Skip to content

SONARPY-3065 Create rule S7621: AWS waiters should be used instead of custom polling loops #5158

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

You can preview this rule here (updated a few minutes after each push).

Review

A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:

  • logical errors and incorrect information
  • information gaps and missing content
  • text style and tone
  • PR summary and labels follow the guidelines

@Seppli11 Seppli11 changed the title Create rule S7621 SONARPY-3065 Create rule S7621: AWS waiters should be used instead of custom polling loops Jun 25, 2025
@Seppli11 Seppli11 force-pushed the rule/add-RSPEC-S7621 branch 7 times, most recently from 06e6bac to ed6619e Compare June 25, 2025 13:24
},
"attribute": "EFFICIENT"
}
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

empty line is missed

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, see small comment about empty line

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants