Integral Domains
Integral Domains
INTEGRAL
DOMAINS
Basic definitions ………………………………………………………..03
E
X Assume A is an integral domain. Elements a,b ∈ A are associates iff (a) = (b)
A (meaning a | b and b | a).
M "Associates => (a)=(b)"
P If a = ub then a ∈ (b) and (a) ⊆ (b).
L Since u∈ Ax u-1 a = b implying b ∈ (a) and (b) ⊆ (a) => (a) = (b)
E "(a)=(b) => Associates"
If (a) = (b) then a = ub and b=va for some u,v ∈ A.
Thus a = ub = uva = a => uv = 1, u and v are units => associates
L
E
M
M
A
UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAIN
UFD NOT UFO!!!
UFD
COMMUTATIVE RING
DONEC<< QUIS
INTEGRAL
NUNCDOMAIN << UFD
1.
E
X
A Assume A is an integral domain. Elements a,b ∈ A are associates iff (a) = (b)
M (meaning a | b and b | a).
P "Associates => (a)=(b)"
L If a = ub then a ∈ (b) and (a) ⊆ (b).
E Since u∈ Ax u-1 a = b implying b ∈ (a) and (b) ⊆ (a) => (a) = (b)
"(a)=(b) => Associates"
If (a) = (b) then a = ub and b=va for some u,v ∈ A.
Thus a = ub = uva = a => uv = 1, u and v are units => associates
L
E
M
M
A
EXAM QUESTION
There exist two different factorisations (to show that they are not equivalent
prove that they are not associate), meaning not a UFD.
Elements are irreducible, meaning it is an FD.
Although elements are irreducible, they are not prime.
THEORE
M
Let A be a factorization domain. Then A is a UFD iff every irreducible element is prime.
"=>"
Assume FD. Assume that an element a has two decompositions into irreducible
elements a = ∏ᵐpᵢ = ∏ⁿqᵢ. By assumption, all pᵢ and qᵢ are prime.
Let p = pᵣ. Then p should divide one of q (assume it is qᵣ).
But qᵣ is irreducible, therefore qᵣ = u·p for some u ∈ Aˣ.
Dividing by p we get ∏ᵐ⁻¹pᵢ = u∏ⁿ⁻¹qᵢ. By induction on m, these factorizations are
the same up to the permutation of factors and multiplication of units => UFD.
This completes the proof of our theorem. Both directions have been shown.
PRINCIPAL IDEAL DOMAIN
BUT NOT THE SCHOOL’S PRINCIPAL!!
PRINCIPAL IDEAL DOMAIN
COMMUTATIVE RING
DONEC
< INTEGRAL
QUIS NUNC
DOMAIN < UFD < PID
Ley p ∈ A be irreducible and let p | ab. Assume p ∤ a. The ideal (p,a) is a principal
ideal (PID condition), therefore (p,a) = (d) for some d ∈ A.
In particular p ∈ (d) implying p = cd. Irreducibility means that either c ∈ Aˣ or d ∈
Aˣ hold. If c ∈ Aˣ then (p) = (d) ∋ a and p | a. CONTRADICTION.
Our assumption is wrong and p | a, meaning p is prime.
1.
1. d | a and d | b
2. If c | a and c | b then c | d
Not all rings have gcd but it always exists in PID and UFD
If d is a gcd then any of its associates is also a gcd. If c, d are two gcd of a
and b then both c | d and d | c must hold!!!!
LEAST COMMON MULTIPLE
EL MÁSDONEC
PEQUEQUIS
DE LOS
NUNC
GRANDES
1.
1. a | m and b | m
2. If a | c and b | c then m | c
Not all rings have lcm but it always exists in PID and UFD
THEORE
M
Let A be a PID. Then a, b ∈ A are coprime (gcd=1) if there exist x, y ∈ A such that ax + by
=1
"=>"
Any two elements in a UFD can be written in terms of irreducible elements and a unit
(invertible element)… ∀a, b ∈ A …
a = u ∏ pᵢᵏ b = v ∏ pᵢᴸ
where u, v ∈ Aˣ; p₁… pᵢ are distinct prime elements (not associate) with k, l ≥ 0.
Define…
d = ∏pˢ m = ∏pᵀ
s= min{k,l} t= max{k,l}
We claim that d = gcd(a,b) and m = lcm(a,b). Let us show this for d. Assume that c | a and
c | b. Up to a unit we can write c = ∏ pʳ where r ≤ k and r ≤ l. This implies that r ≤ l
meaning c | d as required.
EUCLIDIAN DOMAINS
EL DE EL EUCLIDES
An integral domain A is called a Euclidean domain if there exists a
function δ: R\{0}→ ℕ = {0, 1, 2, …} (degree function or Euclidean
function) such that ∀a,b ∈A\{0} there exist elements q, r ∈A with a =
bq + r and either r = 0 or 𝛿 (r) < 𝛿 (b).
Let us choose a polynomial q ∈ A[x] such that the polynomial r:= f - gq has the minimal
possible degree. Assume that r = rᵤxᵁ + … + r₀ has degree u ≥ d. Then
F = (g · q) + r => F - (g · q) = r
F - (g · q) - (g · rᵤxᵁ⁻ᵈ) = r - (g · rᵤxᵁ⁻ᵈ )
F - g · (q + rᵤxᵁ⁻ᵈ) = r - (g · rᵤxᵁ⁻ᵈ ) = (∑ᵁ⁻¹(rᵦxᵝ)) - (∑ᵈ⁻¹ (rᵤgᵦxᵁ⁻ᵈ⁺ᵝ))
Which has degree < d, a contradiction. To prove the uniqueness, assume that f = gq’ + r’
with deg (r’) < d. Then g(q - q’) = r - r’. If q ≠ q’ then deg(g(q − q’)) ≥ deg g = d and
deg(r − r′) < d, a contradiction. Therefore q = q’, hence also r = r’.
THEORE
M
An element a ∈ A is a root of a polynomial f ∈ A[x] (i.e. f(a) = 0) iff (x - a) divides f.
"=>"
We can divide f with a remainder (r) as follows:
f = g · (x - a) + r
where deg(r) < deg(x-a) = 1. Hence r ∈ A (a constant). We know that "a" is a root so at
f(a) we have:
f(a) = g (a - a) + r = g · 0 + r = 0 => r = 0
Hence f = g (x-a) and (x - a) divides f.
"<="
If (x-a) divides f then it is clear that f = (x-a)g and a is a root
If A is an integral domain, then a polynomial f ∈ A[x] has at most deg(f)
roots. If "a" is a root of f then we write… f = (x-a)q with deg(q) = deg(f) - 1.
Any root of f different from "a" is a root of q.
If A is NOT an integral domain, then f ∈ A[x] can have more than deg(f)
roots.
If K is an infinite field and f, g ∈ K[x] are polynomials such that f(a) = g(a)
for all a ∈ K then f - g have infinitely many roots and f-g = 0.
The ring Z[i] ={x + iy| x,y ∈ Z}⊆ℂ is called the ring of Gaussian integers. It is
a Euclidean domain with degree function 𝜹 (x + iy) = |x + iy|²