Skip to content

Adding more explicit error code #12427

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yunquan812
Copy link

Summary: {title}, the Internal and InvalidArgument errors don't tell what is really going wrong

Differential Revision: D78233596

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 14, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/12427

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4cdf11e with merge base ee9e6d9 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jul 14, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78233596

Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

/*
* Registration errors.
*/
RegistrationExceedingMaxKernels = 0x40,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know what our convention is around numbering here but I imagine we should just use the next number. @mergennachin do you know?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are loosely grouped by type with jumps to allow new types in. If anything the original OperatorMissing is in the wrong spot, but since its there already probably just make this error 0x15 @yunquan812

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. Let me update it :)

yunquan812 pushed a commit to yunquan812/executorch that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2025
Summary:

{title}, the `Internal` and `InvalidArgument` errors don't tell what is really going wrong

Differential Revision: D78233596
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78233596

yunquan812 pushed a commit to yunquan812/executorch that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#12427

{title}, the `Internal` and `InvalidArgument` errors don't tell what is really going wrong

Differential Revision: D78233596
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#12427

{title}, the `Internal` and `InvalidArgument` errors don't tell what is really going wrong

Differential Revision: D78233596
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78233596

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants