0% found this document useful (0 votes)
584 views1 page

Rubric For Design Technology and Digital Technology Island Project

The rubric assesses learners on their design and building of an island community model. It contains 8 categories: design brief, town planning, design of building, unplugged coding, working in partnership, coding, effort, and overall achievement. For each category, criteria are provided to assess performance at levels of 4 (excellent), 3 (proficient), 2 (developing) or 1 (beginning). The rubric aims to evaluate how well learners follow the design brief, plan their town, design and build their structure, work with a partner, and engage with coding activities.

Uploaded by

api-389000148
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
584 views1 page

Rubric For Design Technology and Digital Technology Island Project

The rubric assesses learners on their design and building of an island community model. It contains 8 categories: design brief, town planning, design of building, unplugged coding, working in partnership, coding, effort, and overall achievement. For each category, criteria are provided to assess performance at levels of 4 (excellent), 3 (proficient), 2 (developing) or 1 (beginning). The rubric aims to evaluate how well learners follow the design brief, plan their town, design and build their structure, work with a partner, and engage with coding activities.

Uploaded by

api-389000148
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Assessment Rubric for Design and Building of Island

Learners Name: Adapted from https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/p-10/aciq/p-10-technologies/year-2-technologies

CATEGORY 4 3 2 1

Design Brief Learner was very directed, active and Learner was mostly active and vocal Learner identified some aspects of Learner did not actively
vocal during the planning stage of the during the planning stage of the the community during the planning demonstrate any knowledge of
community. community. stage of the community. aspects of a community.

Town Planning Learner was able to complete the Learner completed most of the Learner completed the worksheet Learner did not complete the
town planning worksheet identifying planning worksheet and identified but was unable to identify what worksheet and did not produce a
possible ways to improve their aspects of their design building worked well or not well during the building resource to add to the
building structure or identify why process. design process. community island.
their building structure was
particularly well made.
Design of the building Learners followed the design brief Learner followed the design brief Learner followed aspects of the Learner did not contribute to the
and completed the town planning and completed aspects of the design brief. Learner was a quiet design process of the building
assessment worksheet in full. worksheet. Learner discussed their contributor to the discussion on the resource to add to the island
Learners were actively discussing design with others and presented a island community resources. community. Learner relied on their
their building design with others and well made building to add to the Learner presented a building to add partner to complete the resource
using graphical representation island community. to the island community. required for the assessment.
techniques. Learner presented a well
made, detailed and creative building
to add to the class island community.
Unplugged coding Learner successfully obtained the Learner obtained the resources Learner was able to gather Learner made no attempt to gather
resources required to complete the required and had a moderate resources with prompting and made the resources or to try the coding
activity. Learner made several attempt at coding. a moderate attempt at coding using challenge.
attempts at coding and was able to the example shown.
demonstrate their ability to code.
Working within a partnership Learner successful demonstrate many Learner demonstrated their ability Leaner is developing their ability to Learner did not discuss the project
ways to work well with their partner. to work within a partnership. work in partnership to negotiate and was unable to negotiate and
Negotiation and exploring the debrief Learner is developing skills to and discuss projects. discuss the project with their
and coding. negotiate and discuss projects. partner.
Coding Learner successfully demonstrated Learner successfully demonstrated Learner successfully developed a Learner made no attempt to
their ability to develop a code to walk their ability to code and was code but was unable to manipulate demonstrate coding.
their bee bot from one destination to focussed in their attempt to the code to ensure the Bee bot
another. recognise how to change their code reached its destination.
to reposition Beebot to arrive at its
destination.
Effort Learner was actively involved with all Learner was involved with some Learner was involved with some Learner was not actively involved
aspects of the creative process and aspects of the creative process and aspects of the creative process with during this unit.
the design process. the design process. minimal involvement within the
design brief.

You might also like