Skip to content

Revert "Dispatch ingest work to coordination thread pool (#129820)" #129949

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 24, 2025

Conversation

bcully
Copy link
Contributor

@bcully bcully commented Jun 24, 2025

This reverts commit 53dae7a.

@bcully bcully requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2025 16:36
@bcully bcully added >non-issue :Distributed Indexing/CRUD A catch all label for issues around indexing, updating and getting a doc by id. Not search. v9.1.0 labels Jun 24, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed-indexing (Team:Distributed Indexing)

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team label Jun 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@henningandersen henningandersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@bcully
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcully commented Jun 24, 2025

@elasticmachine run Elasticsearch Serverless Checks

@bcully bcully merged commit 73b0a60 into elastic:main Jun 24, 2025
32 checks passed
mridula-s109 pushed a commit to mridula-s109/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
Tim-Brooks added a commit to Tim-Brooks/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/CRUD A catch all label for issues around indexing, updating and getting a doc by id. Not search. >non-issue Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team v9.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants