Skip to content

Use OxCaml instead of OCaml #4012

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cuihtlauac
Copy link
Contributor

When relevant, according to my understanding. And I may have missed
some

When relevant, according to my understanding. And I may have missed
some
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I favor keeping the "stock" qualifier. Except maybe if that word is less familiar, change it to "mainstream"? The appearance (or lack) of the x is a bit subtle.

@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ about its implementation.)

## Kind annotations on variables

Type variables come in two flavors in OCaml: rigid and unifiable. Rigid type
Type variables come in two flavors in OxCaml: rigid and unifiable. Rigid type
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, the statement is true of OCaml just as much as OxCaml. I'm happy for the change here, but I just wanted to point out that this is not new.

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ let r = create forty_two
## Limitations

All polymorphic parameter require an annotation. Without an annotation
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
All polymorphic parameter require an annotation. Without an annotation
Each polymorphic parameter requires an annotation. Without an annotation,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants