Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization - Concepts and Cases, 14e 14th Edition Michael A. Hitt 2024 scribd download
Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization - Concepts and Cases, 14e 14th Edition Michael A. Hitt 2024 scribd download
com
https://ebookmass.com/product/strategic-management-
competitiveness-and-globalization-concepts-and-
cases-14e-14th-edition-michael-a-hitt/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD NOW
https://ebookmass.com/product/strategic-management-concepts-and-cases-
competitiveness-and-globalization-13e-13th-edition-michael-a-hitt/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/etextbook-978-1305502147-strategic-
management-concepts-and-cases-competitiveness-and-globalization/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/strategic-management-concepts-
competitiveness-and-globalization-12th-edition-ebook-pdf/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/escaping-valentines-day-barth/
ebookmass.com
Famine: Its Causes, Effects and Management John R. K.
Robson
https://ebookmass.com/product/famine-its-causes-effects-and-
management-john-r-k-robson/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/mediation-negotiation-by-other-
moves-1st-edition-alain-lempereur/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/commodification-and-its-discontents-1st-
edition-nicholas-abercrombie/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/encyclopedia-of-renewable-and-
sustainable-materials-imtiaz-ahmed-choudhury/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/les-aveux-john-wainwright-wainwright/
ebookmass.com
Loose Leaf for Music: An Appreciation, Brief 10th Brief
Edition Roger Kamien
https://ebookmass.com/product/loose-leaf-for-music-an-appreciation-
brief-10th-brief-edition-roger-kamien/
ebookmass.com
14e
Strategic Management
Competitiveness & Globalization
Hitt • Ireland
Hoskisson • Harrison
Strategic Management
Competitiveness & Globalization
Concepts and Cases
14e
Michael A. Hitt
Texas A&M University
R. Duane Ireland
Texas A&M University
Robert E. Hoskisson
Rice University
Jeffrey S. Harrison
University of Richmond
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
This is an electronic version of the print textbook. Due to electronic rights restrictions,
some third party content may be suppressed. Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed
content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. The publisher reserves the right
to remove content from this title at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. For
valuable information on pricing, previous editions, changes to current editions, and alternate
formats, please visit www.cengage.com/highered to search by ISBN#, author, title, or keyword for
materials in your areas of interest.
Important Notice: Media content referenced within the product description or the product
text may not be available in the eBook version.
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Strategic Management: Competitiveness & Copyright © 2024 Cengage Learning, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Globalization: Concepts and Cases, WCN: 02-300
14th Edition No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced
Michael A. Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, Robert E.
or distributed in any form or by any means, except as permitted by U.S.
Hoskisson, Jeffrey S. Harrison
copyright law, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.
SVP, Product: Cheryl Costantini
Unless otherwise noted, all content is Copyright © Cengage Learning, Inc.
VP, Product: Thais Alencar
The names of all products mentioned herein are used for identification
Portfolio Product Director: Joe Sabatino
purposes only and may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their
Senior Portfolio Product Manager: Mike Worls respective owners. Cengage Learning disclaims any affiliation, association,
Product Assistant: Vanessa Leahr connection with, sponsorship, or endorsement by such owners.
Senior Learning Designer: Courtney Wolstoncroft Previous Editions: © 2020, © 2017, © 2015
Senior Content Manager: Meaghan Tomaso
Digital Project Manager: Beth Ross For product information and technology assistance, contact us at
VP, Product Marketing: Jason Sakos Cengage Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706
or support.cengage.com.
Associate Director, Product Marketing:
Mary Reynolds
For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all
Executive Product Marketing Manager: requests online at www.copyright.com.
John Carey
Cengage
200 Pier 4 Boulevard
Boston, MA 02210
USA
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
To Frankie: You are my partner in life. I love you and look forward to our
future together.
—Michael
To Mary Ann: We have reached that place we want to go and we will now
walk in the sun. I love you.
—Duane
To Kathy: You are the best and my love for you is eternal. Thanks for all
the support and love you’ve given me and our children throughout our life
together.
—Robert
To Marie: You are my best friend, eternal companion, and greatest supporter.
I love you forever.
—Jeff
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Brief Contents
Preface, xiv
About the Authors, xviii
iv
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Contents
Preface xiv
About the Authors xviii
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
vi Contents
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Contents vii
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
viii Contents
6-4 Value-Creating Diversification: Related Constrained and Related Linked Diversification 144
6-4a Operational Relatedness: Sharing Activities 145
6-4b Corporate Relatedness: Transferring of Core Competencies 146
6-4c Market Power 147
6-4d Vertical Integration 147
6-4e Simultaneous Operational Relatedness and Corporate Relatedness 148
6-5 Value Creation through Unrelated Diversification 149
6-5a Efficient Internal Capital Market Allocation 149
Strategic Focus: Fanatics Builds a Portfolio of Related Businesses 150
6-5b Restructuring of Assets 151
6-6 Incentives Driving Value-Neutral Diversification 152
6-6a Antitrust Regulation 152
6-6b Tax Laws 153
6-6c Low Performance 153
6-6d Uncertain Future Cash Flows and Reduced Risk of Failure 154
6-7 Managerial Motives to Diversify 154
Summary 157 ●
Key Terms 157 ●
Review Questions 158 ●
Mini-Case 158 ●
Notes 159
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Contents ix
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
x Contents
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Contents xi
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xii Contents
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Contents xiii
Case 16: Developing a Sustainable Ecosystem Community: The Port of Antwerp C-184
Case 17: Re: Build Manufacturing—Reimagining the Conglomerate C-189
Case 18: Uber: The Turbulent Rise of “Everyone’s Private Driver” C-200
Case 19: Digital Transformation at The Washington Post: Innovating for the Next Generation C-216
Case 20: Driving Waymo’s Fully Autonomous Future C-230
Case 21: Wellington Brewery: Growth Decision in a Crowded Beer Market C-240
Case 22: WeWork: But Does the Corporate Governance Work? C-249
Glossary G-1
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Preface
Our goal in writing each edition of this book is to present a new, up-to-date standard for explain-
ing the strategic management process. To reach this goal with the fourteenth edition of our
market-leading text, we again present you with an intellectually rich yet thoroughly practical
analysis of strategic management.
Before we began working on this new edition, we had a series of meetings in which we created
a comprehensive list of topics that needed to be added or revised significantly because of monu-
mental changes in the global business, social, technological, and political environments over the
recent past, as well as developments in the academic and practitioner literatures pertaining to
strategic management. After creating the list, we thoroughly examined these literatures, which led
us to research articles from journals published on six continents and a wide assortment of articles
published in the popular business press (e.g., Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg Businessweek, Fortune,
Financial Times, and Forbes, to name a few) and in reliable social media outlets (i.e., blogs associ-
ated with professional organizations).
The goal was to ensure that the material in the book is accurate, interesting, and reflects the
most important developments in the business world. This process resulted in the inclusion of 1,507
references to works published since the last edition went to press (485 in 2022; 567 in 2021; 305 in
2020; 153 in 2019).
Examining a wide array of sources provided many valuable examples of how companies across
the world are using (or not using) the strategic management process. Though many of the hun-
dreds of companies discussed in the book will be familiar to you, some will likely be new. One
reason for this diversity is that the book contains examples of companies from around the world
to demonstrate the globalized nature of business operations. Some of these firms are fairly large
and known by many, while others are small and known primarily to the customers they serve. To
facilitate learning, the book uses an Analysis-Strategy-Performance framework; we explain this
framework in Chapter 1 and reference it throughout the book.
Several characteristics of this fourteenth edition are designed to enhance your learning
experience:
● First, this book presents you with the most comprehensive and thorough coverage of strategic
management available in the market.
● The research used in this book includes “classics” as well as the most recent contributions
to strategic management literature. The historically significant classic research provides the
foundation for much of what we know about strategic management, while the most recent
contributions reveal insights about how to use strategic management effectively in the com-
plex, global business environment in which firms compete. Although the relevant theory and
current research are the foundation for this book, it also is strongly application oriented and
presents you with numerous examples and applications of strategic management concepts,
techniques, and tools. This edition, for example, uses more than 600 companies to illustrate
strategic management in action. Collectively, no other strategic management book presents
you with the combination of useful and insightful research and applications in diverse organi-
zations as does this text.
● Examples you will find in this edition include large U.S.-based firms such as Tesla, Meta
Platforms, BlackRock, Costco, Apple, McDonald’s, FedEx, Starbucks, Walmart, Walt Disney,
General Electric, Intel, Coca-Cola, Netflix, Tupperware, Shaw Industries, Instacart, Harley-
Davidson, Patagonia, Publix, Peloton, Kroger, Campbell Soup, Fanatics, Frontier Airlines,
Accenture, Pfizer, Google, Target, UPS, Bed Bath & Beyond, and many more.
● In addition, examples of firms based in countries other than the United States include Toshiba,
Airbus, Sony, Carrefour, Softbank, Nestlé, Piclo Flex, Tata Group, Rio Tinto Group, Unilever,
IKEA, Komatsu, Toyota, Aldi, Honda, Groupe Limagrain, Alibaba, Lenovo, Volkswagen, and
Samsung. As these lists suggest, the firms this book examines compete in a wide range of
industries and produce a diverse set of goods and services.
xiv
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Preface xv
● The ideas of many prominent scholars are included in this book, including Ron Adner,
Rajshree Agarwal, Ruth Aguilera, Gautam Ahuja, Raffi Amit, Africa Arino, Jay Barney, Paul
Beamish, Peter Buckley, Alfred Chandler, Ming-Jer Chen, Russ Coff, Brian Connelly, Rich
D’Aveni, Kathy Eisenhardt, Nicolas Foss, Edward Freeman, Gerry George, Javier Gimeno, Luis
Gomez-Mejia, Melissa Graebner, Ranjay Gulati, Don Hambrick, Joseph Harrison, Connie
Helfat, Amy Hillman, Tomas Hult, Tom Jones, Dave Ketchen, Ryan Krause, Dovev Lavie,
Haiyang, Li, Yadong Luo, Shige Makino, Costas Markides, Anita McGahan, Danny Miller, Will
Mitchell, Margie Peteraf, Michael Porter, Nandini Rajagopalan, Jeff Reuer, Joan Ricart, Richard
Rumelt, Wei Shi, David Sirmon, Ken Smith, Steve Tallman, David Teece, Rosalie Tung, Michael
Tushman, Eero Vaara, Margarethe Wiersema, Oliver Williamson, Mike Wright, Anthea Zhang,
Shaker Zahara, and Ed Zajac, among many others.
In addition to the book’s characteristics, let us highlight some specific features and revisions:
● New Opening Cases and Strategic Focus Segments Almost all of the Opening Cases and Stra-
tegic Focus segments are new! A very few were updated completely because of their continuing
relevance and importance. Many of these application-oriented features deal with companies
located outside North America. In addition, the company-specific examples included in each
chapter are either new or were checked for their continuing relevance and accuracy.
● Twenty-two New Cases are included in this edition. Offering an effective mix of organizations
headquartered or based in North America and several other countries as well, the cases deal
with contemporary and highly important strategic management topics. Many of the cases have
full financial data. These timely cases present active learners with opportunities to apply the
strategic management process and understand organizational conditions and contexts and to
make appropriate recommendations to deal with critical concerns. These cases also appear in
MindTap (see description below).
● New Mini-Cases appear at the end of each chapter. These cases describe how companies deal
with major issues the text highlights. The book includes 13 of these cases, one for each chapter,
although some of them can overlap with other chapter content. Students will like their concise-
ness, but they likewise provide rich content that can serve as a catalyst for individual or group
analysis and class discussion. A set of questions, which guide analysis and discussion, follows
each Mini-Case.
● Completely new or expanded content appears in all of the chapters to reflect the many changes
currently taking place in strategic management. Much of this content pertains to ideas found in
more than one chapter. Consequently, you will find in the book a continuing, integrated thread
for these topics, with references back to the place they were mentioned or defined initially.
Chapter 1 introduces many of the new concepts because it lays a foundation for the rest of the
book; however, most of them receive thorough treatment in a later chapter. Examples of this
content, and the chapters in which it can be found, include:
● Corporate social responsibility (CSR), sustainability, ESG, and greenwashing (Chapters 1,
2, 6, 8–13)
● Nonmarket strategies and social capital (Chapters 2, 3, 5)
● Ecosystems, platform strategies, multi-party alliances, and coopetition (Chapters 2, 5, 9)
● Deglobalization and protectionism (Chapters 1, 8)
● Digitalization, digital strategies, big data, and the metaverse (Chapters 1, 2, 4–9, 13)
● Benefit corporations and B-Corp certification (Chapters 2, 10)
● Stakeholder perspective and stakeholder-oriented strategic management (Chapters 1, 6,
10, 12)
● Global supply chains and global value chains (Chapters 1, 8)
● Cryptocurrencies and blockchain (Chapters 2, 13)
● Artificial intelligence (Chapters 1, 3)
● Digital platform organizations and structure (Chapters 4, 8, 11)
● Cross-border learning (Chapter 8)
● Inflation (Chapters 2, 8)
● Global conflict and war (Chapters 2, 8)
● Global pandemic, COVID-19 (Chapters 1–5, 8)
● Activist investors and investor “wolf-packs” (Chapters 6, 7, 10)
● Strategic human capital (Chapters 3, 4)
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xvi Preface
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Preface xvii
It is not our intention to suggest that all exercises should be used for every chapter. Strategic
management is taught at both undergraduate and graduate levels, and therefore, we offer a vari-
ety of pedagogically designed activities with numerous challenge levels so that instructors can
customize MindTap to best suit their teaching style and the course objectives. That said, we have
been highly intentional in designing a MindTap learning path that scaffolds learners through the
content and offers a multi-modal experience to serve learners of varying preferences and levels.
We have found that our interactive approach to teaching strategic management appeals to stu-
dents. It also greatly improves the quality of their learning experience. Our approach is more fully
discussed in the Instructor’s Resource Manual.
Acknowledgments
We express our appreciation for the excellent support received from our editorial and production
team at Cengage. We especially wish to thank Mike Worls, Senior Portfolio Product Manager;
Courtney Wolstoncroft, Anterior Learning Designer; and Meaghan Tomaso, our Senior Content
Manager. We are grateful for their dedication, commitment, and outstanding contributions to the
development and publication of this book and its package of support materials.
Michael A. Hitt
R. Duane Ireland
Robert E. Hoskisson
Jeffrey S. Harrison
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
About the
Authors
Michael A. Hitt
Michael A. Hitt is a University Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Texas A&M University. Dr. Hitt
received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado. He has co-authored or co-edited 28 books and
authored or co-authored many journal articles. A recent article listed him as one of the 10 most cited
authors in management over a 25-year period. The Times Higher Education 2010 listed him among
the top scholars in economics, finance, and management based on the number of highly cited articles
he has authored. A recent article in the Academy of Management Perspectives lists him as one of the
top two management scholars in terms of the combined impact of his work both inside (i.e., citations
in scholarly journals) and outside of academia. And, a recent article in the Academy of Management
Learning and Education lists him as the highest cited author in strategic management textbooks. He
has served on the editorial review boards of multiple journals and is a former editor of the Academy
of Management Journal, a former co-editor of the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal and a former
editor-in-chief of Oxford Research Encyclopedia. He is a fellow in the Academy of Management, the
Strategic Management Society, and the Academy of International Business. He has received honorary
doctorates (Doctor Honoris Causa) from the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and from Jonkoping
University. He is a former president of both the Academy of Management and the Strategic Man-
agement Society. He received awards for the best article published in the Academy of Management
Executive (1999), Academy of Management Journal (2000), Journal of Management (2006), and Family
Business Review (2012). He has received the Irwin Outstanding Educator Award, the Career Achieve-
ment Award for Distinguished Service, and the Career Award for Distinguished Educator from the
Academy of Management. He received Distinguished Alumnus Awards from Texas Tech University
and from the University of Colorado in 2018. In 2014–2022, Dr. Hitt has been listed as a Thomson
Reuters Highly Cited Researcher (a listing of the world’s most influential researchers).
R. Duane Ireland
R. Duane Ireland is a University Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Mays Business School, Texas
A&M University, where he held the Benton Cocanougher Chair in Business. Previously, he served
Mays in various leadership roles, including those of Head of the Department of Management,
executive associate dean, acting dean, and interim dean. He taught strategic management courses
at all educational levels. He has more than 200 publications, including approximately 25 books.
His research, which focuses on diversification, innovation, corporate entrepreneurship, strate-
gic entrepreneurship, and the informal economy, appears in an array of journals. He served as a
member of multiple editorial review boards and is a former editor (and a former associate editor)
of the Academy of Management Journal. He is also a former Consulting Editor for the Academy
of Management Executive. He has been a guest editor for 13 special issues of journals. He is a past
president of the Academy of Management. Dr. Ireland is a fellow of the Academy of Management,
a fellow of the Strategic Management Society, and a research fellow in the Global Consortium of
Entrepreneurship Centers. A recent article in the Academy of Management Learning and Education
lists him as among the most highly cited authors in strategic management textbooks. He received
awards for the best article published in Academy of Management Executive (1999), the Academy of
Management Journal (2000), and the Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship (2010).
He received an Association of Former Students Distinguished Achievement Award for Research
from Texas A&M University (2012). In 2014, 2015, 2017 and 2018, and 2020 Thomson Reuters
identified Dr. Ireland as a Thomson Reuters Highly Cited Researcher (a listing of the world’s most
influential researchers). He received a Distinguished Service award from the Academy of Manage-
ment in 2017 and a Distinguished Service award from the strategic management division of the
Academy of Management in the same year. The Rawls College of Business, Texas Tech University
xviii
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
About the Authors xix
chose him as a Distinguished Alumnus in 2017. Also in 2017, he received the Lifetime Achievement
Award for Research and Scholarship from Mays Business School.
Robert E. Hoskisson
Robert E. Hoskisson is the George R. Brown Emeritus Chair of Strategic Management at the Jesse
H. Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University. Dr. Hoskisson received his Ph.D. from the
University of California-Irvine. His research topics focus on corporate governance, acquisitions
and divestitures, corporate and international diversification, and cooperative strategy. He teaches
courses in corporate and international strategic management, cooperative strategy, and strategy
consulting. He has co-authored 34 books, including a recent book entitled “Understanding and
Managing Strategic Governance” (with Wei Shi, 2021). Dr. Hoskisson has served on several edito-
rial boards for such publications as the Strategic Management Journal (Associate Editor), Academy
of Management Journal (Consulting Editor), Journal of International Business Studies (Consulting
Editor), Journal of Management (Associate Editor), Organization Science, Journal of Management
Studies (Special Issue Guest Editor). His research has appeared in over 130 publications, including
the Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management
Review, Organization Science, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Perspectives, Acad-
emy of Management Executive, Journal of Management Studies, Journal of International Business
Studies, Journal of Business Venturing, Leadership Quarterly, Organization Studies, Strategic Man-
agement Review, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, California Management Review, and Jour-
nal of World Business. A recent article in the Academy of Management Learning and Education lists
him among the most highly cited authors in strategic management textbooks. He is listed in the
Thomson Reuters Highly Cited Researcher list that catalogues the world’s most influential research
scholars. Dr. Hoskisson is a fellow of the Academy of Management and a charter member of the
Academy of Management Journal’s Hall of Fame. He is also a fellow of the Strategic Management
Society and has received awards from the American Society for Competitiveness and the William
G. Dyer Alumni award from the Marriott School of Management, Brigham Young University. He
completed three years of service as a Representative-at-Large on the Board of Governors of the
Academy of Management. He also served as President of the Strategic Management Society, and
served on the Executive Committee of its Board of Directors for six years.
Jeffrey S. Harrison
Jeffrey S. Harrison is a University Distinguished Educator, University Distinguished Scholar, and
the W. David Robbins Chair of Strategic Management at the Robins School of Business, University
of Richmond. He is also a recipient of the Virginia State Council of Higher Education (SCHEV)
Outstanding Faculty Award. Prior to his current appointment he served as the Fred G. Peelen
Professor of Global Hospitality Strategy at Cornell University. His Ph.D. in Strategic Management
is from the University of Utah. Dr. Harrison’s research interests include stakeholder theory and
strategic management. His work has been published in high impact academic journals such as
Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review,
Journal of Management, Journal of Management Studies, Business Ethics Quarterly, and Journal of
Business Ethics. He has published thirteen books (on his own or with co-authors). Dr. Harrison
currently serves as editor of the Stakeholder Strategy Section of the Journal of Business Ethics and
on several editorial boards, including Strategic Management Journal and Business Ethics Quarterly.
He has served as an editor for special issues at several journals, including Academy of Management
Journal, Academy of Management Review, Business & Society, and Academy of Management Per-
spectives. He also served as chair of the Stakeholder Strategy Interest Group at the Strategic Man-
agement Society, a group he helped organize. He has co-organized several conferences in North
America and Europe that have attracted experts from dozens of nations. In addition, Dr. Harrison
has provided consulting and executive training services to many organizations in the U.S. and
South America on a wide range of strategic, entrepreneurial, and other business issues. His clients
have included Lockheed Martin, Siemens Westinghouse, American Express, Southdown, Volvo,
DuPont, Multiple Sclerosis Society, and many others.
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xx
Social/
Manu Food/ Internet/ International Ethical Industry
Case Title facturing Service Retail High Tech Comm. Perspective Issues Information COVID-19
Airbus A380 X X X X
Air France-KLM X X X
Ant Group X X X X
Aventiv
X X X
Technologies
Blue Apron X X X
Gap X X X X X
Haier X X X
Hershey X X X
Hilton X X X
JIO/Facebook X X X
Marriott X X X X
Meta X X X X X
Netflix X X X
Pacari Chocolate X X X X
Port of Antwerp X X X
Re: Build
X
Manufacturing
Uber X X X X X
Washington Post X X
Waymo X X X X
Wellington
X X X
Brewery
We Work X X
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xxi
Ch Ch Ch Ch
Case Title Ch 1 Ch 2 Ch 3 Ch 4 Ch 5 Ch 6 Ch 7 Ch 8 Ch 9 10 11 12 13
Airbus A380 X X X
Air France-KLM X X X
Ant Group X X X X
Aventiv
X X X X
Technologies
Blue Apron X X X
Gap X X X X X X
Haier X X X X
Hershey X X X X
Hilton X X X X
JIO/Facebook X X
Marriott X X X X
Meta X X X X X
Netflix X X X X
Pacari Chocolate X X X X X
Port of Antwerp X X
Re: Build
X X X X
Manufacturing
Uber X X X X X
Washington Post X X X X
Waymo X X X X
Wellington
X X X
Brewery
We Work X X X
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1
Strategic Management and
Strategic Competitiveness
Learning Objectives
Studying this chapter should provide you with the strategic
management knowledge needed to:
1-1 Define strategic competitiveness, strategy, competitive advantage,
above-average returns, and the strategic management process.
1-2 Describe the competitive landscape and explain how globalization,
technological changes, and expectations of socially responsible
behavior shape it.
1-3 Use the industrial organization (I/O) model to explain how firms can
earn above-average returns.
1-4 Use the resource-based model to explain how firms can earn above-
average returns.
1-5 Use the stakeholder model to explain how firms can earn above-
average returns.
1-6 Describe vision, mission, and values, and explain why they are important.
1-7 Describe strategic leaders and what they do.
1-8 Explain the strategic management process.
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Hertz Has a Wild Ride
The Hertz Corporation, now a subsidiary of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., began its car
rental operations under the leadership of Walter Jacobs with a dozen Ford Model
T cars in Chicago in 1918. Called Rent-a-Car, Inc., the company grew rapidly and
was purchased by John D. Hertz, owner of Yellow Truck and Coach Manufacturing
Company, in 1923. He re-named the company Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System. After three
years, the rental car brand was sold to General Motors, which sold the brand back to
John Hertz in 1953. The company’s stock began trading on the New York Stock Ex-
change in 1954. Over the years the company has been owned, in addition to General
Motors, by Radio Corporation of America, UAL Corporation (later known as Allegis),
Ford Motor Company, and a consortium of private equity firms, which ultimately took
the company public again in 2006.
In spite of, or perhaps because of, all the changes in ownership, Hertz has a
history of innovation. It was the first company to offer a rental charge card, the first
to offer one-way rentals, and the first international car rental company to expand
into China. In addition, the company partnered with auto manufacturers to develop
and rent specialty cars for its fleet, including a Ford GT350H Mustang and a modified
Chevrolet Corvette
ZH-Z coupe. Hertz
was an early inno-
vator in self-service
car rental kiosks and
hourly car rentals.
The company also
grew through devel-
oping a new brand,
Advantage Rent-A-
Car, and through the
acquisition of Dollar
Thrifty Automotive
Group, after which
Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock.com
makes the cars very attractive to customers and reduces maintenance costs. When they
sell the cars, because the cars have low mileage and were purchased at a discount, car
rental companies are able to recoup most or all of the original purchase prices. However,
this business model makes car rental companies vulnerable to steep losses if used car
prices decline. Car rental companies are also vulnerable to shifts in tourist travel.
3
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4
Both sources of vulnerability became evident when the COVID-19 pandemic hit the global
economy. Tourism dropped to almost nothing, which especially hurt car rental companies
as well as airlines and hotels. In addition, there was a drop in demand for used cars, which
made selling its fleet difficult. Hertz cut jobs and sold a lot of its fleet in an attempt to pay
creditors and remain solvent. The company’s sales shrank 46 percent from 2019 to 2020, and
the company lost nearly $2 billion. In May 2020, the company was forced to file for Chapter 11
bankruptcy to provide some temporary relief from creditors and buy some time to restructure
its debt and its operations. At one point, Hertz shares were selling for under a dollar.
In May of 2021, a group of investors won a bidding contest in bankruptcy court for
control of the company, with a plan to modernize the company’s technology and improve
customer service. They arranged to have a new issue of Hertz stock begin trading in early
July, the day after the company exited bankruptcy. Then, in the summer of 2021, good for-
tune smiled on Hertz. With many COVID-19 travel restrictions being lifted, tourism increased
dramatically. The car rental industry was not prepared for it. Demand outstripped supply of
rental cars, and it was not unusual for vacationers to pay $275 per day for a SUV in popular
locations; $100-per-day rentals on regular cars were common. The restructuring had dra-
matically reduced Hertz’s debt burden, so they were well positioned to take advantage of
the uptick in demand.
As Hertz rebounds, innovation is taking front stage again. The company is buying
100,000 electric cars from Tesla for its fleet. It also has a partnership with Uber Technolo-
gies focused on autonomous driving and the possibility of developing robotaxi networks. The
company wants to play a large role in the modern mobility ecosystem (all the firms that carry
out interdependent activities that provide mobility to customers). In an amazing turnaround
of fortunes, Barron’s identified Hertz as one of its 10 top stocks for investment in 2022.
Sources: C. English, 2022, Hertz stock could take off this year. Here’s why, Barron’s, www.barrons.com, January 7; 2022, Financials for
Hertz Global Holdings Inc., Barrons, www.barrons.com, January 26; 2020, Hertz Global Holdings Annual Report; A. Bary, 2021, Here are
Barron’s 10 top stocks for the new year, Barrons, www.barrons.com, December 27; A. Bary, 2021, Reorganized Hertz puts investors
in driver’s seat, Barrons, www.barrons.com, June 28; K. G. Pringle, 2021, Hertz could revolutionize rental cars once again, Barrons,
www.barrons.com, November 10.
Learning Objective
1-1 An Overview of Strategy and Strategic
1-1 Define strategic
competitiveness, Competitiveness
strategy, competitive
As the Opening Case demonstrates, achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in a vol-
advantage, above-
average returns, and the atile global economy is indeed challenging. Intense competition among a small group of industry
strategic management leaders, dependence on tourism, and changing technologies are all strong forces in the auto rental
process. industry. A shock like the COVID-19 pandemic had an especially large negative impact on the
industry, but what is most fascinating is that lifting travel restrictions also unleashed strong posi-
Firms achieve strategic
competitiveness by
tive forces that allowed the industry, and Hertz, to recover.
successfully formulating Firms achieve strategic competitiveness by successfully formulating and implementing a value-
and implementing a value creating strategy. A strategy is an integrated and coordinated set of commitments and actions
creating strategy. designed to exploit core competencies and gain a competitive advantage. When choosing a strat-
A strategy is an integrated egy, firms make choices among competing alternatives as the pathway for deciding how they will
and coordinated set of pursue strategic competitiveness. In this sense, the chosen strategy indicates what the firm will do
commitments and actions
designed to exploit core
as well as what the firm will not do.
competencies and gain a A firm has a competitive advantage when, by implementing a chosen strategy, it creates supe-
competitive advantage. rior value for customers, and when competitors are not able to imitate the value the firm’s prod-
A firm has a competitive ucts create or find it too expensive to attempt imitation.1 An organization can be confident that
advantage when, by its strategy yields a competitive advantage after competitors’ efforts to duplicate it have ceased or
implementing a chosen failed. In addition, firms must understand that no competitive advantage is permanent. The speed
strategy, it creates superior
with which competitors are able to acquire the skills needed to duplicate the benefits of a firm’s
value for customers, and when
competitors are not able to value-creating strategy determines how long the competitive advantage will last.2 Consider, for
imitate the value the firm’s example, that although Hertz was often an innovator in the industry, competitors were able to copy
products create or find it too Hertz’s innovations with relative ease, which means that the company could only enjoy a competi-
expensive to attempt imitation.
tive advantage for a short time.
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness 5
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6 Part 1: Strategic Management Inputs
Chapter 2
The External
Environment
Vision
Analysis
Mission
Values
Chapter 3
The Internal
Organization
Chapter 5
Chapter 11
Chapter 4 Competitive Chapter 6 Chapter 10
Organizational
Business-Level Rivalry and Corporate- Corporate
Structure and
Strategy
Chapter 7
Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 12 Chapter 13
Merger and
International Cooperative Strategic Strategic
Acquisition
Strategy Strategy Leadership Entrepreneurship
Strategies
Performance
Strategic
Competitiveness
Above-Average
Returns
We begin this chapter with several topics that are important to laying a foundation for the
strategic management process. First, we describe the current competitive landscape. Several
realities, including the emergence of a global economy, globalization resulting from that econ-
omy, and rapid technological changes, influence this landscape. Next, we examine three models
that firms use to gather the information and knowledge required to choose and then effectively
implement their strategies. The first model (industrial organization or I/O) suggests that the
external environment is the primary determinant of a firm’s strategic actions. According to this
model, identifying and then operating effectively in an attractive (i.e., profitable) industry or
segment of an industry are the keys to competitive success.9 The second model (resource-based)
suggests that a firm’s unique resources and capabilities are the critical link to strategic compet-
itiveness.10 The third model is based on the notion that the quality of a firm’s relationships with
internal and external constituencies (stakeholders) can lead organizations to achieve above-
average returns.
The information firms gather as they apply the three models helps firms define their purpose,
as reflected in a mission, vision, and values. After a discussion of missions, visions, and values, we
close the chapter with a brief introduction to strategic leadership and the elements of the strategic
management process.
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness 7
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
8 Part 1: Strategic Management Inputs
a weapon against a country in an effort to gain concessions in other areas.19 For example, the U.S.
government has used high tariffs on Chinese imports in an effort, in part, to get China to do more
to prevent Chinese companies from using the intellectual property of U.S. companies illegally.20
In addition to tariffs, protectionism can involve a government’s use of tools such as trade agree-
ments and quotas on how much of a good can be imported into the country.
Also, when evaluating the attractiveness of a country for expansion, it is important to con-
sider economic growth, since with growth comes increased demand for products and services. In
2021, India, Saudi Arabia, and France grew at a faster pace than most countries, which presented
opportunities for firms entering those countries.21 Emerging economies like India tend to grow
faster than developed economies because of an increase in citizens that have disposable income
(income that can be spent on things beyond absolute necessities). Important emerging economies
include the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China)22 as well as a few other countries that
have been identified as having high growth potential; namely, Vietnam, Indonesia, South Africa,
Turkey, Argentina, Colombia, and Egypt.23
Globalization
Globalization is the Globalization is the increasing economic interdependence among countries and their organizations
increasing economic as reflected in the flow of products, financial capital, and knowledge across country borders.24 It is a
interdependence among
countries and their
product of a large number of firms competing against one another in an increasing number of global
organizations as reflected in economies. In globalized markets and industries, firms might obtain financial capital in one national
the flow of products, financial market and use it to buy raw materials in another. Firms might then use manufacturing equipment
capital, and knowledge across purchased in a third national market to produce and deliver products that it sells in a fourth market.
country borders.
This phenomenon is described as a global supply chain. A global supply chain is a network of firms
A global supply chain is a that spans multiple countries with the purpose of supplying goods and services.25 Because firms seek
network of firms that spans
multiple countries with the
out the best and most inexpensive supplies and products regardless of where in the world they are
purpose of supplying goods found, practically every industry participates in a global supply chain, at least to some extent.
and services. Overall, globalization has led to higher performance standards with respect to multiple compet-
itive dimensions, including quality, cost, productivity, product introduction time, and operational
efficiency. Firms must learn how to deal with the reality that in today’s competitive landscape, only
companies capable of meeting, if not exceeding, global standards typically earn above-average returns.
Although globalization offers potential benefits to firms, it is not without challenges. One manage-
ment challenge comes from workers flowing rather freely among global economies. This is important
because employees are a key source of competitive advantage.26 For example, Argentina currently has
great difficulty keeping highly skilled tech workers in the country because they are being lured away
by companies in the United States and Europe offering them significant pay increases.27
Another challenge comes from a liability of foreignness, a term that describes the risks of com-
peting outside a firm’s domestic markets.28 The amount of time firms usually require to learn to
compete in markets that are new to them is one risk of entering a global market. A firm’s perfor-
mance can suffer until it gains the knowledge needed to compete successfully in a new global mar-
ket.29 This is especially true because of cultural differences that are likely to exist between the firm’s
home market and international markets. In addition, a firm’s performance may suffer by entering
too many global markets either simultaneously or too quickly. When this happens, the overall orga-
nization may lack the skills required to effectively manage all of its diversified global operations.30
The Strategic Focus demonstrates that global interconnectedness associated with global supply
chains also creates problems that would not exist if firms only relied on domestic markets for their
productive inputs.
Related to global supply chains are global value chains. Whereas a global supply chain pertains
A global value chain simply to the transfer of goods from one party to another across a global network, a global value
refers to the processes chain refers to the processes through which a firm receives raw materials, uses them to add value
through which a firm
receives raw materials, uses
through manufacturing a product that provides greater utility for the consumer, and sells the prod-
them to add value through uct to another firm or the ultimate consumer of the product, in a global setting.31 In other words, a
manufacturing a product that global supply chain pertains to an industry, whereas a global value chain pertains to an individual
provides greater utility for firm as it seeks to create value, in part, through its management of a global supply chain. It is a set of
the consumer, and sells the
product to another firm or interrelated activities that involve companies from multiple countries, coordinated by a particular
the ultimate consumer of the firm in search of a competitive advantage.
product, in a global setting. On the surface, a global supply chain and a global value chain may appear the same. The global
supply chain describes the steps in production from raw materials to ultimate consumer; however,
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness 9
Strategic Focus
Global Supply Chains and the Risks of Interconnectedness
Global supply chains are abundant in the global economy. They help
companies obtain the very best resources found anywhere in the
world, and at the best prices. However, they are not without prob-
lems, in part due to their impact on the increased complexity and
uncertainty that firms face. Also, participants in global supply chains
complain that they do not have full visibility into their supply chains,
and many supply chains are plagued by a lack of trust among partici-
pants. In addition, some consumers are resistant to globalization, and
are reluctant to buy products that are produced largely outside their
home countries.
However, one of the biggest problems associated with global sup-
Jenari/Shutterstock.com
ply chains occurs when there is a major shock in one or more parts
of the chain. An unexpected event such as a hurricane or earthquake
can stop production of components that are necessary to produce
products in other countries. One famous example is Toyota, which
had to close most of its Japan-based production plants due to supply Supply chain problems cause far-reaching shortages of products
chain disruptions after an earthquake and tsunami in 2011. The short-
age of parts lasted for weeks. Toyota put into place several measures
to protect the company from problems in case of a similar event. large provider of oil. Russia is also the major supplier of natural gas in
However, in 2016, a series of earthquakes led to closing down almost Europe. Higher energy prices mean higher transportation and manu-
all production lines in Japan due to supply shortages. Toyota is a facturing costs, which increase inflation. Also, Western governments
very successful company with highly sophisticated technologies; this imposed strong sanctions against Russia that reduced the country’s
example demonstrates how hard it is to mitigate the risks associated ability to conduct business in international markets.
with shocks to the global supply chain. Overall, the increased efficiency and broader availability of
Of course, the COVID-19 pandemic was a shock to the entire global goods and services make global supply chains an attractive part of
economy and affected virtually every global supply chain. Labor and the global economy. However, they also provide additional uncer-
materials shortages were very harmful to production around the tainty that makes strategic management difficult because almost
world. Researchers found that the COVID-related disruption to supply all businesses rely on them to some extent for the resources they
chains due to production capacity damage in China had their biggest need.
impact on the United States, South Korea, Japan, and Germany, and
Sources: Y. Trofimov, A. Cullison, B. Forrest, & A. M. Simmons, 2022, Russians close in on
especially in the electronics, textiles, machinery, manufacturing, and Ukranian capital, Wall Street Journal, February 25: A1, A10; I. Talley & M. Colchester, 2022,
wholesale trade sectors. However, this is largely because consumers West imposes stiffer sanctions, Wall Street Journal, February 25: A1, A4; C. D. Court,
in those countries purchase more non-essential items than consum- J.-P. Ferreira, G. J. D. Hewings, & M. L. Lahr, 2021, Accounting for global value chains: Rising
global inequality in the wake of COVID-19, International Review of Applied Economics,
ers in developing economies. Researchers also found that economies 35: 813–831; Y. Kashiwagi, Y. Todo, & P. Matous, 2021, Propogation of economic shocks
that were hurt the worst by supply chain disruptions as a result of through global supply chains—Evidence from Hurricane Sandy, Review of International
COVID-19 were in developing nations—those that could least afford Economics, 29: 1186–1220; Y. Chang, E. Iakovou, & W. Shi, 2020, Blockchain in global supply
chains and cross border trade: A critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art challenges and
such difficulties. opportunities, International Journal of Production Research, 58: 2082–2099; M. Qin, X. Liu,
A military conflict such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is another & X. Zhou, 2020, COVID-19 shock and global value chains: Is there a substitute for China,
type of unexpected event that influences global supply chains. In Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 56: 3588–3598; J. Webb, 2016, Toyota’s ‘quake-proof’
supply chain that never was, Forbes, www.forbes.com, April 26.
the run-up to the invasion, oil futures increased because Russia is a
it does not describe the integrated processes through which a firm adds value. Innovative firms
tend to participate with higher frequency in global value chains.32 Also, coordinative processes in
global value chains have been found to be an effective method for transferring technology to firms
in developing economies.33 However, suppliers in emerging economies that participate in global
value chains frequently do not reap many of the economic benefits from their innovations.34 This
is, perhaps, one of the reasons for the increase in protectionism.
Protectionism, the liability of foreignness, and the risks of interconnectedness in global supply
chains are all forces that are working to reduce globalization.35 Firms that are reducing their
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
10 Part 1: Strategic Management Inputs
participation in global supply chains and global value chains are a part of a trend called deglobal-
ization.36 On the other hand, some companies are still increasing their involvement in cross-border
activities in an effort to expand markets, purchase the best or lowest cost products, and learn or
develop new technologies.
This section demonstrates that success in international markets, even for firms with substan-
tial experience in the global economy, requires effective use of the strategic management process.
However, even if a firm is able to compete successfully in global markets, it also needs to commit
to remaining competitive in its home market. Firms seek competitiveness in both domestic and
international markets, in part, by remaining in tune with technological opportunities and potential
disruptions innovations might create.
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness 11
days.52 Also, when rival companies hire personnel from a competing firm, the result is that tech-
nological knowledge spills over from one firm to another company.53 Because of the potential for
technology diffusion and knowledge spillovers, firms must move quickly to use their innovations
productively. In this sense, the rate of technological diffusion has reduced the competitive benefits
of patents.54 Today, patents may still be an effective way of protecting proprietary technology in
a small number of industries such as pharmaceuticals. In contrast, many firms competing in the
electronics industry often do not apply for patents to prevent competitors from gaining access to
the technological knowledge included in the patent application.
Disruptive technologies—technologies that destroy the value of an existing technology and
create new markets—surface frequently in today’s competitive markets. 55 Think of the new mar-
kets that have been created by the technologies underlying the development of products such as
WiFi, the web browser, smartphones, and electric cars. These types of products represent radical or
breakthrough innovations (we discuss radical innovations in Chapter 13).56 A disruptive or radical
technology can create what is essentially a new industry or can harm industry incumbents.
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
12 Part 1: Strategic Management Inputs
The push for sustainability incorporates many of society’s expectations. The basic idea behind
Sustainability means that sustainability is that a firm should not deplete or destroy natural elements upon which it depends
a firm should not deplete for survival.67 For example, if a forestry company cuts down a tree to create paper pulp, it should
or destroy natural elements
upon which it depends for
plant at least one tree that it can cut down in the future. Sustainability has also been extended
survival. into other resource areas beyond the environment, such as human capital, gender equality, global
poverty, and innovation. For instance, a firm that develops programs to recruit and train employ-
ees that live in poverty is promoting sustainability because these activities will provide important
human resources used to produce products and services over the long term.
The corporate social responsibility movement extends beyond a firm’s own activities. Often
large firms are also held accountable for the actions of the firms with which they do business.68
One of the most significant manifestations of this phenomenon is the criticism a large cor-
poration receives when it outsources some of its production to firms in other countries that
engage in labor practices such as employing minor children or paying meager wages to over-
worked employees with poor working conditions (sometimes called sweatshops).69 Apple has
been highly criticized for many years for its inability to completely resolve problems like these
in its supply chain.70
As society embraced the principles underlying CSR, CSP (corporate social performance), and
sustainability, so did investors, especially institutional investors.71 Many of them want to invest in
firms that are socially responsible. One of the economic reasons for such investments is that firms
that are high in social responsibility are at less risk of legal suits, negative social media, walkouts,
and so forth.72 In addition, research evidence is supportive of a small but positive relationship
between corporate social responsibility and economic performance.73
As a result of increasing interest in the social responsibility of businesses, many firms have
emerged to track this sort of information, most often referred to with the title of ESG (environment,
society, and governance). Also, the majority of large corporations publish sustainability reports which
outline their activities in these areas. Unfortunately, some of those reports exaggerate the activities of
the firm in areas such as protecting the environment, a phenomenon referred to as greenwashing.74
There are organizations that hold businesses to a set of standards when reporting on sustainability,
such as the ISO 14000 standards and the Global Reporting Initiative. However, there is not one set of
standards that is universally accepted, and typically firms are not required to participate.75
We have now discussed the almost overwhelmingly complex global competitive environment
that managers face when devising strategies. Fortunately, there are some well-developed models
and tools to help managers with these sorts of decisions. In the next three sections, we will examine
three different models that managers can use to help their firms to achieve strategic competitive-
ness and above-average returns.
Learning Objective
1-3 The I/O Model of Above-Average Returns
1-3 Use the industrial
organization (I/O) model From the 1960s through the 1980s, those leading organizations believed that the external environ-
to explain how firms ment rather than the internal organization was the strongest influence on the choice of strategy.76
can earn above-average The industrial organization (I/O) model of above-average returns explains the external environ-
returns. ment’s dominant influence on the choice of strategy and the actions associated with it. The logic
of the I/O model is that a set of industry characteristics, including economies of scale, barriers to
market entry, diversification, product differentiation, the degree of concentration of firms in the
industry, and market frictions, determine the profitability potential of an industry or a segment
of it as well as the actions firms should take to operate profitably.77 We examine these industry
characteristics and explain their influence in Chapter 2.
Grounded in economics, four underlying assumptions explain the I/O model. First, the
model assumes that the external environment imposes pressures and constraints that deter-
mine the strategies that result in above-average returns. Second, most firms competing within
an industry or within a segment of that industry are assumed to control similar strategically
relevant resources and to pursue similar strategies in light of those resources. Third, resources
are highly mobile, meaning that any resource differences that might develop between firms
will be short-lived. Fourth, the model assumes that organizational decision makers are rational
individuals who are committed to acting in the firm’s best interests, as shown by their profit-
maximizing behaviors.78
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness 13
The I/O model challenges firms to find the most attractive industry in which to compete, based
on the second and third assumptions—that firms possess the same types of valuable resources and
that these resources are mobile across companies. This means that a firm is able to increase its per-
formance only when it competes in the industry with the highest profit potential and learns how to
use its resources to implement the strategy required by the industry’s structural characteristics. The
competitive realities associated with the I/O model find firms imitating each other’s strategies and
actions taken to implement them.79
The five forces model of competition is an analytical tool firms use to find the industry that is
the most attractive for them. The model (explained in Chapter 2) tries to capture the complexity
of competition by suggesting that an industry’s profitability is a function of interactions among
five forces: suppliers, buyers, competitive rivalry among firms currently in the industry, product
substitutes, and potential entrants to the industry.80 Firms use the five forces model to identify the
attractiveness of an industry (as measured by its profitability potential) as well as the most advanta-
geous position for the firm to take in that industry, given the industry’s characteristics.81 The model
suggests that firms can earn above-average returns by producing either standardized products at
costs below those of competitors (a cost leadership strategy) or by producing differentiated prod-
ucts for which customers are willing to pay a price premium (a differentiation strategy). We discuss
the cost leadership and product differentiation strategies fully in Chapter 4.
As shown in Figure 1.2, the I/O model suggests that firms earn above-average returns by study-
ing the external environment effectively as the foundation for identifying an attractive industry
and implementing an appropriate strategy in it. For example, in some industries, firms can reduce
An Attractive Industry
2. Locate an industry with
• An industry whose structural
high potential for above-
characteristics suggest above-
average returns.
average returns
Superior Returns
• Earning of above-average returns
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
14 Part 1: Strategic Management Inputs
competitive rivalry and erect barriers to entry by forming strategic alliances with other companies.
In turn, reduced rivalry increases the profitability potential for firms that are collaborating.82 Com-
panies that develop or acquire the internal skills needed to implement strategies required by the
external environment are likely to succeed, while those that do not are likely to fail.83 Hence, this
model suggests that the characteristics of the external environment influence returns more so than
do a firm’s unique internal resources and capabilities.
Research findings support the I/O model because the industry in which a firm competes explains
approximately 20 percent of its profitability. However, research also shows that the firm’s resources and
capabilities and the actions taken by using them accounts for 36 percent of the variance in firm prof-
itability.84 Thus, managers’ strategic actions affect the firm’s performance as do the characteristics of
the environment in which the firm competes.85 These findings suggest that the external environment
and a firm’s resources, capabilities, core competencies, and competitive advantages (see Chapter 3)
influence the company’s ability to achieve strategic competitiveness and earn above-average returns.
As shown in Figure 1.2, the I/O model assumes that a firm’s strategy is a set of commitments
and actions flowing from the characteristics of the industry in which the firm chose to compete.
The resource-based model, discussed next, takes a different view of the major influences on a firm’s
choice of strategy.
Learning Objective
1-4 The Resource-Based Model
1-4 Use the resource-
based model to explain of Above-Average Returns
how firms can earn
The resource-based model of above-average returns assumes that each organization is a collection
above-average returns.
of unique resources and capabilities. The uniqueness of resources and capabilities is the basis of a
firm’s strategy and its ability to earn above-average returns.86 Resources are inputs into a firm’s pro-
Resources are inputs into duction process, such as capital equipment, the skills of individual employees, patents, finances, and
a firm’s production process,
such as capital equipment, talented managers. Firms use three categories to classify their resources: physical, human, and orga-
the skills of individual nizational capital. Described fully in Chapter 3, resources are either tangible or intangible in nature.
employees, patents, finances, Individual resources alone may not yield a competitive advantage; resources have a greater
and talented managers.
likelihood of being a source of competitive advantage when integrated to form a capability.
A capability is the capacity A capability is the capacity for a set of resources to perform a task or an activity in an integrative
for a set of resources to manner.87 Core competencies are capabilities that serve as a source of competitive advantage for a
perform a task or an activity in
an integrative manner. firm over its rivals.88 Core competencies are often visible in the form of organizational functions.
For example, Apple’s R&D function is one of its core competencies, as is its ability to produce
Core competencies are
capabilities that serve as
innovative new products that create value for customers. Amazon’s distribution function is a core
a source of competitive competence while information technology is a core competence for Walmart.
advantage for a firm over its According to the resource-based model, differences in firms’ performances across time are due
rivals. primarily to their unique resources and capabilities rather than the industry’s structural charac-
teristics. Through continued use, capabilities become stronger and more difficult for competitors
to understand and imitate. As a source of competitive advantage, a capability must not be easily
imitated but also not too complex to understand and manage.89 The resource-based model of
above-average returns is found in Figure 1.3. This model suggests that the strategy the firm chooses
should allow it to use its competitive advantages in an attractive industry (firms use the I/O model
to identify an attractive industry).
Not all of a firm’s resources and capabilities have the potential to be the foundation for a com-
petitive advantage. This potential is realized when resources and capabilities are valuable, rare,
costly to imitate, and non-substitutable.90 Resources and capabilities are valuable when they allow
a firm to take advantage of opportunities or neutralize threats in its external environment. They
are rare when possessed by few, if any, current and potential competitors. Resources are costly to
imitate when other firms either cannot obtain them or are at a cost disadvantage in obtaining them
compared with a firm that already possesses them. They are non-substitutable when they have no
practical equivalents.
Over time, competitors find ways to imitate value-creating resources or to create new resources that
yield a different type of value for customers. Therefore, it is difficult to achieve and sustain a competi-
tive advantage based on resources alone. Firms integrate individual resources to develop configurations
of resources with the potential to build capabilities. Capabilities developed in this manner have a stron-
ger likelihood of becoming a core competence and of leading to a source of competitive advantage.91
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness 15
An Attractive Industry
4. Locate an attractive • An industry with opportunities
industry. that can be exploited by the
firm’s resources and capabilities
Superior Returns
• Earning of above-average returns
While the I/O model focuses on industry, which is external to the organization, and the
resource-based model focuses on internal resources and capabilities, a third model of above-aver-
age returns focuses simultaneously on internal stakeholders (employees) and external stakeholders
(customers, suppliers, communities, shareholders), and in particular on the relationships of a firm
with these stakeholders. Since all firm resources come from stakeholders, it makes sense that the
nature of relationships with those stakeholders will make a big difference in terms of a firm’s ability
to create and sustain competitive advantages leading to above-average returns. In fact, one of the
leading scholars on the resource-based model, Jay Barney, said that if there were no other stake-
holders besides shareholders providing resources to the firm that have the potential to earn profits,
there would be no profits.92 Learning Objective
1-5 Use the stakeholder
1-5 The Stakeholder Model model to explain how
firms can earn above-
of Above-Average Returns average returns.
Every organization involves a system of stakeholder groups with which it establishes and manages
relationships.93 Stakeholders are individuals, groups, and organizations that can both influence Stakeholders are
and are affected by the objectives, actions, and outcomes of a firm. They are internal and exter- individuals, groups, and
organizations that can both
nal constituencies that have a strong interest in the activities and outcomes of an organization influence and are affected by
and upon whom the organization relies on to achieve its own objectives.94 Internal stakehold- the objectives, actions, and
ers include all of a firm’s employees, including both non-managerial and managerial personnel. outcomes of a firm.
External stakeholders are a diverse group, and include the major suppliers of a firm’s capital as
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
16 Part 1: Strategic Management Inputs
well as product market stakeholders–the firm’s customers, suppliers, host communities, and any
unions representing the workforce. Also included are regulators and special interest groups or
NGOs (non-governmental organizations) that play a role in policing what the firm does.
How can a firm’s managers account for all of these different interests when devising competitive
strategies? A related question is whether all of these stakeholders are, or should be, equally import-
ant when devising strategies to create value and achieve above-average returns. A useful classifica-
tion between primary and secondary stakeholders helps managers answer both of these questions.
Primary stakeholders are Primary stakeholders are directly involved in the value-creating processes of the firm. They include
directly involved in the value- suppliers, employees, customers, the communities in which the firm operates, and financiers such as
creating processes of the firm.
the firm’s shareholders and banks. In fact, nearly two hundred CEOs from the largest corporations in
the United States released a signed statement through an association called the Business Roundtable
declaring that the purpose of the corporation is to serve these same five stakeholder groups.95
Secondary stakeholders Secondary stakeholders can both influence and are influenced by what the firm does, but
can both influence and they do not contribute directly to the value the firm creates. Many successful organizations have
are influenced by what the
firm does, but they do not learned that taking especially good care of primary stakeholders can lead to competitive advantage
contribute directly to the and high performance.96 Some of the sources of competitive advantage, and the value they create,
value the firm creates. are outlined in Figure 1.4. This sort of management is often called managing for stakeholders or
stakeholder-oriented management.
Superior Returns
• Earning of above-average returns
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness 17
Managing for stakeholders implies that more attention and resources are allocated to satisfy the
needs of stakeholders than might be necessary simply to retain their participation in the productive
activities of the firm.97 This also means that firms incur greater costs as, for example, they provide
better wages and benefits to their employees, give back to the communities in which they operate,
and provide high-quality products or outstanding service to customers at prices that are perhaps a
little lower than they might otherwise charge. Managing for stakeholders is economically feasible
because it leads to behavior on the part of stakeholders that helps the firm create more value than
might otherwise be created.98
Well-treated stakeholders reciprocate by treating the firm and its other stakeholders well in
return. One of the fundamental drivers of reciprocity is fairness, or what scholars call organizational
justice.99 Organizational justice can be divided into three primary types: distributional, procedural,
and interactional. Distributional justice means that stakeholders feel as though they are receiving
value through their relationship with their firm that is commensurate with what they contribute
to the firm. For example, an employee who works really hard and provides a lot of good sugges-
tions for firm innovations feels as though they are compensated fairly for the additional value they
provide. Procedural justice means that the firm listens to stakeholders and considers their posi-
tions when making important decisions that are likely to affect them. This does not mean that the
firm will always make decisions that have no negative impact on any stakeholder, although this is
a worthwhile objective. Interactional justice means that all stakeholders are treated with honesty,
respect, and integrity. Formal and informal (i.e., promises) contracts are made and kept. Day-to-
day transactions with stakeholders typically are positive, and if something goes wrong, the firm
does its best to remedy the situation.100
Stakeholders that experience this kind of fairness are likely to reciprocate through a higher level
of motivation to work with the firm and provide a level of effort and loyalty that they might not
provide to another firm in the same industry. Because these sorts of firms tend to develop strong
reputations for fairness, new stakeholders will want to be affiliated with them. Communities will
welcome expansions, job applications will be higher, and customers will want to buy from and
remain loyal to the firm. Suppliers will want to sell to the firm, which means the firm will have
more attractive buying propositions and an opportunity to acquire superior resources and develop
highly competitive capabilities. In general, stakeholders will be more cooperative with the firm and
with each other in value-creating activities.101
Organizational justice also leads to higher levels of stakeholder trust, and this means stakehold-
ers will be much more likely to share important information with them. Taking advantage of this
sort of trust, companies like Honda and Harley Davidson send out very long surveys to purchasers
of their automobiles and motorcycles. The information gathered is tremendously helpful in devel-
oping next-generation products, and it would not be made available if customers did not trust that
the information they provide would be given attention—that the companies would listen to them.
Trust associated with organizational justice is an important source of competitive advantage. In a
recent survey, a group reported that “Unlike other online retailers, 67 percent of Amazon custom-
ers trust the company to protect their privacy and personal data.”102
Consider also the advantages from generating feelings of trust among employees. They will
be much more likely to share information with management about how to improve products or
services, or to improve the efficiency with which they are made and delivered. Also, suppliers who
trust a firm will be more willing to invest resources in developing new components for sale to the
firm and are also more likely to share information with them that could improve their products and
production processes because they believe that the information will not be used opportunistically
against them.
These factors can lead to higher levels of innovation, sales growth, and operational efficiency.
The contracting process is also more efficient, because high levels of trust mean that contracts will
not need to contain as many safeguards or complicated contingency clauses.103 In addition, because
stakeholders are treated well and promises to them are kept, they are much less likely to pursue
negative actions such as boycotts, legal suits, walkouts and strikes, lobbying for new regulations,
or negative social media activities. This means that a firm that emphasizes organizational justice is
a less risky proposition for all of the firm’s stakeholders, including those that invest time, material
resources, energy, or money in the firm. Also, an enhanced reputation means that potential new
stakeholders, such as new customers, new suppliers, and new employees with excellent qualifica-
tions, will be attracted to the firm. This can give the firm an edge as it competes with other firms
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
18 Part 1: Strategic Management Inputs
Strategic Focus
Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Performance, and ESG
Stakeholder-oriented firms typically exhibit high performance these firms track a lot of information about how companies treat their
in matters that are important to society, beyond just taking stakeholders, their records on matters such as discrimination and
good care of their stakeholders. This sort of performance might inclusion, and whether they engage in “sin” industries such as tobacco
be labeled CSR (corporate social responsibility), CSP (corporate or gambling. In the governance (G) area, the rating firms collect infor-
social performance), or ESG (environment, society, and gover- mation about the firm’s board of directors, executive compensation,
nance. These labels are often used interchangeably, which can be and reporting transparency. Corporate governance will be discussed
confusing even to people who spend their lives studying such phe- in detail in Chapter 10. Over the years, the popular business press
nomena. Regardless of how they are labeled, corporate behaviors and many managers and investors have adopted the ESG label as a
associated with social responsibility are very important to many eco- descriptor for business activities associated with social responsibility
nomic actors and a large swath of society. or sustainability.
Scholars who study social responsibility have argued among There is a lot of overlap among the various labels for social
themselves regarding whether CSR or CSP is a better descriptor of responsibility primarily because they measure most of the same
the things a firm does that are either consistent with or go against things. However, managing for stakeholders is something different.
societal values. However, these same scholars tend to measure the The way a firm manages its stakeholders—how it treats them—is
same phenomena in their research, so the debate about terminology only one component of a measure of CSR, CSP, or ESG. The focus in
is strictly academic. Of course, the term sustainability, mentioned pre- this section has been on the strategic advantages that can accrue
viously in this chapter, has also been used in this literature. However, to a firm that treats its stakeholders particularly well, and not on
sustainability tends to focus more on environmental issues and a these broader conceptualizations of corporate social responsibil-
few other issues, whereas CSR and CSP incorporate all areas that ity. Although, again, firms that are high on the social responsibility
are scrutinized by society, which also includes how a firm treats its dimensions also tend to take good care of their stakeholders–
stakeholders. related, but not the same thing.
Another common label in this literature is ESG. The data provided
to the investment community by the firms who track and report Sources: S. Schaltegger, K. L. Christ, J. Wenzig, & R. L. Burritt, 2022, Corporate sustain-
ability management accounting and multi-level links for sustainability–A systematic
information about social responsibility tends to be divided into three review, International Journal of Management Reviews, in press; J. Mattingly & B. Bailey,
categories. The first area is the environment (E), such as the amount 2021, Constructs and measures in stakeholder management research, in M. A. Hitt
of carbon that is released through a firm’s operations, the degree to (ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Business and Management, New York, Oxford University
Press, doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.316; J. Hörisch, S. Schaltegger, &
which a firm pollutes in other ways, such as polluting groundwater, R. E. Freeman, 2020, Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting:
and the extent to which its operations destroy or deplete other nat- A conceptual synthesis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, https://doi.org/10.1016
ural resources such as trees or minerals. In the society (S) category, /j.jclepro.2020.124097.
for the most outstanding stakeholders.104 These sorts of positive outcomes lead to a higher level
of value creation than if a firm were to operate in a less fair and trustworthy fashion, especially if
noneconomic factors are considered.105
As mentioned previously, from an economic perspective, the only way this sort of management
pays off is if the economic benefits exceed the additional costs of treating stakeholders better than
they need to be treated simply to retain their participation with the firm. Fortunately, research evi-
dence supports the view that firms that manage for stakeholders often enjoy above-average returns
compared to firms that do not manage for stakeholders.106 In addition, as discussed in the Strategic
Focus, firms that manage for stakeholders tend also to perform well on related dimensions such as
CSR, CSP, and ESG.
Copyright 2024 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
dark brown laminated material, made up very largely of the cuticles
of Lepidodendroid plants.
From such examples we may naturally pass to fossils in which the
plant structure has been converted into carbonaceous matter or
even pure coal. This form of preservation is especially common in
plant-bearing beds at various geological horizons. In other cases,
again, some mineral solution, oxide of iron, talc, and other
substances, has replaced the plant tissues. From the Coal-Measures
of Switzerland Heer has figured numerous specimens of fern fronds
and other plants in which the leaf form has been left on the dark
coloured rock surface as a thin layer of white talcose material[87]. In
the Buntersandstone of the Vosges and other districts the red
imperfectly preserved impressions of plant stems and leaves are
familiar fossils[88]; the carbonaceous substance of the tissues has
been replaced by a brown or red oxide of iron.
INCRUSTATIONS.
Fig. 10. Section of an old pool filled up with a mass of Chara. (From the
Geol. Mag. vol. v. 1868, p. 563.)
In the Natural History Museum in the Jardin des Plantes, Paris,
one of the table-cases contains what appear to be small models of
flowers in green wax. These are in reality casts in wax of the moulds
or cavities left in a mass of calcareous travertine, on the decay and
disappearance of the encrusted flowers and other plant fragments[90].
This porous calcareous rock occurs near Sézanne in Southern
France, and is of Eocene age[91]. The plants were probably blown on
to the freshly deposited carbonate of lime, or they may have simply
fallen from the tree on to the incrusting matrix; more material was
afterwards deposited and the flowers were completely enclosed.
Eventually the plant substance decayed, and as the matrix hardened
moulds were left of the vegetable fragments. Wax was artificially
forced into these cavities and the surrounding substance removed by
the action of an acid, and thus perfect casts were obtained of Tertiary
flowers.
Darwin has described the preservation of trees in Van Diemen’s
land by means of calcareous substances. In speaking of beds of
blown sand containing branches and roots of trees he says:
“The whole became consolidated by the percolation of calcareous matter; and the
cylindrical cavities left by the decaying of the wood were thus also filled up with a hard
pseudo-stalactitical stone. The weather is now wearing away the softer parts, and in
consequence the hard casts of the roots and branches of the trees project above the
surface, and, in a singularly deceptive manner, resemble the stumps of a dead
thicket[92].”
Although the branches have not been preserved for their whole
length, they extend a distance of 29 feet 6 inches from right to left,
and 28 feet in the opposite direction.
The fossil represented in fig. 1 (p. 10), from the collection of Dr
John Woodward, affords a good example of a well-defined
impression. The surface of the specimen, of which a cast is
represented in fig. 1, shows very clearly the characteristic leaf-
cushions and leaf-scars of a Lepidodendron. The stem was
embedded in soft sand, and as the latter became hard and set, an
impression was obtained of the external markings of the
Lepidodendron. Decay subsequently removed the substance of the
plant.
Fig. 14.
A. Araucarioxylon Withami (L. and H.). Radiating lines of crystallisation in
secondary wood, as seen in transverse section.
B. Lepidodendron sp. Concentric lines of crystallisation, and scalariform
tracheids, as seen in longitudinal section.
In such nodules, we find that not only has the framework of the
tissues been preserved, but frequently the remains of cell contents
are clearly seen. In some cases the cells of a tissue may contain in
each cavity a darker coloured spot, which is probably the mineralised
cell nucleus. (Fig. 42, A, 1, p. 214.) The contents of secretory sacs,
such as those containing gum or resin, are frequently found as black
rods filling up the cavity of the cell or canal. The contents of cells in
some cases closely simulate starch grains, and such may have been
actually present in the tissues of a piece of a fossil dicotyledonous
stem described by Thiselton-Dyer from the Lower Eocene Thanet
beds[121], and in the rhizome of a fossil Osmunda recorded by
Carruthers[122]. (Fig. 42, B, p. 214.)
Schultze in 1855[123] recorded the discovery of cellulose by
microchemical tests applied to macerated tissue from Tertiary lignite
and coal. With reference to the possibility of recognising cell
contents in fossil tissue it is interesting to find that Dr Murray of
Scarborough had attempted, and apparently with success, to apply
chemical tests to the tissues of Jurassic leaves. In a letter written to
Hutton in 1833 Murray speaks of his experiments as follows:—
“Reverting to the Oolitic plants, I have again and with better success been
experimenting upon the thin transparent films of leaves, chiefly of Taeniopteris vittata
and Cyclopteris, which from their tenuity offer fine objects for the microscope.... By
many delicate trials I have ascertained the existence still in these leaves of resin and of
tannin.... I am seeking among the filmy leaves of the Fucoides of A. Brongniart for
iodine, but hitherto without success, and indeed can hardly expect it, as probably did
iodine exist in them, it must have long ago entered into new combinations[124].”
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookmass.com