Ch 2 Collection of Data_79ef8086-7ada-4bc5-b00c-c77680143f02
Ch 2 Collection of Data_79ef8086-7ada-4bc5-b00c-c77680143f02
Collection of Data
Sources of Collection of Data
Information through
Personal Questionnaires and Telephonic
Interviews Interviews
Schedules
Reliability of data is
Data have a high Data are accurate not doubted
degree of when personally because data is
Originality. collected. collected by the
investigator himself.
Related
Uniformity Elastic
Information 4 5 6
Demerits
2. Personal Bias
This method is prone to personal bias of the
investigator. So, the data may loose its credibility.
3. Costly
This method is expensive in terms of time, money
and efforts involved.
4. Limited Coverage
In this method, area of investigation is generally
small. So, results are less representative and leads
to wrong conclusions.
2. Indirect Oral Investigation:
It is the method by which information is obtained not
from the persons regarding whom the information is
required. It is collected orally from other persons who are
expected to possess the necessary information. These
persons are called witnesses.
Suitability
Free from
4 Simple 5
Bias
Demerits
1. Less Accurate
Data collected by this method is less accurate. It is
because information is collected from other
persons than the concerned respondents.
2. Biased
There is possibility of the personal bias of the
witnesses giving information.
3. Doubtful Conclusions
This method may lead to doubtful conclusions
due to carelessness of the witnesses.
Difference between Direct Personal Investigation
and Indirect Oral Investigation
This method is
particularly suitable
for some special-
purpose
investigations.
Suitable for
Special Purpose 4
Demerits
1. Lack of Originality
There is lack of originality because there is the lack of
personal contact with the respondents.
2. Lack of Uniformity
There is lack of uniformity of data because data is
collected by a number of correspondents.
3. Personal Bias
This method suffers from the personal bias of the
correspondents.
4. Less Accurate
Data collected by this method are not very accurate.
4. Delay in Collection
There is a delay in the collection of information by
this method.
Information through Questionnaires & Schedules
Under this method, the investigator prepares a
questionnaire keeping in view the objective of the
enquiry.
Mailing
Mailing
(Questionnaire)
(Questionnaire)
Surveys
Surveys
Enumerator’s
Enumerator’s
Method
Method
1. Mailing (Questionnaire) Surveys:
• Under this method, questionnaires are mailed to the
respondents. The respondents note the answers against
the questions and return the completed questionnaire
to the investigator.
• A letter is attached with the questionnaire giving the
purpose of the investigation.
Suitability
1 2 3
Wide
Economical Original
Coverage
This method is This method is This method
economical in original because allows wide
terms of time, information is coverage of the
money and supplied by the area of study.
efforts involved. concerned
persons
themselves.
Demerits
Lack of Interest : Generally, the respondents do not take interest in
1 questionnaire and fail to return the questionnaires. Sometimes, they
send incomplete answers.
Lack of Flexibility : This method lacks flexibility. When the questions are
2 not properly replied, these cannot be changed to obtain the required
information.
Limited Use : This method has limited use because the questionnaires can
3 be answered only by the educated respondents. This method cannot be
used when the respondents are uneducated.
Impartiality 4 Completeness
5
Demerits
1. Expensive 2. Availability of Enumerators
This method is very
It is difficult to find competent
expensive because of
enumerators. Accuracy depends on
involvement of trained
competency of the enumerators.
enumerators.
5. Partial
4. Open Questions
In such questions, the respondent is requested to give his
views on specific issues.
Telephonic Interviews
Under this method, the investigator seeks the desired
information from the respondents over the telephone.
Merits :
1. Originality
2. Accuracy
3. Reliability
4. Cheaper (Economical)
5. Respondents are free from personal embarrassment
Demerits :
1. Personal Bias : This method is prone to personal bias of
the investigator. So, the data may loose its credibility.
Reports and
Census of India Reports and
Census of India Publications of
Publications of
National Sample
National Sample
Survey Office
Survey Office
(NSSO)
(NSSO)
Census of India