2019 AIC22A2 Test 1
2019 AIC22A2 Test 1
Information to students:
Auditing is defined as the process of inspecting or checking financial statements to ensure they are free
from material misstatement
REQUIRED:
1.1 Explain the various concepts that exist that form the fundamental beliefs for auditing. (6)
1.2 Can an auditor provide assurance and non-assurance services to the same client? You are required
to motivate your answer. (2)
1.3 Discuss whether a registered external auditor can give absolute assurance regarding financial
statements. You are required to give reasons in your discussion. (5)
1.4 Give the definition of an assertion. (2)
In lectures you learnt that public interest is the interest the public have in companies, because such
businesses operate within the society and among other things use resources belonging to the society such
as roads, natural resources, employees and derive their profits out of the society. Therefore the
public/society has an interest in businesses to see how things are done, how such businesses are run, how
resources are used etc.
REQUIRED:
2.1 What is the purpose of a public interest score? (1)
2.2 Clothes-For-All (Pty) Ltd is a company that sells clothing with a financial year end of December.
The entity anticipates to increase revenue by 10% in the 2019 financial year from R50,000,000 in
the 2018 financial year to R55,000,000. The total number of employees on 31 December 2018 was
65. During 2018, 5 employees resigned and 10 employees were hired.
Page 2 of 4
AIC22A2 – Test 1 - 2019
The financial statements were compiled by Book-Keep-It (Pty) Ltd. This company is owned by the
former Chief Financial Officer of Clothes-For-Me (Pty) Ltd who resigned in the 2013 financial
year to start his company.
You are required to calculate the public interest score for Clothes-For-Me (Pty) Ltd at 31 December
2018. (12)
2.3 Based on the public interest score calculated above, identify what type of assurance is required for
this entity and justify your answer (2)
The IFAC’s code of professional conduct requires professional accountants to identify threats that could
negatively impact on fundamental principles. Such threats should then be addressed by putting
safeguards in place. The IFAC’s code of professional conduct categorises possible threats into five broad
categories.
REQUIRED:
3.1 List the five fundamental principles found in the Code of Professional Conduct. (5)
3.2 Identify what the Committee for Auditing Standards needs to assist the Independent Regulatory
Board of Auditors with. (3)
3.3 Which individuals does the Code of Professional Conduct apply to? Provide a definition for each
individual. (4)
3.4 Identify three (3) safeguards that exist in the work environment. (3)
3.5 For each of the following scenarios, identify (where applicable) the type of threat the scenario
represents and suggest a possible safeguard to either reduce the threat to an acceptable level or to
eliminate it completely.
3.5.1 Agrizzzz (Pty) Ltd has asked Bo-Saas, its audit firm, to allow three of its trainee accountants
to assist with some finance duties in the accounting department for two months. (2)
3.5.2 Vroom Vroom is a trainee accountant for the audit of Nitbank. Vroom Vroom applied for
a loan at Nitbank to finance the purchase of his home. The loan granted to Vroom Vroom
by Nitbank is based on normal terms and conditions. (1)
3.5.3 PMC is an audit firm. Nelly Khumalo, a partner at PMC, has been the partner who signs
the audit report of Forever Check (Pty) Ltd for eight years (2)
[The end]
Page 4 of 4
AIC22A2 – Test 1 - 2019
MEMORANDUM
Auditing Postulates
1. No necessary conflict of interest exists between the auditor and management / employees of the
enterprise under audit (both the client and the auditor have the same objective with regard to
fair presentation)
2. An auditor must act exclusively as auditor in order to be able to offer an independent and
objective opinion on the fair presentation of financial information
3. The professional status of the independent auditor imposes commensurate professional
obligations
4. Financial data and information are verifiable
5. Internal controls reduce the probability of errors and irregularities
6. Application of generally accepted accounting practice results in fair presentation
7. That which held true in the past will hold true in the future (in the absence of any contrary
evidence)
8. The financial statements submitted to the auditor for verification are free of collusive and other
unusual irregularities
An auditor can provide assurance and non-assurance work only if the non-assurance services
are deemed to be insignificant relative to the assurance work
This is linked to the postulate that states an auditor needs to act exclusively in the capacity of an
auditor in order to be able to offer an independent and objective opinion on the fair presentation
of financial information as well as to remain independent in appearance and mind at all times.
The audit committee is required to approve any non-audit work which the auditor of the
company is engaged to perform. This can be seen to be an attempt to focus the auditor’s
attention on performing the audit, not on providing other services.
The audit committee must be satisfied that the auditor is independent and must state whether
they are satisfied with the audit of the annual financial statements.
Page 5 of 4
AIC22A2 – Test 1 - 2019
QUESTION 1.3 – Solution (Maximum 5 marks)
An auditor cannot issue absolute assurance because of the following limitations that exist in an audit
:
The nature of financial reporting. In the preparation of financial statements, management
must apply judgement in applying the relevant reporting framework, and financial statements
contain many account balances which are subjective
The nature of audit procedures. There are practical and legal limitations on the auditor’s
ability to obtain audit evidence. There is always the possibility that management may not
provide complete information that is relevant to the preparation of the financial statements, and
accordingly the auditor cannot be certain that all relevant information has been received. Audit
procedures are not designed specifically to detect fraud, and by collusion or falsification of
documentation, and other means of circumventing controls carried out by management,
fraudulent transactions may go undetected and the auditor may believe that evidence is valid
when it is not.
Audit evidence is usually persuasive rather than conclusive. For example, an auditor is
“persuaded” that an event or transaction took place by the presence of documents or information
provided by management, rather than by actually witnessing the event. The documentation could
be false, and the information provided by management untrue. It is obviously impossible for
the auditor to “witness” every transaction
The use of testing. On a similar note the auditor cannot examine every single transaction which
has taken place in the business due to financial and time constraints, therefore it is necessary
to “test” check i.e. perform procedures on only a sample of transactions and balances. Once the
auditor “test checks”, he cannot state that everything is 100% correct, only a reasoned opinion
based on the sample on which procedures were undertaken, can be given.
The inherent limitations of accounting and internal control systems. The auditor is obliged
to place reliance on the systems which the client has put in place to provide financial information;
these systems have inherent limitations which may result in the failure to detect errors or fraud
and hence the information on which the auditor forms an opinion, may be flawed.
Timeliness of financial reporting and the balance between benefit and cost. To be of any
value the audit opinion must be reported within a reasonable time after the financial year-end,
and the benefit derived from the audit must exceed the cost. To meet these practical
requirements will generally lead to some compromise in the audit, but it is compromise which
users understand and accept
Other matters that affect the inherent limitations of an audit. There are frequently aspects of
the audit or assertions in the financial statements which are inherently difficult for the auditor to
gather sufficient appropriate evidence and which compound the limitations of the audit.
Page 6 of 4
AIC22A2 – Test 1 - 2019
A public interest score is used to determine whether an entity is required to have their annual financial
statements audited or not or
A public interest score is used to determine whether the level of assurance that is required for an entity
Page 7 of 4
AIC22A2 – Test 1 - 2019
Public interest Max
Calculation Justification
score component marks
R50,000,000. The R55,000,000 is irrelevant in
this question because it relates to the 2019
financial year and the public interest score
calculation is for the 2018 financial year
Shareholders 1 point is awarded for every individual who 4
has a direct or indirect beneficial interest in the marks
company’s shares.
Limited/Review assurance
This is because the public interest score is 128 points and the financial statements were compiled by an
external or third party being Book-Keep-It (Pty) Ltd . The fact that the Book-Keep-It (Pty) Ltd is
owned by the former CFO is irrelevant
Page 8 of 4
AIC22A2 – Test 1 - 2019
QUESTION 3.1 – Solution (Maximum 5 marks)
Integrity
Objectivity
Confidentiality
Professional Behavior
Professional competence and due care
Leadership of the firm that stresses the importance of compliance with the fundamental principles
Policies and procedures to implement and monitor quality control on engagements
Documentary evidence that “ethical” threats were identified, evaluated and responded to in respect
of an engagement
Policies and procedures designed to identify interests or relationships between the client and
Page 9 of 4
AIC22A2 – Test 1 - 2019
members of the engagement team, e.g. questionnaires to be completed by team members
A disciplinary mechanism to promote compliance and deal with transgressions of the fundamental
principles
Having the engagement teams work subjected to independent review by say, a partner not
otherwise involved with the engagement
Rotating senior assurance team personnel
A company has sound procedures which protect an employee (a chartered accountant in business)
from intimidatory threats from the employee’s manager.
Threat: Self-review and potential familiarity threat as trainees become friendly with client
accounting staff.
Safeguards:
o Trainees should not make any “management” decisions.
o Trainees should not exercise discretionary authority to commit the client, e.g. sign a
purchase order or write off a bad debt.
o Trainees should not be assigned to the audit. This will be particularly effective in
addressing any familiarity threat.
Page 10 of 4