Move MQR changes to cfamily only. (CPP-6672)

[frederic-tingaud-sonarsource]

No description provided.

[frederic-tingaud-sonarsource]

The moves were done manually, so it might deserve a good check before validating.

[alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource]

I have done the following: fae62e1 is the commit before our merge.

git diff fae62e1b9fb8e57eaf12e59d9d6edad24dfdef69 --stat | grep -oP "rules/S\d+/metadata.json"

I see only files from 3bd7eea, so shared files are reverted to the previous state.

I have also gone over the diff view, and it looks good to me.

The following rules had only formatting changes, unless I am mistaken: S1134, S2193, S2245, S2259, S2589, S2612, S2681 S4423, S4426, S4790, S4830, S5042, S5332, S5443, S5527, S5542, S5547, S5802, S5847, S5849,

S942 was removed, and remains removed. Since the metadata.json was empty, I assume this is OK.

Shouldn't we add someone from TS and/or JVM to double check?

[loic-joly-sonarsource]

I think we should not perform formatting-only changes in this PR.
Here is my list: S1134 S2193 S2245 S2259 S2589 S2612 S2681 S4423 S4426 S4790 S4830 S5042 S5332 S5443 S5527 S5542 S5547 S5802 S5847 S5849, it's identical to the one from @alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource

1 real change

[sonarqube-next]

Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

[sonarqube-next]

Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube