Case Study For Government Project MGMT
Case Study For Government Project MGMT
The functional
organizational structures
and the Project
Managers
PUBLISHED BY TWPROJECT STAFF / IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
What is a functional organizational structure?
The advantages of a functional organizational structure
Disadvantages of a functional organizational structure
The role of the project manager within a functional organizational structure
What is a functional organizational structure?
A functional organizational structure is composed by project team members allocated
according to the different functional units of an organization.
A typical organization has different functional units, such as the Human Resources,
Finance, Marketing, Sales, Operations, IT, Administration, etc.
Each unit is managed by a functional manager who reports to the strategic direction of the
organization.
In a large organization, the heads of the individual functional units may have other
operational managers working under them and reporting directly to them. The larger the
organization, the more levels it will have the functional unit.
For example, the HR department can have an HR head manager, under which we find
additional HR managers. Each sub-responsible will deal with different aspects of this
same department such as hiring, payroll management, staff training, etc.
All these managers work in harmony with the human resources department head in order
to achieve the overall goals of the HR department.
It is not mandatory that all units of an organization are present in a project. The
employees will in fact be assigned only on the basis of the requirements of the given
project. For some projects, for example, no member from the Marketing department may
be needed while more specialists of the HR department may be required.
No change. The projects are completed within the basic functional structure of the
organization. There is no radical change in the operations and structure of the
organization.
Flexibility. There is maximum flexibility regarding the use of team members.
Specialists from different functional units can be temporarily assigned to the project,
after which they return to their normal work. With many specialists available within
each functional department, people can be exchanged between different projects with
relative ease.
In-depth expertise. If the primary responsibility of the project is assigned to the
correct functional unit, it is possible to make use of in-depth expertise on the most
crucial aspects of the project.
Easy post-project transition. Normal career paths are maintained within a
functional department. While specialists can make a significant contribution to
projects, their functional unit is their professional home, therefore the focus of their
professional growth and advancement. The project becomes like a temporary home for
the staff member and, once it is completed, the employee returns to his “real”
permanent home which is the functional department.
A functional organizational structure is – in general – more suitable for projects that
require greater technical experience.
Disadvantages of a functional organizational structure
Lack of attention. Each functional unit has its own basic work to do and it
happens that project responsibilities are set aside to meet these primary obligations.
This becomes even more difficult when the project has different priorities for different
units. For example, the marketing department can consider one project urgent while
other departments consider it only of secondary importance – if not a real waste of
time. This can lead to delays and quality problems.
Poor integration. There may be poor integration between functional units.
Functional specialists tend to care only about their own project segment and not what
is best for the project in general.
Slow. In general, more time is needed to complete projects within a functional
organizational structure. This is partly attributable to slow response times. Information
on the project and decisions must be disseminated through the normal management
channels that do not consider horizontal communication between departments. For
example, if a staff member of functional unit A needs to solve a problem involving a
team member of functional unit C, the problem must first be assumed by the manager
of A, who must then coordinate with the manager of C that can then reach team C
member in order to get the relevant information and then retransmit it along the same
path back to the staff member of A. This, as is easily deducible, is a complicated
process and can cause delays and stress.
Lack of ownership. The motivation of the people assigned to the project may be
weak. The project can be seen as additional work not directly related to one’s
professional development. Moreover, since project members only work on one part of
the project, they do not identify with the project as a whole. Lack of ownership thus
discourages team members who may not engage enough in project-related activities.
The result, even in this case, will be a problem of quality of the results.
To reach our conclusion, we can say that, in general, the functional organizational
structure can work well in a company that mainly carries out repetitive work.
Related Posts
Twproject
Feature tour
Try Twproject Online
Try Twproject on your Server
Press Kit
Help Us Grow
Customers
Customers
Customer experience
Use cases
Universities
Non profit
Features
Project Management
Get Your Projects Done
Team Management
Issue Tracking
Time Tracking
Cost Management
Document Management
Support
Online guide
FAQ
Services
Contact