Skip to content

[DOCS][8.19] Promote ESQL search functions to GA in the docs #129897

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 24, 2025

Conversation

leemthompo
Copy link
Contributor

8.x equivalent of #129786

  • removed preview = true from java function annotations for full-text search functions
  • generated updates to asciidoc and kibana docs

- removed `preview = true` from java function annotations for full-text search functions
- generated updates to asciidoc and kibana docs
- 8.x equivalent of elastic#129786
@leemthompo leemthompo self-assigned this Jun 24, 2025
@leemthompo leemthompo added >docs General docs changes Team:Docs Meta label for docs team :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL v8.19.0 labels Jun 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Documentation preview:

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) label Jun 24, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (Team:Docs)

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

@leemthompo leemthompo merged commit c19cc6b into elastic:8.19 Jun 24, 2025
22 checks passed
@leemthompo
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @stratoula for visibility because this impacts 8.19 Kibana inline docs too :)

@leemthompo leemthompo deleted the ga-search-functions branch June 24, 2025 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL >docs General docs changes Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) Team:Docs Meta label for docs team v8.19.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants