-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Add unit tests for ActionCodeURL #14683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback. |
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request adds unit tests for the ActionCodeURL
class, which is responsible for parsing out-of-band links. The tests cover various scenarios, including valid and invalid URLs, missing parameters, different modes, and URLs with all properties. Overall, the tests seem comprehensive and well-structured.
Merge Readiness
The pull request adds valuable unit tests to improve the reliability of the ActionCodeURL
class. I did not find any critical or high severity issues, and the code appears ready for merging. However, I recommend addressing the medium and low severity issues to further enhance the code quality. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.
Follow up to #14666 and #14668
#no-changelog