Skip to content

Remove ILM's CleanupTargetIndexStep #129130

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

nielsbauman
Copy link
Contributor

This step was added to ILM when downsampling was not yet retryable. Downsampling has been retryable for some time now, so there were no usages for this step.
We still keep the step name (and use it for a no-op step) for BwC.

This step was added to ILM when downsampling was not yet retryable.
Downsampling has been retryable for some time now, so there were no
usages for this step.
We still keep the step name (and use it for a no-op step) for BwC.
@nielsbauman nielsbauman requested a review from dakrone June 9, 2025 05:46
@nielsbauman nielsbauman added >refactoring :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management labels Jun 9, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-data-management (Team:Data Management)

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team label Jun 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@joegallo joegallo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I confirmed that the two step names are actually the same, and so this LGTM.

@nielsbauman nielsbauman merged commit 80aa17e into elastic:main Jun 12, 2025
18 checks passed
@nielsbauman nielsbauman deleted the remove-cleanup-target-index-step branch June 12, 2025 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management >refactoring Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team v9.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants