M. Borga, O. Friman, P. Lundberg and H. Knutsson
M. Borga, O. Friman, P. Lundberg and H. Knutsson
Figure 1: Extracted time-courses for experimental fMRI data. BSS in fMRI FMRI data can be explored from both a temporal and a spatial point of view. In temporal analysis we are searching for interesting time-courses in the fMRI data. Examples are stimulus induced time-courses or time-courses containing pronounced drift or motion artifacts. In temporal data-driven fMRI analysis there are more voxels than time points, making the problem of recovering the underlying sources ill-posed. Therefore, preprocessing and relevant dimensionality reduction are required in order to reduce the number of mixtures. In spatial analysis we assume that each acquired fMRI image is a mixture of a set of underlying basis images. The basis images are assumed to reect locations of independently occurring processes. Here, we try to recover the underlying basis images by linearly unmixing the acquired fMRI images. In this case there are signicantly more samples of each mixture and therefore dimension reduction may not be necessary. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS The PCA, Fast ICA and CCA methods were applied on experimental fMRI data. The experiment was a 180 time-points long mental calculation task where a volunteer added numbers. In the temporal analysis, all within-brain voxel time-courses were used as input to PCA. The nine rst eigen-time-courses were subsequently used as input to ICA and the CCA. The resulting temporal components are shown in the gure. The CCA always give the same solutions, which is not the case with ICA. The solutions in the CCA approach are sorted by auto-correlation. In the table below the computational time in seconds for analyzing a single 128 128 fMRI slice with 180 time points are reported. Method Temporal Spatial PCA 40 30 Fast ICA 0.5 110 CCA <0.01 5 Even though Fast ICA is a very fast implementation of ICA, the pure CCA method is obviously better in terms of computational complexity by at least an order of magnitude. REFERENCES [1] M. McKeown et. al. Human Brain Mapping, 6(3):160188, 1998. [2] P. Switzer and A. A. Green. Technical Report 6, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, 1984.