this earth, must be to them at least as alien and lowly as are the monkeys and lemurs to us. The intellectual side of man already admits that life is an incessant struggle for existence, and it would seem that this too is the belief of the minds upon Mars. Their world is far gone in its cooling and this world is still crowded with life, but crowded only with what they regard"
page
5
February 1, 2018
–
3.13%
"And before we judge them too harshly we must remember what ruthless and utter destruction our own species has wrought, not only upon animals, such as the vanished bison and the dodo, but upon its inferior races. The Tasmanians, in spite of their human likeness, were entirely swept out of existence in a war of extermination waged by European immigrants, in the space of fifty years. Are we such apostles of mercy as"
page
6
February 1, 2018
–
3.65%
"Few people realise the immensity of vacancy in which the dust of the material universe swims."
page
7
February 2, 2018
–
4.17%
"The crowd about the pit had increased, and stood out black against the lemon yellow of the sky - a couple hundred people, perhaps.
13%"
page
8
13%"
February 2, 2018
–
4.69%
"Those who have never seen a living Martian can scarcely imagine the strange horror of its appearance.
14%"
page
9
14%"
February 2, 2018
–
5.21%
"The Martians took as much notice of such advances as we should of the lowing of a cow.
23%"
page
10
23%"
February 2, 2018
–
5.73%
""Death!" I shouted. "Death is coming! Death!" and leaving him to digest that if he could, I hurried on after the artilleryman."
page
11
February 2, 2018
–
6.25%
"But the Martian machine took no more notice for the moment of the people running this way and that than a man would of the confusion of ants in a nest against which his foot has kicked.
35%"
page
12
35%"
February 2, 2018
–
6.77%
""Be a man!" said I. "You are scared out of your wits! What good is religion if it collapses under calamity? Think of what earthquakes and floods, wars and volcanoes, have done before to men! Did you think God had exempted Weybridge? He is not an insurance agent."
39%"
page
13
39%"
February 2, 2018
–
9.9%
"She seemed, poor woman, to imagine that the French and the Martians might prove very similar.
58%"
page
19
58%"
February 2, 2018
–
10.42%
"I think it's funny how our MC locks himself in a box room to escape the curate and his 'selfish despair.' :D 61%"
page
20
February 2, 2018
–
11.46%
"They did not eat, much less digest. Instead, they took the fresh, living blood of other creatures, and INJECTED it into their own veins. I have myself seen this being done, as I shall mention in its place.
66%"
page
22
66%"
February 2, 2018
–
11.98%
"The bare idea of this is no doubt horribly repulsive to us, but at the same time I think that we should remember how repulsive our carnivorous habits would seem to an intelligent rabbit.
66%"
page
23
66%"
February 2, 2018
–
12.5%
"In twenty-four hours they did twenty-four hours of work, as even on earth is perhaps the case with the ants.
67%"
page
24
67%"
February 2, 2018
–
13.54%
"Those who have escaped the dark and terrible aspects of life will find my brutality, my flash of rage in our final tragedy, easy enough to blame; for they know what is wrong as well as any, but not what is possible to tortured men. But those who have been under the shadow, who have gone down at last to elemental things, will have a wider charity.
70% Accurate."
page
26
70% Accurate."
February 2, 2018
–
14.06%
"For that moment I touched an emotion beyond the common range of men, yet one that the poor brutes we dominate know only too well. I felt as a rabbit might feel returning to his burrow and suddenly confronted by the work of a dozen busy navvies digging the foundations of a house. I felt the first inkling of a thing that presently grew quite clear in my mind, that oppressed me for many days, a sense of dethronement,"
page
27
February 2, 2018
–
14.58%
"MC just eats some mushrooms he's found, that may not be the best idea.
76%"
page
28
76%"
February 2, 2018
–
15.1%
"MC tries to eat red Martian weed. Starting to worry about him.
76%"
page
29
76%"
February 2, 2018
–
15.63%
"Three things struggled for possession of my mind: the killing of the curate, the whereabouts of the Martians, and the possible fate of my wife.
77%"
page
30
77%"
February 2, 2018
–
16.67%
"But I did not foresee; and crime is to foresee and do. And I set this down as I have set all this story down, as it was. There were no witnesses - all these things I might have concealed. But I set it down, and the reader must form his judgment as he will.
Excellent, 78%"
page
32
Excellent, 78%"
February 2, 2018
–
17.19%
"Strange night! Strangest in this, that so soon as dawn had come, I, who had talked with God, crept out of the house like a rat leaving its hiding place - a creature scarcely larger, an inferior animal, a thing that for any passing whim of our masters might be hunted and killed. Perhaps they also prayed confidently to God. Surely, if we have learned nothing else, this war has taught us pity - pity for those witless"
page
33
February 2, 2018
–
17.71%
""This isn't a war," said the artilleryman. "It never was a war, any more than there's a war between man and ants."
80%"
page
34
80%"
February 2, 2018
–
18.23%
""I saw what was up."
I LOVE how they used this expression in the 1800s and it is still widely used today. Tickles me pink. I'm always finding it in old books.
80%"
page
35
I LOVE how they used this expression in the 1800s and it is still widely used today. Tickles me pink. I'm always finding it in old books.
80%"
February 2, 2018
–
18.75%
""I saw what was up. Most of the people were hard at it, squealing and exciting themselves. But I'm not so fond of squealing. I've been in sight of death once or twice; I'm not an ornamental soldier, and at the best and worst, death - it's just death. And it's the man that keeps on thinking comes through."
80%"
page
36
80%"
February 2, 2018
–
18.23%
""Cities, nations, civilisation, progress - it's all over. That game's up. We're beat."
"But if that is so, what is there to live for?"
The artilleryman looked at me for a moment.
"There won't be any more blessed concerts for a million years or so; there won't be any Royal Academy of Arts, and no nice little feeds at restaurants. If it's amusement you're after, I reckon the game is up. If you've any drawing-room"
page
35
"But if that is so, what is there to live for?"
The artilleryman looked at me for a moment.
"There won't be any more blessed concerts for a million years or so; there won't be any Royal Academy of Arts, and no nice little feeds at restaurants. If it's amusement you're after, I reckon the game is up. If you've any drawing-room"
February 2, 2018
–
18.75%
"I sat contemplating these things. I could find nothing to bring against this man's reasoning. In the days before the invasion no one would have questioned my intellectual superiority to his - I, a professed and recognised writer on philosophical themes, and he, a common soldier; and yet he had already formulated a situation that I had scarcely realised.
82%"
page
36
82%"
February 2, 2018
–
19.79%
"For a moment I believed that the destruction of Sennacherib had been repeated, that God had repented, that the Angel of Death had slain them in the night.
89%"
page
38
89%"
February 2, 2018
–
20.83%
"Wells really likes the word 'multitudinous,' that's for sure.
89%"
page
40
89%"
February 2, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Lisa
(new)
-
added it
Feb 02, 2018 06:19PM
Okay, I'm intrigued enough to add it. Thanks, Carmen. Great review.
reply
|
flag
Lisa wrote: "Okay, I'm intrigued enough to add it. Thanks, Carmen. Great review."You are very welcome, Lisa Vegan! I knew you'd be intrigued. And it's a classic, anyway. A good book to have under your belt. Not to mention it is pretty short. Probably free on Gutenberg?
Carmen, and my library will definitely have it. And I like speculative fiction, sometimes. I do have a (vegan) book group and we might have it on our interested list. We mostly read books having nothing to do with veganism and not everyone is a huge fan of sf but most are.
Carmen, and my library will definitely have it. And I like speculative fiction, sometimes. I do have a (vegan) book group and we might have it on our interested list. We mostly read books having nothing to do with veganism and not everyone is a huge fan of sf but most are. Yay! Well, I hope you enjoy it. :) Did you like my excerpts? That will give you an idea of the writing. Some people have a hard time with older books.
Carmen wrote: "Yay! Well, I hope you enjoy it. :) Did you like my excerpts? That will give you an idea of the writing. Some people have a hard time with older books."Not my favorite style, but I can read it, and enjoy it if I'm enjoying the story.
Amazing review, Carmen, and a great analysis! I’m glad you enjoyed this book when reading it with your group. :)
Donna wrote: "Amazing review, Carmen, and a great analysis! I’m glad you enjoyed this book when reading it with your group. :)"Thank you so much, Donna! It was actually a pretty good book. :)
Great review, Carmen. The coffee sipping seems to bring out the writer in you, lol! ;-)
Lisa A ⛄ wrote: "Great review, Carmen. The coffee sipping seems to bring out the writer in you, lol! ;-)"LOL Thanks, Lisa A! Need some caffeine to jump start my brain, LOL.
Your review has utterly convinced me that I need to read this! I also re-read Frankenstein recently and I agree it's really interesting looking back on these sci-fi/horror classics. I understand when people say they are disappointed because they feel so old-fashioned but I think that adds to their charm and it's incredible when you think how few possible influences the writers could have drawn on when writing them. Fantastic review, Carmen, once again.
Your review has utterly convinced me that I need to read this! I also re-read Frankenstein recently and I agree it's really interesting looking back on these sci-fi/horror classics. I understand when people say they are disappointed because they feel so old-fashioned but I think that adds to their charm and it's incredible when you think how few possible influences the writers could have drawn on when writing them. Fantastic review, Carmen, once again. Thank you so much, Imi. I hope you enjoy it. It is quite the little gem. :)
Enthralling review, Carmen. I recall being very fond of this novel, particularly Wells' language and perspective, but not finding as much value as you did. Your thoughts on classic fiction and how difficult it is to relate to--particularly after a century of films and ripoffs strip mining them--was very astute. I'll take your recommendation not to give up on Frankenstein and Dracula. I couldn't last more than three pages of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Great book report.
Enthralling review, Carmen. I recall being very fond of this novel, particularly Wells' language and perspective, but not finding as much value as you did. Your thoughts on classic fiction and how difficult it is to relate to--particularly after a century of films and ripoffs strip mining them--was very astute. I'll take your recommendation not to give up on Frankenstein and Dracula. I couldn't last more than three pages of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Great book report. Joseph, yes, I'm writing a review of Dr. Jekyll right now. It's definitely not as accessible as some of the other classics. I don't blame you for giving up after three pages. The beginning especially is a slog. Yes, I read your review of WAR OF THE WORLDS and enjoyed it. If you do end up giving FRANKENSTEIN or DRACULA a shot, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Thank you.
- Carmen
One of those classics you think you've read - but then realise you haven't. Great review Carmen because it really makes me want to read it.
Richard wrote: "One of those classics you think you've read - but then realise you haven't. Great review Carmen because it really makes me want to read it."Thank you so much, Richard! I hope you enjoy it if you do pick it up. :)
I'm still considering reading this book, so I'll have to hold off on reading your review, but those five stars are encouraging.
Ɗắɳ 2.☊ wrote: "I'm still considering reading this book, so I'll have to hold off on reading your review, but those five stars are encouraging."Oh, yes, I found it to be enjoyable, Dan. If you do end up reading it, I'd be interested in your thoughts, of course. :)
This was one of the earliest classics that I remember reading in my boyhood and I was bowled over by just how real and utterly unsettling the terror of an invasion felt in the book. Wells was obviously drawing metaphors between the Martians and the imperialism present in that age but even without that brilliant subtext, this was a punchy, potent science fiction thriller that would put most of today's science-fiction authors to shame. And of course, once again, your review does ample justice to the same. In most science fiction novels, we end up missing the prose in favor of the concepts and ideas. But Wells was one writer who took as much care of his prose as much as of his ideas. And your review, with those excerpts, and your candid comments on them, is just perfect to remind us that.
This was one of the earliest classics that I remember reading in my boyhood and I was bowled over by just how real and utterly unsettling the terror of an invasion felt in the book. Wells was obviously drawing metaphors between the Martians and the imperialism present in that age but even without that brilliant subtext, this was a punchy, potent science fiction thriller that would put most of today's science-fiction authors to shame. And of course, once again, your review does ample justice to the same. In most science fiction novels, we end up missing the prose in favor of the concepts and ideas. But Wells was one writer who took as much care of his prose as much as of his ideas. And your review, with those excerpts, and your candid comments on them, is just perfect to remind us that.
Thank you so much, Zoeb.




