This document provides a grading rubric for a Java program assignment with categories for program execution, correct output, design of output, design of logic, standards, and documentation. Each category is scored on a scale from excellent (9-10 points) to poor (0-2 points) based on how well the program meets the criteria in that category.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
686 views
Grading Rubrics
This document provides a grading rubric for a Java program assignment with categories for program execution, correct output, design of output, design of logic, standards, and documentation. Each category is scored on a scale from excellent (9-10 points) to poor (0-2 points) based on how well the program meets the criteria in that category.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Grading Rubrics
Java Program (50 pts)
This assignment is to write an application using the Java programming language.
Program (50 pts) (Excellent) (Good) (Fair) (Poor)
Program Program Program Program does not execution executes executes with a execute (0-1) correctly with no minor (easily syntax or fixed error) (2-3) runtime errors (9-10) Correct output Program Output has Output has Output is displays correct minor errors (6- multiple errors incorrect (0-2) output with no 8) (3-5) errors (9-10) Design of output Program Program displays Program does Output is poorly displays more minimally not display the designed (0-2) than expected expected output required output (7-8) (5-6) (3-4)
Design of logic Program is Program has Program has Program is
logically well slight logic significant logic incorrect (0-2) designed (9-10) errors that do no errors (3-5) significantly affect the results (6-8) Standards Program is Few Several Program is stylistically well inappropriate inappropriate poorly written (0- designed (6-7) design choices design choices 1) (i.e. poor (i.e. poor variable names, variable names, improper improper indentation) (4- indentation) (2- 5) 3) Documentation Program is well Missing one Missing two or Most or all documented (5) required more required documentation comment (4) comments (2-3) missing (0-1)