Made haystack-2.0.0beta compatible

[pannal]

This makes django-cms-search haystack-2.0.0beta compatible in a pretty clean way.

[BertrandBordage]

I have not looked at the code, but this commit works perfectly on my haystack-2.0.0beta installation since weeks.
Why not pulling this?

[beniwohli]

Mainly because haystack 2.0 is not out yet. AFAICT, it's not possible to support both haystack 1.2 and 2.0-beta at the same time.

Once haystack 2.0 is out, I'll look into supporting it.

[BertrandBordage]

Ok, twas a silly question :)
I thought you could be interested in starting a new branch to prepare django-cms-search to be compatible with haystack 2.0 when it would be out.

[JoeJasinski]

Hi, I'd be interested in using a this with support for haystack 2.0. Would it be possible to create this 2.0 development branch, perhaps with BertrandBordage's codebase as a starting point, so we could consolidate any work towards haystack 2.0 support in one location? Or should I fork off of BertrandBordage's branch and he can merge at the appropriate time?

[foobacca]

Any news on this? Haystack is now at 2.1.0 and 2.0 was released in May 2013 - six months ago.

[beniwohli]

@foobacca the bad news is that I don't plan to update django-cms-search to haystack 2, it's just way to messy. The good news is that there's a new module called aldryn-search over at https://github.com/aldryn/aldryn-search which works with haystack 2. I didn't really announce it yet because "aldryn" as a whole (https://www.django-cms.org/en/aldryn/) isn't officially announced yet. But we're using aldryn-search in production and it works quite well.

[grigoryk]

@piquadrat you might still want to put a note about aldryn-search into the README of the project. It might save people some time digging around 👍

[johnraz]

+1 to the readme addition