Setting up a moral
system
Basic assumptions and basic
principles
Basic assumptions
1. It should be rationally based and yet not devoid of emotion.
2. It should be as logically consistent as possible but not rigid and
3.
4.
5.
inflexible.
It must have universality or general application to all humanity and yet
be applicable in a practical way to particular individuals and situations.
It should be able to be taught and promulgated.
It must have the ability to resolve conflicts among human beings,
duties, and obligations.
Basic Principles:
1.The value of life
2.The principle of goodness or rightness
3.The principle of justice or fairness
4.The principle of truth-telling or honesty
5.The principle of individual freedom
The Value of Life Principle
Human beings should serve life and accept death.
There can be no morality without living human
beings.
Examples:
Judaeo-Christian
Kant
Buddhism
Hinduism
The Principle of Goodness or
Rightness
Principle of
Beneficence
One should
always do good.
Principle of NonMaleficence
One should always try
to prevent and avoid
doing badness or
harm.
The Principle of Goodness or
Rightness
This principle demands that one should
Promote goodness over badness and do good (beneficence)
Cause no harm or badness (non-maleficence)
Prevent badness or harm (non-maleficence)
If human beings are to be good (moral), then they should do
so-and-so.
Ex. Obey the laws of God
Act in their own self-interest
The Principle of Justice or
Fairness
Human beings should treat other human beings fairly and
justly when distributing goodness and badness among them.
The Principle of Truth-Telling or
Honesty
Meaningful communication is necessary for any moral system
and in any moral relationship between two or more human
beings
How can any moral system function if its participants can never know
whether anyone is telling the truth?
How can agreements be made or maintained without some assurance
that people are entering into them honestly and truthfully?
The Principle of Individual
Freedom
People, being individuals with individual differences, must
have the freedom to choose their own ways and means of
being moral within the framework of the first four basic
principles.
Suppose a man wants to
rape a woman? Would
this ever be a moral act?
The Value of Life
This principle would certainly be violated whether or not the
woman were killed because her life and its quality would be
threatened by the act of rape. She would be sexually violated
and also violated in other ways, both physically and
psychologically.
The Principle of Goodness or
Rightness
There is nothing good for the woman in the act of rape.
The
only possible good in the act would be the pleasure the rapist
might get, but that pleasure is certainly to be classed as
malicious because it totally disregard the pain and
unhappiness of his victim.
The Principle of Justice or Fairness
There is no way the rapists act could be considered to be just
or fair to the woman because he would be forcing himself on
her against her wishes and without her permission,
committing the greatest invasion of her privacy and her life.
The Principle of Truth-Telling or
Honesty
This principle may or may not come into picture, depending
upon whether or not the rapist lies to the woman in order to
get her into a situation where the rape can take place.
The Principle of Individual Freedom
Because rape violates all of the first four principles, it can
never be considered as moral, and, therefore, no man or
woman should ever have the freedom to rape another.