-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 282
feat(feynman): include history storage in witness for blockhash opcode #1218
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce additional state read logic in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Interpreter
participant StateDB
participant HistoryStorageContract
Interpreter->Interpreter: Retrieve block hash for block number
Interpreter->Interpreter: Compute ring index (blockNum % HistoryServeWindow)
Interpreter->Interpreter: Construct key with ring index
Interpreter->StateDB: GetState(HistoryStorageContract, key)
StateDB->Interpreter: Return state value
Interpreter->Interpreter: Ensure slot is present in witness
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (1)core/vm/instructions.go (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
1. Purpose or design rationale of this PR
l2geth counterpart to scroll-tech/scroll-revm#54.
2. PR title
Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:
3. Deployment tag versioning
Has the version in
params/version.go
been updated?4. Breaking change label
Does this PR have the
breaking-change
label?Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores