-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
[cir-translate] Fix crash issue where the data layout string is missing #147209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ | |
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h" | ||
#include "llvm/TargetParser/Host.h" | ||
|
||
#include "clang/Basic/Diagnostic.h" | ||
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticIDs.h" | ||
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticOptions.h" | ||
#include "clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h" | ||
#include "clang/CIR/Dialect/IR/CIRDialect.h" | ||
#include "clang/CIR/Dialect/Passes.h" | ||
|
@@ -82,12 +85,17 @@ llvm::LogicalResult prepareCIRModuleDataLayout(mlir::ModuleOp mod, | |
|
||
// Data layout is fully determined by the target triple. Here we only pass the | ||
// triple to get the data layout. | ||
llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::DiagnosticIDs> diagID( | ||
new clang::DiagnosticIDs); | ||
clang::DiagnosticOptions diagOpts; | ||
clang::DiagnosticsEngine diagnostics(diagID, diagOpts, | ||
new clang::IgnoringDiagConsumer()); | ||
llvm::Triple triple(rawTriple); | ||
clang::TargetOptions targetOptions; | ||
targetOptions.Triple = rawTriple; | ||
// FIXME: AllocateTarget is a big deal. Better make it a global state. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you update this comment to just refer to TargetOptions? It seems that we're only using the data layout string here, but there are many other things in TargetOptions that might be relevant at some point. |
||
std::unique_ptr<clang::TargetInfo> targetInfo = | ||
clang::targets::AllocateTarget(llvm::Triple(rawTriple), targetOptions); | ||
llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::TargetInfo> targetInfo = | ||
clang::TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo(diagnostics, targetOptions); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I was hoping we had a CreateTargetInfo variation that could do the diagnostic boilerplate, but looks like we don't. Any specific reason we need to switch on using There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe we could add one? It seems there are multiple other callers that similarly don't use these. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. +1 for adding a variant There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's copied from other usage of |
||
if (!targetInfo) { | ||
mod.emitError() << "error: invalid target triple '" << rawTriple << "'\n"; | ||
return llvm::failure(); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are you allocating a ref-counted DiagnosticIDs but using a local variable for DiagnosticOptions? The existing examples I found in the clang code seem to use ref-counted pointers for both.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Through examples, only
DiagnosticIDs
uses smart pointer. I will double-check.