Skip to content

Improve code clarity and consistency through minor refinements #4796

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

arpitjain099
Copy link

Changes proposed in this pull request:

This pull request makes small but meaningful improvements to comments, naming, and documentation to enhance the overall clarity and consistency of the codebase. While these updates do not impact functionality, they align with best practices for maintainable and high-quality code.

Feedback is welcome, and I’m happy to iterate further if needed. Thanks for taking the time to review!

security considerations

None

@arpitjain099
Copy link
Author

Hi @drewbo @apburnes @sknep @svenaas — apologies for the unsolicited mention. I noticed you're among the recent top contributors to the repo and thought you might be well-positioned to review this PR. I'd really appreciate your feedback if you have a moment. Thank you!

@arpitjain099 arpitjain099 force-pushed the feature/improve-code-quality branch from 2e7b8ee to 569b824 Compare May 27, 2025 16:39
@wz-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

wz-gsa commented May 28, 2025

While we appreciate your effort to improve the project, cloud.gov is a federally operated platform and, due to our compliance, security, and trust posture requirements, we’re only able to accept contributions from individuals affiliated with the U.S. government or approved collaborators.

As a result, we won’t be able to merge this PR.

We encourage you to continue exploring our code and appreciate your understanding as we maintain the boundaries necessary for a secure and trusted federal platform.

— The cloud.gov Team

@wz-gsa wz-gsa closed this May 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants