Financial Ratio Analysis of Sbi (2009 - 2016) : S. Subalakshmi, S. Grahalakshmi and M. Manikandan
Financial Ratio Analysis of Sbi (2009 - 2016) : S. Subalakshmi, S. Grahalakshmi and M. Manikandan
698
ISSN: 2395-1664 (ONLINE) ICTACT JOURNAL ON MANAGEMENT STUDIES, FEBRUARY 2018, VOLUME: 04, ISSUE: 01
Prathap et al. [4] indicated ALM in Indian banking system is The results were summarized in capsule form. Therefore, he
still in a nascent stage. Against this backdrop, the objective of the recommended that the burden rate should be reduced by effecting
research was to study and analyze the status of ALM approach in cost control measures, and the spread rate be increased so that the
the Indian banking system. This study also indicates a strong profitability may be at a higher rate.
relationship between fixed assets and net worth for all groups of Sinha et al. [12] compared the performance of 40 Indian
banks. commercial banks using Window Analysis, considering deposit
Chaudhary et al. [5] stated that recently the Indian economy mobilizations as the output indicator. Among the in-samples
has witnessed the emergence of many banks in the private sector. banks, the private sector banks performed better than the public
There are several reasons behind the increasing number of sector banks.
commercialization of banks. The growth of such banks is not
possible unless they witness some success in the context of 3. IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY
customer satisfaction or may it be the net assets held by these
banks, efficiency of their management or the networks of each The study is important as it is believed that banks with good
bank both in private as well as the public sector bank. Asset & Liability behaviour can maximize their earnings and also
Arias et al. [6] presented an econometric model to study the satisfy their social objectives as required by the Government and
determinants of profitability of the top five banks of United States. the Reserve Bank of India. At present, when most of the public
The study observed that capital asset ratio had positive impact on sector banks are reeling under the pressure of growing NPA, focus
profitability as large banks had ability to compete efficiently even on aspects of Assets and Liability behaviour can help the banks to
if the macroeconomic factor did not support. cut down their risk exposure as well as unnecessary spending so
Ibrahim et al. [7] stated that Indian scheduled commercial as to strengthen their balance sheet.
banks have improved their operational performance since 2000. In the context of strong opposition for privatization of public
There is constant increase in aggregate deposits. The C-D ratio sector commercial banks, this study attempts to analyse the
also shows an increasing trend. The investment deposit ratio and financial performances of State Bank of India and to identify the
priority sector advances have also gone up. reasons for the lag in performance of SBI and the possible
Ravinder et al. (2011) analyzed the profitability of four major corrective measures.
banks in India. The study revealed that State Bank of India
performed better in terms of earning per share and dividend 4. METHODOLOGY
payout ratio, while Punjab National Bank performed better in
terms of operating profit margin and return on equity [8]. In the present study, secondary data available over seven
Devamohan et al. [9], calculated the business ratios, such as years: 2009-2016 from various sources have been analyzed.
interest income to average working funds, non-interest income to Researcher has heavily relied upon the Reserve bank of India
average working funds, operating profit to average working publications, the Annual reports and balance sheets of SBI.
funds, return on assets, business per employee and profit per Government publications such as publications of individual
employee for public sector banks, private sector banks and foreign commercial banks were also collected for this study.
banks for the period 2004-05 to 2008-09. It was observed that the
foreign banks and new generation private banks have superior 5. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS OF SBI DURING
business ratios. They effectively leverage technology, 2009-2016
outsourcing and workforce professionalism which helped them to
protect their bottom line. The Reserve bank of India identifies various items of assets
Vyas et al. [10] used multiple regression models to compare and liabilities under schedules 1 to 12. The Financial statements
mean capital to risk weighted assets ratio of various bank groups. of banks are actually prepared in 18 schedules in accordance to
They found a significant difference in the CRAR (Capital to Risk special provision of third schedule of Section 29 of Banking
Weighted Asset Ratio) of State Bank of India group and Foreign Regulation Act, 1949. Out of these, 12 schedules are allocated to
Banks operating in India in comparison to that of nationalized the Balance Sheet and schedules 13-16 are allocated to the
banks group. There is no significant difference in the CRAR of Income Statement. The other schedules are related to notes of
Indian private banks and that of nationalized banks, the study accounts, provision and contingencies or significant accounting
observed. policy changes.
Pasupathy et al. [11] stated that there were several factors that
determined the operating efficiency and profitability of the bank.
699
S SUBALAKSHMI et al.: FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS OF SBI [2009 - 2016]
Table.2. Profit and Loss account of SBI from 2009-16 (‘000 omitted)
Items 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Income
Interest Earned 70993,91,75 81394,36,38 106521,45,34 119655,10,00 136350,80,39 152397,07,42 163685,30,61
Other Income 14968,15,27 15824,59,42 14351,44,57 16036,84,23 18552,91,64 22575,89,26 28158,36,01
Total I 85962,07,02 97218,95,80 120872,89,91 135691,94,23 154903,72,03 174972,96,68 191843,66,62
Expenditure
Interest Expended 47322,47,80 48867,95,61 63230,36,87 75325,79,65 87068,63,25 97381,82,36 106803,49,21
Operating Expenses 20318,68,00 23015,43,26 26068,99,21 29284,42,23 35725,85,13 38677,64,14 41782,36,65
Provisions for contingencies 9154,85,92 17071,05,03 19866,24,97 16976,73,86 21218,06,48 25811,92,98 33307,15,39
Total II 76796,01,72 88954,43,90 109165,61,05 121586,95,74 144012,54,86 161871,39,48 181893,01,25
Net Profit
I-II 9166,05,30 8264,51,90 11707,28,86 14104,98,49 10891,17,17 13101,57,20 9950,65,37
Profit b/f 33,93 33,93 33,93 33,93 33,93 32,48 32,48
Total 9166,39,23 8264,85,83 11713,33,94 14105,32,42 10891,51,10 13101,89,68 9950,97,85
Source: Published Annual Report of SBI from 2009-16
700
ISSN: 2395-1664 (ONLINE) ICTACT JOURNAL ON MANAGEMENT STUDIES, FEBRUARY 2018, VOLUME: 04, ISSUE: 01
701
S SUBALAKSHMI et al.: FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS OF SBI [2009 - 2016]
than by creditors. This involves more risk for the investors It can be concluded that, the SBI always maintains around 67
because the SBI is highly levered with Debt. percentage of excess of interest earned over interest expended on
around 35%.
6.4 RETURN ON EQUITY RATIO
Table.7. Interest Expenses Ratio of SBI (‘000 omitted)
It measures the amount of net income after taxes earned for
Equity Capital contributed by the bank’s stock holders. The Interest Operating Interest
formula to calculate the return on Equity ratio is Year
Expenses Income Expenses Ratio
Return on Equity Ratio = Net income/Total Equity Capital 2009-10 47322,47,80 70993,91,75 0.67
The ratio Net Income to total equity capital of SBI during the
2010-11 48867,95,61 81394,36,38 0.60
study Period is shown in the following Table.6.
2011-12 63230,36,87 106521,45,34 0.59
Table.6. Return on Equity Ratio of SBI (‘000 omitted) 2012-13 106817,91,29 167976,13,88 0.64
Return on 2013-14 121479,04,34 189062,44,04 0.64
Year Net Income Equity Capital
Equity Capital 2014-15 97381,82,36 152397,07,42 0.64
2009-10 9166,39,23 634,88,26 14.44 2015-16 106803,49,21 163685,30,61 0.65
2010-11 8264,85,83 634,99,90 13.02 Average = 0.63
2011-12 15866,02,25 671,04,48 23.64 Maximum = 0.67
2012-13 18808,97,28 684,03,40 27.50 Minimum = 0.59
2013-14 10891,51,10 746,57,31 14.59 Computed Secondary Data
2014-15 13101,89,68 746,57,31 17.55
6.6 PROFIT MARGIN RATIO
2015-16 9950,97,85 776,27,77 12.82
Profit Margin measures bank’s ability to control expenses and
Average = 20.16
thus its ability to produce net income from its operating income
Maximum =27.50 (or revenue). These ratios measure the proportion of total
Minimum = 12.82 operating income that goes to pay the particular expense item. The
formula to calculate the Profit Margin Ratio is,
Computed Secondary Data
Profit Margin Ratio = Net Income/Total Operating Income
The Table.6 shows that the average returns on equity ratio of
SBI during the study period have registered as 20.16. The The ratio Net Income to Total Operating income of SBI during
maximum ratio was registered as 27.50 in the year 2012-13 and the study period is shown in the following Table.8.
the minimum average returns on equity ratio was registered as
12.82 in the year 2015-16 during the study period. Table.8. Profit Margin Ratio of SBI (‘000 omitted)
The Average Return on Equity ratio is 20.16 and this indicates Total Profit
how well the SBI is making effective use of the shareholder’s Year Net Income Operating Margin
capital. In other words Higher the Return on Equity will be better. Income Ratio
6.5 INTEREST EXPENSES TO OPERATING 2009-10 9166,39,23 70993,91,75 0.13
INCOME RATIO 2010-11 8264,85,83 81394,36,38 0.10
Interest expenses constitute the major part of Total expenses 2011-12 15866,02,25 106521,45,34 0.15
incurred by any bank. Interest is paid on the amount deposited by 2012-13 18808,97,28 167976,13,88 0.11
customers on various schemes like Fixed Deposit Schemes and
2013-14 10891,51,10 189062,44,04 0.06
Savings bank account. The formula to calculate the interest
expenses ratio is, 2014-15 13101,89,68 152397,07,42 0.09
Interest Expenses 2015-16 9950,97,85 163685,30,61 0.06
Interest Expenses Ratio=
Total Operating Income Average = 0.11
The ratio Interest expenses to total operating income of SBI Maximum = 0.15
during the study period is shown in the following Table.7. Minimum = 0.06
It is apparent from the Table.7 that the average Interest
Computed Secondary Data
expenses ratio of SBI during the study period was 0.63. The
maximum interest expenses ratio was 0.67 in the year 2009-10 The Table.8 highlights that the average profit margin ratio of
and the minimum interest expenses ratio was registered as 0.59 SBI during the study period was registered as 0.11. The maximum
2011-12 during the study period. average profit margin ratio was registered as 0.15 in the year
2011-12 and the minimum average profit margin ratio was
registered as 0.06 in the year 2015-16.
702
ISSN: 2395-1664 (ONLINE) ICTACT JOURNAL ON MANAGEMENT STUDIES, FEBRUARY 2018, VOLUME: 04, ISSUE: 01
The Average Profit Margin ratio is 11% and this low profit Table.10. NPA to Advance Ratio of SBI (in crores)
margin indicates the expenses are too high and need to cut
expenses. NPA to Advance Ratio
Year Net NPA Advance
(%)
6.7 NET INTEREST MARGIN RATIO 2009-10 10870.17 631914.15 1.72
The most important ratio when it comes to banks is the Net 2010-11 12,346.90 756719.44 1.63
Interest margin. Net Interest Margin is the difference between the 2011-12 15818.85 867578.89 1.82
interest income generated and the amount of interest paid out to
their lenders deposit divided by total assets. The Net Interest 2012-13 21,956.48 1392608.03 1.58
Margin is calculated by using the formula, 2013-14 31,096.07 1578276.69 1.97
703
S SUBALAKSHMI et al.: FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS OF SBI [2009 - 2016]
• The maximum of Net Interest margin ratio of SBI is 0.03 in a sufficient progress in the SBI and the overall performance of the
the years 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 and the Bank is good. The performance of SBI bank has been analyzed in
minimum Net interest Margin ratio of SBI is 0.02 in the detail in terms of deposit mobilization, loans and advances,
years 2009-10, 2014-15 and 2015-16. investment position, non-performing assets, earnings and
• The Maximum of NPA to Advance ratio was registered at profitability efficiency. According to the analysis, the SBI is
2.98% and the minimum of NPA to Advance ratio was maintaining the required standards and running profitability. SBI
registered at 1.63 in the year 2015-16 and 2010-11 have more profitability because it enters into the industry as well
respectively. as commercial market also and regularly it improving the service
quality level. In this highly competitive global environment it is
8. SUGGESTIONS imperative for the SBI bank to show outstanding performance in
various parameters.
On the basis of the analysis and interpretations of the collected
data, the researcher has identified some suggestions for REFERENCES
consideration. On the basis of the study the following suggestions
are given to the State Bank of India to improve their performance. [1] J.D. Agarwal, “Finance India”, Available at:
• In contrast, large banks generally lack sufficient deposits to http://www.india_financing.com, Accessed on 2016.
fund their main business dealing with large companies, [2] Alaaeddin Al-Tarawneh and Mohmmad Khataybeh,
governments, other financial institutions, and wealthy “Portfolio Behaviour of Commercial Banks: The Expected
individuals. Most borrow the funds they need from other Utility Approach: Evidence from Jordan”, International
major lenders in the form of short term liabilities which must Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Vol. 5, No, 2,
be continually rolled over. This is known as liability pp. 62-68, 2015.
management, a much riskier method than asset management. [3] Narayan Baser, “Asset and Liability Management of
The SBI should maintain enough liquidity to cover any Scheduled Commercial Banks”, International Journals of
unforeseen fund requirements because its Credit Deposit Marketing and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 20-44, 2014.
ratio is 83% which means that out of every Rs.100 deposited [4] Suman Chakrabotry and Subhalaxmi Mohapatra, “An
Rs.83 being lent. So there is a need to maintain sufficient Empirical Study of Asset Liability Management by Indian
liquidity. Banks”, SSRN, pp. 1-11, 2009.
• The Average Equity Multiplier Ratio is higher in SBI, this [5] Garima Chaudhary, “Performance Comparison of Private
indicates that more Assets are funded by Debt than the Sector Banks with the Public Sector Banks in India with
Reference to Assets and Liabilities”, International Journal
Equity, involves more risky for the investors and SBI is
of Emerging Research in Management and Technology, Vol.
highly levered with Debts. So the SBI should concentrate on
3, No. 2, pp. 5-12, 2012.
their Equity Fund by attracting large investors to invest in
[6] J.W. Scott and J.C. Arias, “Banking Profitability
their equity shares.
Determinants”, Business Intelligence Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2,
• The Average Profit Margin Ratio is 11%. This is very low
pp. 209-230, 2011.
to the SBI and indicates the expenses are higher. So the SBI
[7] Ibrahim M. Syed, “Operational Performance of Indian
need to prepare efficient budget to cut off the expenses. If
Scheduled Commercial Banks-An Analysis”, International
the expenses are high, it will create adverse impression in
Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 12-
the minds of the shareholders, so the SBI must concentrate
16, 2011.
on it.
[8] K.V.N. Prasad and G. Ravinder, “Performance Evaluation of
• The Maximum of NPA to Advance ratio was registered at Banks: A Comparative Study on SBI, PNB, ICICI & HDFC”,
2.98% and the minimum of NPA to Advance ratio was Advances in Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 43-53, 2011.
registered at 1.63 in the year 2015-16 and 2010-11 [9] Alamelu and Devamohan, “Efficiency of Commercial Banks
respectively. The NPA of SBI are in increasing trend which in India”, IUP Publication, 2010.
shows in SBI bank there are more chances to convert debtors [10] Manmeet Singh and R.K. Vyas, “Capital Adequacy and
in NPA to bad debts in the near future too. Scheduled Commercial Banks in India”, Bauddhik, Vol. 1,
• Interest Expended to Interest Earned ratio of SBI is less No. 1, pp. 18-21, 2009.
satisfactory. It is suggested that the SBI Bank may take some [11] Rajamohan and Pasupathy, “Performance Evaluation of
steps to increase the interest earning capacity of the bank, by Tamil Nadu Industrial Co-operative Bank Ltd.)-An
inviting more deposits from public. Application of Structural and Growth Analysis”, Indian Co-
• The suggestions offered would enable the SBI to take operative Review, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 11-15, 2009.
necessary steps to improve the performance of the SBI. [12] Ram Pratap Sinha and Biswajit Chatterjee, “Bank
Ownership and Deposit Mobilization: A Non-Parametric
9. CONCLUSION Approach”, Prajnan-Journal of Social and Management
Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 159-180, 2009.
The present research work dealt with the performance of SBI
with reference to Ratio analysis and Percentage analysis. There is
704