tests: integration tests for boot mode #664
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #664 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.75% 69.90% +0.15%
==========================================
Files 58 59 +1
Lines 12550 12612 +62
==========================================
+ Hits 8754 8817 +63
+ Misses 3796 3795 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
marmarek
force-pushed
the
bootmode-integ-test
branch
from
27b725e to
54f42ba
Compare
|
So, the test said |
OpenQA test summaryComplete test suite and dependencies: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/overview?distri=qubesos&version=4.3&build=2025030800-4.3&flavor=pull-requests Test run included the following:
New failures, excluding unstableCompared to: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/overview?distri=qubesos&version=4.3&build=2025021804-4.3&flavor=update
Failed tests25 failures
Fixed failuresCompared to: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/129058#dependencies 9 fixed
Unstable testsPerformance TestsPerformance degradation:32 performance degradations
Remaining performance tests:40 tests
|
This was referenced Feb 27, 2025
Merged
marmarek
force-pushed
the
bootmode-integ-test
branch
from
54f42ba to
8b3a030
Compare
marmarek
force-pushed
the
bootmode-integ-test
branch
from
8b3a030 to
fcca635
Compare
This was referenced Mar 3, 2025
Right now they mostly duplicate what unit tests are already testing. It will make more sense for boot mode with in-vm kernel, and/or Whonix package (instead of dummy boot modes). QubesOS/qubes-issues#9750
marmarek
force-pushed
the
bootmode-integ-test
branch
from
fcca635 to
c402256
Compare
This was referenced Mar 4, 2025
|
@ArrayBolt3 I'll also merge this one as is. It did found some issues that unit tests missed before, so IMO it's still useful (even though duplicates some parts). And later it can be extended to test in-vm kernel support. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Right now they mostly duplicate what unit tests are already testing. It
will make more sense for boot mode with in-vm kernel, and/or Whonix
package (instead of dummy boot modes).
QubesOS/qubes-issues#9750
Related to #653
FYI @ArrayBolt3