Zoe Carney's Reviews > My Policeman
My Policeman
by
by
Edit October 2022: wow, lots of people found this review, huh? I haven't replied individually because tbh, it's more than 8 years since I read the book and my memories of it are sketchy, although I do remember wanting to throw it across the room. If you loved it, that's great! I'm happy for you :) I'll bet there's other stuff that I've read and loved that you hated. Maybe the film will make me feel differently, or maybe not. Either way, I stand by my review.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was both fascinated and immensely annoyed by this book. The blurb describes it as a tragic love story, of a man and a woman both in love with the same man in a time (the 1950s) when it is safer for him to marry the woman and maintain a front of respectability. As a longtime reader of LGBT fiction, it sounded like exactly the sort of book I would love.
I didn't. In the spirit of fairness, I should list its good points: 1950s Brighton is beautifully vivid, and the prevailing attitudes of the time are well-captured. Patrick and his mother are wonderful characters, Julia (a relatively minor character, yet an important one) is great, and the relationship between Tom and Patrick feels era-appropriately dangerous.
However, Marion - the main protagonist - is an out and out bitch. I don't use that word lightly, but honestly, I don't think I've hated a female character this much since Mary-Anne in the Tales of the City series. I think we're supposed to empathise with her plight - she's young and unworldly, living in a time when homosexuality just wasn't talked about, so when she announces that she's in love with Tom and is warned by his sister, no less, that he's 'not like that' she's naively (or willfully) unaware of what that means.
I wanted to punch her then, and I didn't shift much on that opinion throughout the rest of the book. If anything, my loathing deepened as it became clear exactly what she'd done to dispose of her opposition. She loses a good fried - Julia - in her refusal to accept her husband's 'perversions', loses her husband his career, and destroys Patrick's life. And all so she can 'win' Tom, a plot which (thankfully) backfires spectacularly, leading to a loveless, sexless, forty year marriage. (What is never made clear is why Tom would choose to stay with this awful human being in later years when divorce and homosexuality both became more socially acceptable. Another big failing from my perspective is that Marion's point of view is so dominant, there isn't room for Tom to speak for himself.)
The ending is heartbreaking. Marion finally does the right thing and tells Tom and the ailing Patrick what she did, and true to form, disappears to leave them to deal with it. I was so angry with her by this point that I didn't even care that the ending was a bit cliched and unnecessarily dramatic.
In short, this isn't a gay romance, nor an exploration of the difficulties of maintaining a public face and an illegal private love. It's a straight woman's vision of those things, written for other straight women, and as I don't fall into that category I found it incredibly insulting and annoying. In the hands of a different writer I believe it could have been far more sensitively handled, and Marion could have even become less loathsome. As it is, for all its good points, it remains horrible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was both fascinated and immensely annoyed by this book. The blurb describes it as a tragic love story, of a man and a woman both in love with the same man in a time (the 1950s) when it is safer for him to marry the woman and maintain a front of respectability. As a longtime reader of LGBT fiction, it sounded like exactly the sort of book I would love.
I didn't. In the spirit of fairness, I should list its good points: 1950s Brighton is beautifully vivid, and the prevailing attitudes of the time are well-captured. Patrick and his mother are wonderful characters, Julia (a relatively minor character, yet an important one) is great, and the relationship between Tom and Patrick feels era-appropriately dangerous.
However, Marion - the main protagonist - is an out and out bitch. I don't use that word lightly, but honestly, I don't think I've hated a female character this much since Mary-Anne in the Tales of the City series. I think we're supposed to empathise with her plight - she's young and unworldly, living in a time when homosexuality just wasn't talked about, so when she announces that she's in love with Tom and is warned by his sister, no less, that he's 'not like that' she's naively (or willfully) unaware of what that means.
I wanted to punch her then, and I didn't shift much on that opinion throughout the rest of the book. If anything, my loathing deepened as it became clear exactly what she'd done to dispose of her opposition. She loses a good fried - Julia - in her refusal to accept her husband's 'perversions', loses her husband his career, and destroys Patrick's life. And all so she can 'win' Tom, a plot which (thankfully) backfires spectacularly, leading to a loveless, sexless, forty year marriage. (What is never made clear is why Tom would choose to stay with this awful human being in later years when divorce and homosexuality both became more socially acceptable. Another big failing from my perspective is that Marion's point of view is so dominant, there isn't room for Tom to speak for himself.)
The ending is heartbreaking. Marion finally does the right thing and tells Tom and the ailing Patrick what she did, and true to form, disappears to leave them to deal with it. I was so angry with her by this point that I didn't even care that the ending was a bit cliched and unnecessarily dramatic.
In short, this isn't a gay romance, nor an exploration of the difficulties of maintaining a public face and an illegal private love. It's a straight woman's vision of those things, written for other straight women, and as I don't fall into that category I found it incredibly insulting and annoying. In the hands of a different writer I believe it could have been far more sensitively handled, and Marion could have even become less loathsome. As it is, for all its good points, it remains horrible.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
My Policeman.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 14, 2014
–
Started Reading
February 14, 2014
– Shelved
February 16, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-21 of 21 (21 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Ventura
(new)
-
rated it 1 star
Apr 29, 2021 05:43AM
You've summed up EXACTLY my thoughts! Very well put.
reply
|
flag
i think that marion is meant to be hated. i agree that i would have liked to read more about patrick and tom, but i feel like marion's charachter is well written in the sense that she thinks like a "typical" young women in the 50's in england would think. i feel like if she was written otherwise, it would not be as realistic ? idk i get what you mean tho
I am so surprised by this outlook! I on the other hand have read so many gay romances that either fly past the subject of having a wife, or create the wife character as some horrible 2 dimensional being without feelings. I thought the book did a great job at showing her ignorance because of the time period, while also allowing us an outlook on what it might be like to have a cheating and emotionally unavailable husband. I empathized with her greatly since we don't typically get to see this point of view, which would no doubt be very painful to live.
I am also quite surprised with this! I felt quite attached to Marion throughout the book and felt that Tom was more frustrating of a character. He was unhappy in his marriage as he knowingly used Marion as his societal cover up from before he proposed when he asked Patrick to share him but was never equally honest with Marion. He began a marriage he could never fully commit himself to. He signed her up for an emotionally distant marriage when he could’ve left her the heartbreak by telling the truth, but he chose a silent, broken, fake marriage instead. She was then committed to a marriage and falling in love with a man who could never love her because he wasn’t honest with her until lives were ruined and commitments were made. Tom’s lack of honesty with himself and Marion brought her to her breaking point. Yes, Sylvia tried to tell her and even her subconscious felt something was wrong. But isn’t young first love always blind? We’re all guilty for falling in love with an idea of someone and disregarding the parts we don’t want to see. And Tom was playing into that idea. She was being manipulated from the beginning and doing what she knew to protect herself and who she thought Tom was.
Annalisa wrote: "I am also quite surprised with this! I felt quite attached to Marion throughout the book and felt that Tom was more frustrating of a character. He was unhappy in his marriage as he knowingly used M..."I agree with your take completely Annalisa!
Marion might be one of my least favorite narrators of all time. I much would’ve preferred the whole book from Patrick’s POV.
Was it just me who was left confused about the effect Marion's letter had? She seemed to believe it was the letter that caused the arrest. However, from Patrick's perspective, it seems to have been the young man's confession. And the letter is never used as evidence in court. I wish we'd gotten some clarity around that.
I completely agree! I was very disappointed that the story is essentially her apologist account of what led her to do what she did and then how she attempted to make up for it 50 years later.
Yes, yes 100 percent this. Why was this book mainly Marion's pov. Let's pile on the tragedy for Patrick then and let Marion play the victim because some one who she knows didn't love her, didn't love her? Oh f*ck off
I totally feel you, I really couldn’t care about Marion POV, because what a bitch!! I don’t understand why the book is predominantly Marion’s POV, trying to justify her despicable behaviour, when Patrick’s and especially Tom’s POV would have been 1) more interesting and 2) the whole point of a LGBT+ story.
I couldn’t care less of the POV of a person who outs a gay person (especial when is ILLEGAL) just out of spite. And also Tom for me is quite a grey area, because ok we get it, your life is hard and your are not free to live your love but he should have not taken advantage of Marion’s being naïve and in love with him. Nonetheless Marion’s actions are unforgivable.
Interesting because while I didn’t really like Marion, I was enraged by how sad her story was and that nobody is talking about it. Yes of course the tragic romance of the men was going to take center stage. All of it was awful. But being a sheltered woman in a small town in England in the 1950’s was no picnic either. She didn’t have the emotional or social capacity to deal with any of it. I don’t think she had any idea what Tom’s sister meant as a warning to her or how to handle her friendship with Julia at first. Homosexuality was so out of her depth. That she showed remorse in the end after having sacrificed her whole life for this man who didn’t deserve her support was at least something.
Agree (@nicole) i really thing That the Point That it is about the sad Love of Tom WHICH INCLUDES PATRICK AND MARION is forgotten through marions actions. Yeah i also absoulutely disliked marions actions they were false and fatal but they were necessary for the Story. She was so unworldly (i guess she just did Not know what she did, even though she knew the consequenzes) what i mean is That she just did Not know how to handle the Situation so she did what she had to do. Through that the painful Reality gets clear That they want different things out of their marriage
i fully agree with you. this book was clearly written by a straight woman in order to be read by straight women who consume mlm literature. I kind of enjoyed the fact that the characters weren't plain - I mean, they're so weird and out of normality that at least they're entertaining. but while I was reading, I kept expecting for the action to come. it's just kind of boring, it's an unnecessarily "tragic" book that shows how hard queer's lives are with no intent of denunciation or whatsoever








