Skip to content

Feature/correct splitter #288

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

teodor-r
Copy link
Contributor

@teodor-r teodor-r commented Jul 1, 2025

Description

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Optimization

How Has This Been Tested?

Before submitting a PR, please check yourself against the following list. It would save us quite a lot of time.

  • Have you read the contribution guide?
  • Have you updated the relevant docstrings? We're using Numpy format, please double-check yourself
  • Does your change require any new tests?
  • Have you updated the changelog file?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (9b3992e) to head (92c53e6).
Report is 113 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main      #288     +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%             
===========================================
  Files           45        78     +33     
  Lines         2242      5335   +3093     
===========================================
+ Hits          2242      5335   +3093     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Copyright 2023-2024 MTS (Mobile Telesystems)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2023-2025

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still 2023-2025

@@ -5,10 +5,14 @@ All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).

## Unreleased
## [Unreleased]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Brackets are only for release versions

### Added
- `extras` argument to `SequenceDataset`, `extra_cols` argument to `TransformerDataPreparatorBase`, `session_tower_forward` and `item_tower_forward` methods to `SimilarityModuleBase` ([#287](https://github.com/MobileTeleSystems/RecTools/pull/287))

### Fixed

- [Breaking] Now `LastNSplitter` class guarantees correct splitting in case of identical timestamps ([#288](https://github.com/MobileTeleSystems/RecTools/pull/288))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- [Breaking] Now `LastNSplitter` class guarantees correct splitting in case of identical timestamps ([#288](https://github.com/MobileTeleSystems/RecTools/pull/288))
- [Breaking] Now `LastNSplitter` guarantees taking the last ordered interaction in dataframe in case of identical timestamps ([#288](https://github.com/MobileTeleSystems/RecTools/pull/288))

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Copyright 2023-2024 MTS (Mobile Telesystems)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still 2023-2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants