Control of Compressor Surge With Active Magnetic Bearings
Control of Compressor Surge With Active Magnetic Bearings
Abstract— The design of an active surge controller, which also applicable for centrifugal compressors. After this, many
employs Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs) to stabilize the flow improved and advanced models for axial and centrifugal
in the compressor, is presented in this paper. The axial tip compression systems were presented by different researchers
clearance of an unshrouded centrifugal impeller from a single
stage compressor is modulated relative to the static shroud to in [6]–[12], and stability of compression systems for various
induce a pressure variation in the compressor output pressure. configurations of the inlet and the exhaust piping was studied
This fast-response, high-precision control of the output pressure in [13], [14] and [15]. However the original Greitzer model is
is employed to stabilize the compressor operating in surge still generally preferred in designing active surge controllers
condition. The control law for the tip clearance is derived due to its low order and simple implementation of the
based on a recently introduced mathematical model, and the
performance of the controller is tested through simulation. controller designed based on it.
Efforts to develop reliable model based surge controllers
I. I NTRODUCTION have been ongoing, fueled by the increasing need of boosting
Surge is a dynamics instability in compressors, charac- productivity and improving the safety of the workspace.
Surge suppression and control methods rely on accurate
terized by large-amplitude axisymmetric flow oscillations.
Surge instability can cause extensive damage to the system, plant models to design a surge control law that is able
to stabilize the compression system pass the surge point.
especially during the reversal of the flow in deep surge
Passive surge controllers rely on passive systems, that react
condition, when the impeller and the casing are subject
to high loads and temperatures. Two different approaches to environmental changes in the compressor and suppress the
surge oscillations. On the other hand, active surge controllers,
exist to deal with the surge instability in turbomachineries.
The most common approach in industry is surge avoidance, which were first proposed by Epstein et al. in [16], employ
where the compressor is operated in a conservative way actuators to perturb the compression system according to
feedback measurements from sensors in the flow path. A
within a predetermined stable operating region, and safety
mechanisms “reset” the compressor back to the stable op- brief review of published works on model based surge
control, with both active and passive systems, were presented
eration if surge occurs. This leads to a significant drop in
by Arnulfi et al. in [17]. An important point to consider
compressor efficiency by limiting the compressor output. The
second approach is surge control, where an active or passive in designing a surge control system is the selection of
the appropriate actuator. Simon et al. presented in [18] an
surge controller is implemented such that it compensates
for the disturbances of surge, and stabilizes the flow in the overview of commonly employed actuators for surge control,
compression system. More details on surge avoidance and and demonstrated the complexity of selecting an accessible
actuator with sufficient control authority on the compressor’s
control can be found in [1].
unstable modes and bandwidth to stabilize the flow dynamics
The modeling of compression systems for the active
during surge. Common actuators for passive control systems
control of surge instabilities has been investigated intensively
are the movable plenum wall and the hydraulic oscillator,
over the years, motivated by the potential benefits from
which induce a pressure variation in the compression system
expanding the stable operating region of these machineries.
by changing the plenum volume. On the other hand, and
Reviews of modeling techniques for compression systems
common actuators in active control schemes are the close-
can be found in [1] and [2]. Emmons et al. presented in [3]
coupled valve [11], and the throttle valve [19].
one of the first stability analysis for a compression system
A less considered but also promising actuator for the
using a linearized model, where the initiation of the surge
control of compressor surge is the Active Magnetic Bearing
oscillations was captured by employing the analogy between
(AMB). The use of AMBs for the control of other compres-
the compression system and a self-excited Helmholtz res-
sor instabilities was proposed in [20]. On the other hand,
onator. Using the same principle, Greitzer [4] later intro-
the use of the AMB for the control of surge in single-
duced a two-state nonlinear lumped-parameter model of a
stage centrifugal compressors with unshrouded impeller was
compression system. This model was first derived for axial
proposed by Sanadgol in [21]. The study was based on results
compressors, but it was later demonstrated in [5] that it is
by Senoo [22] and Senoo and Ishida [23] on the change
† S. Y. Yoon and Z. Lin are with Charles L., Brown Department of of the compressor efficiency versus the axial impeller tip
Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, clearance. Sanadgol proposed axially modulating the com-
VA 22904-4743, USA pressor impeller to induce a pressure variation to stabilize
‡ C. Goyne, and P. E. Allaire are with the Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904- surge, and the AMBs were employed as servo actuators to
4746, USA control the axial clearance between the impeller and the static
4324
experimental
curve fit
1.4
1.35
1.25
1.2
1.15
1.1
locations are at 2.2 m, 7.1 m and 15.2 m along the exhaust piping
measured from the compressor. Fig. 5. Fitted characteristic curve of the compressor at 16290 RPM.
4325
TABLE I
where the gain k is a function of the compressor pressure
S YSTEM MODEL PARAMETERS
ratio ψc,ss
Parameter Value
γ k0 γ1 γ−1
γ
B .5246 k=− ψc,ss 1 − ψc,ss ,
ωH (rad/sec) 50.25 γ−1 b
Po1 (Pa) 101,325 1 2
2 ρU
ρ (kg/m3 ) 0.833 ψc,ss = Ψc,ss + 1 .
γ 1.4 Po1
U (m/sec) 213.24
It was demonstrated in [21] that the linearization error
introduced by the above approximation is small for the
allowed range of δ cl .
introduced a simple mathematical expression relating the By defining the states χ and ξ as the variation of the
average impeller tip clearance to the change in the efficiency nondimensional plenum pressure rise and compressor mass-
for a single-stage unshrouded centrifugal compressor. The flow rate from their respective equilibrium values
mathematical expression introduced by Senoo was here ad-
justed to match our observations in the measurements taken χ = Ψp − Ψeq , ξ = Φc − Φeq , (7)
from the experimental setup, such that a variation of 2% in the state equations for the compression system can be
the ratio between the axial impeller clearance cl over the rewritten as the following
blade height b, induces a changes of 1% ratio between the
change of efficiency from its zero-clearance value ∆η, and ξ˙ = BωH (Ψc,ss + kδcl − χ − Ψeq ), (8a)
the current efficiency η. ωH
χ̇ = (ξ − Φth + Φeq ), (8b)
B
∆η cl
− ≈ . (3) and the surge control problem becomes the stabilization of
η 2b the system (8) at the origin (ξ, χ) = (0, 0).
Define δcl = cl0 − cl to be the variation in the tip An H∞ surge controller is derived from a linear approxi-
clearance from the nominal clearance value cl 0 , and the mation of system (8). A linear controller is preferred in this
impeller clearance coefficient k 0 to be case because the tracking limitation of the AMB actuator
can be included into the controller derivation employing
0.5 linear robust control methods. The linearized model for the
k0 = . (4)
1 + 0.5cl
b
0
compression system at a nominal throttle valve opening
uth0 = .28, corresponding to the experimentally observed
Assuming we have isentropic compression and perfect gas surge point, is given by
properties, Ψ c can be expressed as a function of the steady
ξ˙ BωH 1PρU 2k
state compressor pressure rise Ψ c,ss , which is itself is a ξ o1
=A + 2 δcl , (9)
function of the compressor mass flow rate Φ c and obtained χ̇ χ 0
from the compressor characteristic curve at the nominal tip
clearance cl0 , and the variation in the tip clearance δ cl , where the matrix A is defined as
BωH (3a1 Φ2eq + 2b1 Φeq )
γ −BωH
A= . (10)
γ−1
1 2
γ−1 ωH
− ωBH cth0 uth a2
ρ
2 o1 U γ
B
po1 Ψc,ss +1 − 1
Ψc = 1 1+ po1
− 1 . (5) The constants a1 and b1 are the coefficients from the polyno-
2 δ
2 ρo1 U
1 − k0 bcl
mial fit of the characteristic curve, and a 2 is obtained from
the linear approximation of the square root
The density ρo1 is given at the inlet condition, γ is the
Ψeq = a2 Ψeq + b2 . (11)
specific heat ratio, and the impeller tip velocity U is obtained
from the compressor operating speed. Thus, Eqs. (5) and The 2-input 2-output interconnection system shown in
(1) are the state equations representing the dynamics of the Fig. 6 is employed to synthesize the linear controller, where
compression system. Table I gives the values for the dif- GC (s) is the linearized compression system and K C (s) is
ferent model parameters corresponding to the experimental the surge controller. The weighting function W 2 (s) contains
compressor test rig. information on the AMB servo tracking performance, and
weights on the control input to the plant. The benefit of
IV. C ONTROLLER D ESIGN AND S IMULATION this method is that in addition to incorporating a limit to
the actuator bandwidth, it also consider the steady state
In order to simplify the system equations for the derivation tracking error introduced by the dynamics of the closed
of the surge controller, a linear approximation of Eq. (5) is loop AMB, as well as the error from overshoot and other
introduced. By keeping the first order terms of the Taylor transient dynamics. We define W 2 (s) = 4s/(s + 400), such
expansion, the equation for the compressor pressure rise can that it upper-bounds the sensitivity function of an acceptable
be written as AMB dynamics.The function W 4 (s) weights the added noise
Ψc ≈ Ψc,ss + kδcl , (6) to the plant output, and contains the information of noise
4326
90
80
Magnitude (dB)
70
60
50
40 Experimental
Model w/ throttle piping
30
−1 0 1
10 10 10
50
Phase (Deg)
−50
Fig. 6. Interconnection system for the synthesis of H∞ controller
−100
−150
31
Therefore, a nonlinear mass-flow rate observer is derived 30
from the system equations (1) as presented in [28]. The state 29
2 ρU
1.4
Φ̂c = z + B 2 cΨp . (12b)
Ψp
1.2
4327
1.8
char. curve [7] R. L. Elder and M. E. Gill, “A discussion of the factors affecting
simulation
surge in centrifugal compressors,” ASME Journal of Engineering for
1.6
Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 107, pp. 499–506, 1985.
[8] F. K. Moore and E. M. Greitzer, “A theory of post-stall transients
in axial compressor systems: part i–development of equations,” ASME
1.4
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 108, pp. 68–
76.
[9] D. A. Fink, N. A. Cumpsty, and E. M. Greitzer, “Surge dynamics
in a free-spool centrifugal compressor system,” ASME Journal of
Ψp
1.2
Turbomachinery, vol. 114, pp. 321–332, 1992.
[10] K. K. Botros, “Transient phenomena in compressor stations during
1 surge,” ASME Jounal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,
vol. 116.
[11] J. T. Gravdahl and O. Egeland, “Centrifugal compressor surge and
0.8 speed control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,
vol. 7, pp. 567–579.
[12] M. Morini, M. Pinelli, and M. Venturini, “Development of a one-
0.6 dimensional modular dynamic model for the simulation of surge in
−0.1 −0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
Φc compression systems,” ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 129,
pp. 437–447, 2007.
[13] C. R. Sparks, “On the transient interaction of centrifugal compressors
Fig. 9. Ψp over Φc for the uncontrolled system simulation
and their piping systems,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Power,
vol. 105, pp. 891–901.
0.2 [14] N. Hagino, Y. Kashiwabara, and K. Uda, “Prediction and active
control of surge inception in centrifugal compressor system without
0.15
plenum,” in 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference
& Exhibit.
δcl (mm)
0.1
4328